World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
39
Citations
7258
World Ranking
9681
National Ranking
4096

Douglas S. Reeves publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas S. Reeves sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 137 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Douglas S. Reeves D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Douglas S. Reeves sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Douglas S. Reeves is affiliated with North Carolina State University in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Computer Science, with a focus on several subfields including Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Rheumatology, and Immunology.

The main topics covered in their work include Network Security and Intrusion Detection, Spam and Phishing Detection, Web Application Security Vulnerabilities, IPv6, Mobility, Handover, Networks, Security, Advanced Authentication Protocols Security, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research, and Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Diseases.

Recent publications by Douglas S. Reeves span a range of venues and years, reflecting diverse research interests. These include:

  • A survey of domain name system vulnerabilities and attacks, 2020, Journal of Surveillance Security and Safety
  • AB1127 IMPACT OF OVERWEIGHT AND OBESITY ON CLINICAL AND IMMUNOLOGICAL FEATURES IN SYSTEMIC LUPUS ERYTHEMATOSUS, 2024, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases
  • Advanced Secure DNS Name Autoconfiguration with Authentication for Enterprise IoT Network, 2021, 2021 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM)
  • 142 Longitudinal immune cell profiling and clinical features in obese lupus patients, 2025, The American Journal of the Medical Sciences

Douglas S. Reeves has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, including S Centala, A. L. Reese, S. Hayat, Toni R. Leeth, and Tae Hyun Kim. Collaborations with these researchers have often resulted in work across the overlapping domains of computer networks, security, and immunology-related studies.

Their publications have appeared in multiple academic venues such as the Journal of Surveillance Security and Safety, Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 2021 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM), and The American Journal of the Medical Sciences. These venues reflect the interdisciplinary nature of their research that spans both technical and medical fields.

Best Publications

  • Constructing attack scenarios through correlation of intrusion alerts

    Peng Ning;Yun Cui;Douglas S. Reeves

  • Evaluation of multicast routing algorithms for real-time communication on high-speed networks

    H.F. Salama;D.S. Reeves;Y. Viniotis

  • Real-time communication in packet-switched networks

    C.M. Aras;J.F. Kurose;D.S. Reeves;H. Schulzrinne

  • Techniques and tools for analyzing intrusion alerts

    Peng Ning;Yun Cui;Douglas S. Reeves;Dingbang Xu

  • Robust correlation of encrypted attack traffic through stepping stones by manipulation of interpacket delays

    Xinyuan Wang;Douglas S. Reeves

  • Analyzing intensive intrusion alerts via correlation

    Peng Ning;Yun Cui;Douglas S. Reeves

  • A distributed algorithm for delay-constrained unicast routing

    H.F. Salama;D.S. Reeves;Y. Viniotis

  • Fast malware classification by automated behavioral graph matching

    Younghee Park;Douglas Reeves;Vikram Mulukutla;Balaji Sundaravel

  • Inter-Packet Delay Based Correlation for Tracing Encrypted Connections through Stepping Stones

    Xinyuan Wang;Douglas S. Reeves;Shyhtsun Felix Wu

  • Sleepy watermark tracing: an active network-based intrusion response framework

    X. Wang;Douglas S. Reeves;Douglas S. Reeves;Shyhtsun Felix Wu;Jim Yuill

  • A distributed algorithm for delay-constrained unicast routing

    Douglas S. Reeves;Hussein F. Salama

  • On the secrecy of timing-based active watermarking trace-back techniques

    Pai Peng;Peng Ning;D.S. Reeves

  • MetaAware: Identifying Metamorphic Malware

    Qinghua Zhang;D.S. Reeves

  • Tracing Traffic through Intermediate Hosts that Repacketize Flows

    Young June Pyun;Young Hee Park;Xinyuan Wang;D.S. Reeves

  • Defending against Sybil attacks in sensor networks

    Qinghua Zhang;Pan Wang;D.S. Reeves;Peng Ning

  • Deriving common malware behavior through graph clustering

    Younghee Park;Douglas S. Reeves;Mark Stamp

  • Deriving common malware behavior through graph clustering

    Younghee Park;Douglas Reeves

  • A survey of statistical source models for variable-bit-rate compressed video

    Michael R. Izquierdo;Douglas S. Reeves

  • Analyzing network traffic to detect self-decrypting exploit code

    Qinghua Zhang;Douglas S. Reeves;Peng Ning;S. Purushothaman Iyer

  • Self-stabilizing structured ring topology P2P systems

    A. Shaker;D.S. Reeves

Frequent Co-Authors

Peng Ning
Peng Ning Google (United States)
George N. Rouskas
George N. Rouskas North Carolina State University
Dharma P. Agrawal
Dharma P. Agrawal University of Cincinnati
Injong Rhee
Injong Rhee North Carolina State University
John Yen
John Yen Pennsylvania State University
Sushil Jajodia
Sushil Jajodia George Mason University
Mladen A. Vouk
Mladen A. Vouk North Carolina State University
Nancy J. Cooke
Nancy J. Cooke Arizona State University
Yung Yi
Yung Yi Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology
Sangtae Ha
Sangtae Ha University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to many related fields and flexible study options. Aspiring professionals can enhance their expertise with online electrical engineering courses USA, adding value to tech careers through advanced skills in hardware and systems.

For those seeking faster entry or career pivots, consider short certificate programs that pay well. These programs can rapidly boost employability in areas like IT support, networking, or cybersecurity, making them ideal for quick upskilling.

If advancing your education is a priority, exploring the fastest online master’s degree opportunities enables you to earn graduate credentials at an accelerated pace. This pathway helps you stay competitive and meet job market demands swiftly.

To maximize your education investment, it’s wise to focus on the most valuable masters degrees. These are programs with strong job growth and starting salaries, ensuring your efforts align with evolving industry needs.

Best Scientists Citing Douglas S. Reeves

Trending Scientists