World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Reinhold Vieth

Reinhold Vieth

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 82 15963 15016 671 636 235 29344

Reinhold Vieth publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Reinhold Vieth between 1978 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Reinhold Vieth published across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2023. 4 of the 270 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2023. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 5 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 4 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 12 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 19 publications 2007: 14 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 5 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 4 publications 2023: 24 publications 2024: 3 publications 2025: 1 publication
1978 2025

270 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Reinhold Vieth: publications per year, 1978 to 2025
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 1
1980 1
1981 0
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 2
1988 1
1989 1
1990 5
1991 2
1992 0
1993 1
1994 4
1995 5
1996 1
1997 3
1998 1
1999 2
2000 8
2001 12
2002 8
2003 5
2004 10
2005 7
2006 19
2007 14
2008 22
2009 12
2010 18
2011 17
2012 13
2013 10
2014 4
2015 5
2016 1
2017 5
2018 3
2019 4
2020 6
2021 3
2022 4
2023 24
2024 3
2025 1
Total 270
Download as CSV

Reinhold Vieth publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reinhold Vieth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 221–240 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 235 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487 235
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Reinhold Vieth D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Reinhold Vieth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027 82
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Reinhold Vieth is a researcher affiliated with the University of Toronto in Canada. Their work primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a significant focus on Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Nutrition and Dietetics, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine.

Their research interests notably cover topics such as Vitamin D Research Studies, Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research, Nutritional Studies and Diet, Bone Health and Osteoporosis Research, Diet and Metabolism Studies, Intestinal and Peritoneal Adhesions, and Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress.

Recent notable papers published by Reinhold Vieth include:

  • Vitamin D supplementation: cholecalciferol, calcifediol, and calcitriol, 2020, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Other significant related publications in the same timeframe and context but authored by different researchers include:

  • Supplemental Vitamins and Minerals for Cardiovascular Disease Prevention and Treatment, 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Individual participant data (IPD)-level meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials with vitamin D-fortified foods to estimate Dietary Reference Values for vitamin D, 2020, European Journal of Nutrition
  • Meta-Analysis of European Clinical Trials Characterizing the Healthy-Adult Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D Response to Vitamin D Supplementation, 2023, Nutrients
  • An Appraisal to Address Health Consequences of Vitamin D Deficiency With Food Fortification and Supplements: Time to Act!, 2022, Anticancer Research

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Reinhold Vieth include:

  • Thomas Vogt
  • Jörg Reichrath
  • David J.A. Jenkins
  • J. David Spence
  • Edward L. Giovannucci

Reinhold Vieth's frequent publication venues reflect their focus on clinical nutrition and related studies, including:

  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
  • Anticancer Research
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Nutrients
  • European Journal of Nutrition

Best Publications

  • Estimates of optimal vitamin D status

    Bess Dawson-Hughes;Robert P. Heaney;Michael F. Holick;Paul Lips

  • Vitamin D supplementation, 25-hydroxyvitamin D concentrations, and safety

    Reinhold Vieth

  • Epidemic influenza and vitamin D.

    J. J. Cannell;R. Vieth;J. C. Umhau;M. F. Holick

  • Risk assessment for vitamin D

    John N Hathcock;Andrew Shao;Reinhold Vieth;Robert Heaney

  • Comparison of vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 supplementation in raising serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Laura Tripkovic;Helen Lambert;Kathryn Hart;Colin P Smith

  • Evidence that vitamin D3 increases serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D more efficiently than does vitamin D2.

    Hoang M Trang;David Ec Cole;Laurence A Rubin;Andreas Pierratos

  • Efficacy and safety of vitamin D3 intake exceeding the lowest observed adverse effect level

    Reinhold Vieth;Pak-Cheung R Chan;Gordon D MacFarlane

  • The urgent need to recommend an intake of vitamin D that is effective

    Reinhold Vieth;Heike Bischoff-Ferrari;Heike Bischoff-Ferrari;Barbara J Boucher;Bess Dawson-Hughes

  • The case against ergocalciferol (vitamin D2) as a vitamin supplement

    Lisa A Houghton;Reinhold Vieth

  • Age-Related Changes in the 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Versus Parathyroid Hormone Relationship Suggest a Different Reason Why Older Adults Require More Vitamin D

    Reinhold Vieth;Yasmin Ladak;Paul G. Walfish;Paul G. Walfish

  • Association of Vitamin D With Insulin Resistance and β-Cell Dysfunction in Subjects at Risk for Type 2 Diabetes

    Sheena Kayaniyil;Reinhold Vieth;Ravi Retnakaran;Julia A. Knight;Julia A. Knight

  • A phase I/II dose-escalation trial of vitamin D3 and calcium in multiple sclerosis

    Jodie M Burton;Samantha Kimball;Reinhold Vieth;Amit Bar-Or

  • Effect of Vitamin D Replacement on Musculoskeletal Parameters in School Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Ghada El-Hajj Fuleihan;Mona Nabulsi;Hala Tamim;Joyce Maalouf

  • Why the optimal requirement for Vitamin D3 is probably much higher than what is officially recommended for adults.

    Reinhold Vieth

  • Wintertime vitamin D insufficiency is common in young Canadian women, and their vitamin D intake does not prevent it.

    R Vieth;D E Cole;G A Hawker;H M Trang

  • Clinical, environmental, and genetic determinants of multiple sclerosis in children with acute demyelination: a prospective national cohort study

    Brenda Banwell;Amit Bar-Or;Douglas L Arnold;Dessa Sadovnick

  • Rationale and plan for vitamin D food fortification: A review and guidance paper

    Stefan Pilz;Winfried März;Winfried März;Kevin D Cashman;Mairead Kiely

  • Vitamin D toxicity, policy, and science.

    Reinhold Vieth

  • Safety of vitamin D3 in adults with multiple sclerosis

    Samantha M Kimball;Melanie R Ursell;Paul O'Connor;Reinhold Vieth

  • Comparison of vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 supplementation in raising serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status: a systematic review

    Laura Tripkovic;Helen Lambert;Kathryn Hart;Colin P Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Julia A. Knight
Julia A. Knight Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute
David E. C. Cole
David E. C. Cole University of Toronto
Robert P. Heaney
Robert P. Heaney Creighton University
Gillian A. Hawker
Gillian A. Hawker University of Toronto
Dérick Rousseau
Dérick Rousseau Toronto Metropolitan University
Robert G. Josse
Robert G. Josse University of Toronto
Michael F. Holick
Michael F. Holick Boston University
Theodorus H. van der Kwast
Theodorus H. van der Kwast University Health Network
Bernard Zinman
Bernard Zinman University of Toronto
Amit Bar-Or
Amit Bar-Or University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in the healthcare field, there are several alternative and complementary online degree pathways to consider besides medical school. An attractive choice for many is enrolling in online ADN programs for non nurses, which allow students to begin a nursing career without a prior healthcare background.

If you're more interested in the administrative side of medicine, best online healthcare administration degree programs offer flexible, accelerated routes to leadership roles within hospitals and clinics.

Another popular career path is medical billing and coding. A common question is, can you get financial aid for medical billing and coding? The answer is yes—many accredited online programs offer financial assistance to qualified students.

Prospective nurses who wish to bypass standardized entry exams can explore an lpn program without teas test, broadening access to the field and streamlining the admissions process.

Each of these options offers a unique pathway to a rewarding healthcare career, tailored to your goals, schedule, and background.

Best Scientists Citing Reinhold Vieth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles