World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
74
Citations
15951
World Ranking
19502
National Ranking
9710

Edward L. Squires publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward L. Squires sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 478 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Edward L. Squires D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edward L. Squires sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Adding cholesterol to the stallion sperm plasma membrane improves cryosurvival.

    Amanda I. Moore;Edward L. Squires;James K. Graham

  • Embryo technologies in the horse.

    E.L Squires;E.M Carnevale;P.M McCue;J.E Bruemmer

  • Evaluation of alternative cryoprotectants for preserving stallion spermatozoa.

    E.L Squires;S.L Keith;J.K Graham

  • Insemination of mares with low numbers of either unsexed or sexed spermatozoa.

    B.R. Buchanan;G.E. Seidel;P.M. McCue;J.L. Schenk

  • Effect of centrifugation and partial removal of seminal plasma on equine spermatozoal motility after cooling and storage.

    S.P. Brinsko;E.C. Crockett;E.L. Squires

  • Factors affecting pregnancy rates and early embryonic death after equine embryo transfer

    E.M. Carnevale;R.J. Ramirez;E.L. Squires;M.A. Alvarenga

  • The current status of equine embryo transfer.

    E.L Squires;P.M McCue;D Vanderwall

  • Determination of temperature and cooling rate which induce cold shock in stallion spermatozoa.

    D.M. Moran;D.J. Jasko;E.L. Squires;R.P. Amann

  • Morphologic assessment of the equine embryo

    McKinnon Ao;Squires El

  • Effect of seminal plasma and egg yolk on motion characteristics of cooled stallion spermatozoa

    D.J. Jasko;J.A. Hathaway;V.L. Schaltenbrand;W.D. Simper

  • Effect of seminal plasma on the cryopreservation of equine spermatozoa

    A.I. Moore;E.L. Squires;J.K. Graham

  • Effect of seminal plasma dilution or removal on spermatozoal motion characteristics of cooled stallion semen

    D.J. Jasko;D.M. Moran;M.E. Farlin;E.L. Squires

  • Pregnancies from vitrified equine oocytes collected from super-stimulated and non-stimulated mares.

    L.J Maclellan;E.M Carnevale;M.A Coutinho da Silva;C.F Scoggin

  • Vitrification of immature and mature equine and bovine oocytes in an ethylene glycol, ficoll and sucrose solution using open-pulled straws.

    A.E. Hurtt;F. Landim-Alvarenga;G.E. Scidel;E.L. Squires

  • Collection and transfer of equine embryos.

    K J Imel;E L Squires;R P Elsden;R K Shideler

  • A new procedure for the cryopreservation of equine embryos.

    N.P. Slade;T. Takeda;E.L. Squires;R.P. Elsden

  • Seasonal variation in hypothalamic content of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), pituitary receptors for GnRH, and pituitary content of luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone in the mare.

    P J Hart;E L Squires;K J Imel;T M Nett

  • Equine Embryo Transfer

    A.O. McKinnon;E.L. Squires

  • Hysteroscopic insemination of low numbers of flow sorted fresh and frozen/thawed stallion spermatozoa

    A. C. Lindsey;J. L. Schenk;J. K. Graham;J. E. Bruemmer

  • Collection and transfer of equine embryos

    E.L. Squires

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick M. McCue
Patrick M. McCue Colorado State University
George E. Seidel
George E. Seidel Colorado State University
Mats H.T. Troedsson
Mats H.T. Troedsson University of Copenhagen
Terry M. Nett
Terry M. Nett Colorado State University
Fernando J. Peña
Fernando J. Peña University of Extremadura
Udeni B. R. Balasuriya
Udeni B. R. Balasuriya Louisiana State University
Jack A. Gilbert
Jack A. Gilbert University of California, San Diego
Laurie M. Lawrence
Laurie M. Lawrence University of Kentucky
O.J. Ginther
O.J. Ginther University of Wisconsin–Madison
Terry E. Engle
Terry E. Engle Colorado State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a medical career in the USA opens doors to many related fields beyond the traditional MD path. Prospective students often consider alternative or supporting roles in healthcare, from nursing to administration, that are accessible through flexible online education.

For those interested in nursing, a key concern is do you have to take the teas test to get into nursing school? Many online nursing schools now offer pathways that don’t require the TEAS or HESI exams, making entry more accessible for motivated applicants.

Likewise, students looking for leadership roles may pursue healthcare administration programs. These accelerated online degrees help prepare graduates for management positions within hospitals, clinics, and other healthcare settings.

Nurses aiming to advance their careers can take advantage of adn to fnp bridge programs, which conveniently allow Associate Degree Nurses to earn an MSN and become Family Nurse Practitioners through flexible online coursework.

Additionally, if you are interested in wellness and dietary health, an online degree in nutrition can lead to roles in clinical nutrition, counseling, or health coaching, providing key support in preventive medicine.

Best Scientists Citing Edward L. Squires

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles