World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
51
Citations
12087
World Ranking
5171
National Ranking
542

Elizabeth J. Austin publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth J. Austin sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 107 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Elizabeth J. Austin D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth J. Austin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Elizabeth J. Austin is affiliated with the University of Edinburgh in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a concentration on epidemiology, infectious diseases, cognitive neuroscience, obstetrics and gynecology, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine.

Their body of work encompasses several key topics, including respiratory viral infections research, influenza virus research studies, pneumonia and respiratory infections, functional brain connectivity studies, respiratory support and mechanisms, congenital diaphragmatic hernia studies, and congenital heart disease studies.

Recent publications by Elizabeth J. Austin cover a range of clinical and epidemiological subjects. Notable papers include:

  • Acute Cardiac Events in Hospitalized Older Adults With Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infection, 2024, JAMA Internal Medicine
  • Shifting Epidemiology and Severity of Respiratory Syncytial Virus in Children During the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2023, JAMA Pediatrics
  • Rapid Increase in Circulation of the SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 (Delta) Variant - Mesa County, Colorado, April-June 2021, 2021, MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
  • Characteristics and Outcomes Among Adults Aged ≥60 Years Hospitalized with Laboratory-Confirmed Respiratory Syncytial Virus - RSV-NET, 12 States, July 2022-June 2023, 2023, MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report
  • Burden of Respiratory Syncytial Virus-Associated Hospitalizations in US Adults, October 2016 to September 2023, 2024, JAMA Network Open

Elizabeth J. Austin frequently publishes in several venues, indicating a specialization in infectious diseases and public health monitoring. The venues with multiple publications include Open Forum Infectious Diseases, MMWR Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), JAMA Internal Medicine, and JAMA Pediatrics.

Their work involves collaborations with several coauthors who have contributed to multiple projects, including:

  • Pam Daily Kirley
  • Kyle P. Openo
  • Melissa Sutton
  • H. Keipp Talbot
  • Nisha B. Alden

The scope of Elizabeth J. Austin's research extends over epidemiological studies of respiratory viruses, including respiratory syncytial virus and influenza, with an emphasis on understanding disease severity, circulation patterns, and hospital outcomes. Their interdisciplinary approach also covers functional brain connectivity and congenital disease studies, combining clinical and neuroscientific perspectives.

Best Publications

  • Personality, well-being and health correlates of trait emotional intelligence

    Elizabeth J. Austin;Donald H. Saklofske;Vincent Egan

  • Factor structure and validity of a trait emotional intelligence measure

    Donald H. Saklofske;Elizabeth J. Austin;Paul S. Minski

  • Emotional intelligence, Machiavellianism and emotional manipulation: Does EI have a dark side?

    Elizabeth J. Austin;Daniel Farrelly;Carolyn Black;Helen Moore

  • Personality correlates of the broader autism phenotype as assessed by the Autism Spectrum Quotient (AQ)

    Elizabeth J. Austin

  • Measurement of trait emotional intelligence: testing and cross-validating a modified version of Schutte et al.'s (1998) measure

    Elizabeth J Austin;Donald H Saklofske;Sandra H.S Huang;Deanne McKenney

  • Farmers' Attitudes, Objectives, Behaviors, and Personality Traits: The Edinburgh Study of Decision Making on Farms.

    Joyce Willock;Ian J. Deary;Murray M. McGregor;Alister Sutherland

  • The SAGE Handbook of Personality Theory and Assessment

    Elizabeth Austin;J. D. A. Parker;K. V. Petrides;D. H. Saklofske

  • Individual difference correlates of health-related behaviours: Preliminary evidence for links between emotional intelligence and coping.

    Donald H. Saklofske;Elizabeth J. Austin;Josie Galloway;Kammy Davidson

  • Relationships of personality, affect, emotional intelligence and coping with student stress and academic success: Different patterns of association for stress and success

    Donald H. Saklofske;Elizabeth J. Austin;Sarah M. Mastoras;Laura Beaton

  • A preliminary study of emotional intelligence, empathy and exam performance in first year medical students ☆

    Elizabeth J. Austin;Phillip Evans;Ruth Goldwater;Victoria Potter

  • Intelligence and the differentiation hypothesis

    Ian J. Deary;Vincent Egan;Gavin J. Gibson;Elizabeth J. Austin

  • A preliminary study of empathy, emotional intelligence and examination performance in MBChB students

    Elizabeth J Austin;Phillip Evans;Belinda Magnus;Katie O'Hanlon

  • The Narcissistic Personality Inventory: factor structure in a non-clinical sample

    Thomas S. Kubarych;Ian J. Deary;Elizabeth J. Austin

  • The NEO-FFI: emerging British norms and an item-level analysis suggest N, A and C are more reliable than O and E

    Vincent Egan;Ian Deary;Elizabeth Austin

  • A preliminary investigation of the associations between personality, cognitive ability and digit ratio

    Elizabeth J Austin;John T Manning;Katherine McInroy;Elizabeth Mathews

  • Associations of personality and emotional intelligence with display rule perceptions and emotional labour

    Elizabeth J. Austin;Timothy C.P. Dore;Katharine M. O’Donovan

  • Relationships between ability and personality:does intelligence contribute positively to personal and social adjustment?

    Elizabeth J Austin;Ian J Deary;Martha C Whiteman;F.G.R Fowkes

  • Emotional intelligence, coping and exam-related stress in Canadian undergraduate students

    Elizabeth J. Austin;Donald H. Saklofske;Sarah M. Mastoras

  • Personality, Emotional Intelligence and Exercise

    Donald H Saklofske;Elizabeth J Austin;Betty A Rohr;Jac J W Andrews

  • The reliability of Riding’s Cognitive Style Analysis test

    Elizabeth R Peterson;Ian J Deary;Elizabeth J Austin

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian J. Deary
Ian J. Deary University of Edinburgh
Donald H. Saklofske
Donald H. Saklofske University of Western Ontario
Vincent Egan
Vincent Egan University of Nottingham
John M. Starr
John M. Starr University of Edinburgh
Gerald Matthews
Gerald Matthews George Mason University
Gareth Edwards-Jones
Gareth Edwards-Jones Bangor University
Moshe Zeidner
Moshe Zeidner University of Haifa
Pamela Qualter
Pamela Qualter University of Manchester
Jon Oberlander
Jon Oberlander University of Edinburgh
James D. A. Parker
James D. A. Parker Trent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens doors to many rewarding career paths, particularly in mental health counseling. With the rise of online education, students can now pursue relevant degrees and certifications remotely, gaining skills needed to meet diverse licensure requirements across the USA.

Becoming a mental health counselor is a popular pathway. However, requirements often vary by location. For instance, how to become a mental health counselor in New Orleans may look different from the New York City mental health counselor education requirements. Newark and Norfolk have their own unique standards, as seen in the Newark mental health counselor education requirements and guidance on how to become a mental health counselor in Norfolk.

When considering online degrees, be sure your chosen program aligns with your state’s regulations. By understanding these key differences and opportunities, you can tailor your studies to build a successful—and meaningful—career in mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth J. Austin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles