World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
69
Citations
14310
World Ranking
2677
National Ranking
1257

John E. Pintar publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John E. Pintar sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 199 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

John E. Pintar D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John E. Pintar sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

John E. Pintar is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on neuroscience, biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology, and medicine. Within these broad areas, their work concentrates on subfields such as cellular and molecular neuroscience, molecular biology, pharmacology, organic chemistry, and physiology.

Their main topics of study encompass neuropeptides and animal physiology, receptor mechanisms and signaling, alkaloids synthesis and pharmacology, chemical synthesis and alkaloids, pain mechanisms and treatments, pharmacological receptor mechanisms and effects, and the traditional and medicinal uses of Annonaceae.

John E. Pintar has published extensively in multiple venues. Frequent publication outlets include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, Nature Communications, Diabetologia, and Science.

  • Oxidative Metabolism as a Modulator of Kratom's Biological Actions (2021, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry)
  • Site selective C-H functionalization of Mitragyna alkaloids reveals a molecular switch for tuning opioid receptor signaling efficacy (2021, Nature Communications)
  • Synthesis and Pharmacology of a Novel μ-δ Opioid Receptor Heteromer-Selective Agonist Based on the Carfentanyl Template (2020, Journal of Medicinal Chemistry)
  • Regulation of Opioid Receptors by Their Endogenous Opioid Peptides (2021, Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology)
  • Mu opioid receptors on hippocampal GABAergic interneurons are critical for the antidepressant effects of tianeptine (2021, Neuropsychopharmacology)

Frequent collaborators include Susruta Majumdar, Michael Ansonoff, Amanda Hunkele, Andrew C. Kruegel, and Dalibor Sameš.

Best Publications

  • Immunocytochemical demonstration of monoamine oxidase B in brain astrocytes and serotonergic neurons

    Pat Levitt;John E. Pintar;Xandra O. Breakefield

  • Retention of Supraspinal Delta-like Analgesia and Loss of Morphine Tolerance in δ Opioid Receptor Knockout Mice

    Yanxin Zhu;Michael A. King;Alwin G.P. Schuller;Joshua F. Nitsche

  • A role for heterodimerization of μ and δ opiate receptors in enhancing morphine analgesia

    Ivone Gomes;Achla Gupta;Julija Filipovska;Hazel H. Szeto

  • Retention of heroin and morphine-6 beta-glucuronide analgesia in a new line of mice lacking exon 1 of MOR-1.

    Alwin G.P. Schuller;Michael A. King;Jiwen Zhang;Elizabeth Bolan

  • Targeted Deletion of the Vgf Gene Indicates that the Encoded Secretory Peptide Precursor Plays a Novel Role in the Regulation of Energy Balance

    Seung Hahm;Tooru M. Mizuno;T.John Wu;Jonathan P. Wisor

  • Epidermal stem cells are retained in vivo throughout skin aging.

    Adam Giangreco;Mei Qin;John E Pintar;Fiona M Watt

  • Developmental expression of the mu, kappa, and delta opioid receptor mRNAs in mouse.

    Yanxin Zhu;Ming-Sing Hsu;John E. Pintar

  • Prior Activation of Kappa Opioid Receptors by U50,488 Mimics Repeated Forced Swim Stress to Potentiate Cocaine Place Preference Conditioning

    Jay P McLaughlin;Benjamin B Land;Shuang Li;John E Pintar

  • Diminished growth and enhanced glucose metabolism in triple knockout mice containing mutations of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-3, -4, and -5.

    Yun Ning;Alwin G. P. Schuller;Sheri Bradshaw;Peter Rotwein

  • IGFBP3 suppresses retinopathy through suppression of oxygen-induced vessel loss and promotion of vascular regrowth

    Chatarina Lofqvist;Jing Chen;Kip M. Connor;Alexandra C. H. Smith

  • Tissue-Specific and Developmentally Regulated Transcription of the Insulin-Like Growth Factor 2 Gene

    Alane Gray;Albert W. Tam;Thomas J. Dull;Joel Hayflick

  • The biology of Nociceptin/Orphanin FQ (N/OFQ) related to obesity, stress, anxiety, mood, and drug dependence.

    Jeffrey M. Witkin;Michael A. Statnick;Linda M. Rorick-Kehn;John E. Pintar

  • Selective Reward Deficit in Mice Lacking β-Endorphin and Enkephalin

    Michael D. Hayward;John E. Pintar;Malcolm J. Low;Malcolm J. Low

  • Genetic Dissociation of Opiate Tolerance and Physical Dependence in δ-Opioid Receptor-1 and Preproenkephalin Knock-Out Mice

    Joshua F. Nitsche;Alwin G. P. Schuller;Michael A. King;Min Zengh

  • Endogenous κ-Opioid Receptor Systems Regulate Mesoaccumbal Dopamine Dynamics and Vulnerability to Cocaine

    Vladimir I. Chefer;Traci Czyzyk;Elizabeth A. Bolan;Jose Moron

  • Neuropathic pain activates the endogenous κ opioid system in mouse spinal cord and induces opioid receptor tolerance

    Mei Xu;Michael Petraschka;Jay P. McLaughlin;Ruth E. Westenbroek

  • Truncated G protein-coupled mu opioid receptor MOR-1 splice variants are targets for highly potent opioid analgesics lacking side effects

    Susruta Majumdar;Steven Grinnell;Valerie Le Rouzic;Maxim Burgman

  • Female preproenkephalin-knockout mice display altered emotional responses

    A. Ragnauth;A. Schuller;M. Morgan;J. Chan

  • Deletion of peptide amidation enzymatic activity leads to edema and embryonic lethality in the mouse.

    Traci A. Czyzyk;Yun Ning;Ming Sing Hsu;Bonnie Peng

  • Potentiation of the D2 mutant motor phenotype in mice lacking dopamine D2 and D3 receptors

    M.-Y. Jung;B.V. Skryabin;M. Arai;S. Abbondanzo

  • The Behavioral Effects of the Antidepressant Tianeptine Require the Mu-Opioid Receptor

    Benjamin Adam Samuels;Katherine M Nautiyal;Andrew C Kruegel;Marjorie R Levinstein

Frequent Co-Authors

Gavril W. Pasternak
Gavril W. Pasternak Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Lakshmi A. Devi
Lakshmi A. Devi Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Ellen M. Unterwald
Ellen M. Unterwald Temple University
Malcolm J. Low
Malcolm J. Low University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Ian Kitchen
Ian Kitchen University of Surrey
Lloyd D. Fricker
Lloyd D. Fricker Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Betty A. Eipper
Betty A. Eipper University of Connecticut Health Center
Jonathan A. Javitch
Jonathan A. Javitch Columbia University
Grace C. Rossi
Grace C. Rossi Long Island University
Charles Chavkin
Charles Chavkin University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience can open doors to a diverse range of online degrees and career options in related fields. Many students interested in the brain and behavior find value in pursuing a cheapest online psychology degree. These programs offer flexibility and affordability while providing a strong foundation in psychological science.

For those seeking advanced roles or clinical careers, enrolling in reputable masters programs in psychology can be an excellent next step. Graduates often qualify for higher-level positions and may choose to pursue licensure.

Another in-demand option is social work, with many universities now offering msw degree online programs. This path prepares you to support individuals and communities, which complements expertise in neuroscience and psychology.

For those drawn to mental health counseling, consider a lmft degree online. This credential enables graduates to help clients improve relationships and address behavioral concerns by applying insights from the latest brain research.

Best Scientists Citing John E. Pintar

Trending Scientists