World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 60 9705 8781 552 495 220 12629

Jonathan M. Goodman publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jonathan M. Goodman between 1987 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jonathan M. Goodman published across 40 years, from 1987 to 2026, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 19 publications in 2023. 13 of the 263 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 19. Peak 19 publications in 2023. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 13 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 12 publications 2026: 1 publication
1987 2026

263 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jonathan M. Goodman: publications per year, 1987 to 2026
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 0
1989 3
1990 4
1991 2
1992 6
1993 3
1994 5
1995 5
1996 2
1997 7
1998 2
1999 5
2000 4
2001 11
2002 5
2003 9
2004 9
2005 7
2006 6
2007 8
2008 10
2009 14
2010 7
2011 4
2012 7
2013 8
2014 5
2015 5
2016 6
2017 6
2018 7
2019 3
2020 14
2021 13
2022 10
2023 19
2024 8
2025 12
2026 1
Total 263
Download as CSV

Jonathan M. Goodman publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan M. Goodman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 220 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281 220
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Jonathan M. Goodman D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan M. Goodman sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60–61 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882 60
62–63 834
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Bader Award, Royal Society of Chemistry (UK)

Overview

Jonathan M. Goodman is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their primary field of study is Chemistry, supported by a body of 54 publications. The research spans multiple subfields, including Organic Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Spectroscopy, and Materials Chemistry.

The scientist's work focuses on several main topics related to chemistry and computational methods. These include:

  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods
  • Molecular spectroscopy and chirality
  • Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Radical Photochemical Reactions
  • Asymmetric Synthesis and Catalysis
  • Asymmetric Hydrogenation and Catalysis

Jonathan M. Goodman has authored research published in notable venues as follows:

  • Chemical Science (6 publications)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (6 publications)
  • Environmental Health Perspectives (3 publications)
  • Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry (3 publications)
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling (3 publications)

The collaboration network of the scientist includes frequent co-authors such as:

  • Timothy E. H. Allen
  • Kristaps Ermanis
  • Sanha Lee
  • Ching Ching Lam
  • Andrew J. Wedlake

Some recent research papers authored by Jonathan M. Goodman include:

  • "A review of molecular representation in the age of machine learning", 2022, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science
  • "DP4-AI automated NMR data analysis: straight from spectrometer to structure", 2020, Chemical Science
  • "CATMoS: Collaborative Acute Toxicity Modeling Suite", 2021, Environmental Health Perspectives
  • "Machine Learning in Predictive Toxicology: Recent Applications and Future Directions for Classification Models", 2020, Chemical Research in Toxicology
  • "A Computational and Experimental Investigation of the Origin of Selectivity in the Chiral Phosphoric Acid Catalyzed Enantioselective Minisci Reaction", 2020, Journal of the American Chemical Society

The researcher was awarded the Bader Award by the Royal Society of Chemistry (UK) in 2013.

Best Publications

  • Assigning Stereochemistry to Single Diastereoisomers by GIAO NMR Calculation: The DP4 Probability

    Steven G. Smith;Jonathan M. Goodman

  • The molecular basis for selective inhibition of unconventional mRNA splicing by an IRE1-binding small molecule

    Benedict C. S. Cross;Peter J. Bond;Pawel G. Sadowski;Babal Kant Jha

  • Polymorph control: past, present and future.

    Antonio Llinàs;Jonathan M. Goodman

  • Enantio- and diastereoselective aldol reactions of achiral ethyl and methyl ketones with aldehydes: the use of enol diisopinocampheylborinates

    Ian Paterson;Jonathan M. Goodman;M. Anne Lister;Russell C. Schumann

  • Theoretical Study of the Mechanism of Hantzsch Ester Hydrogenation of Imines Catalyzed by Chiral BINOL-Phosphoric Acids

    Luis Simón;Jonathan M. Goodman

  • Assigning the stereochemistry of pairs of diastereoisomers using GIAO NMR shift calculation.

    Steven G. Smith;Jonathan M. Goodman

  • An unbounded systematic search of conformational space

    Jonathan M. Goodman;W. Clark Still

  • How reliable are DFT transition structures? Comparison of GGA, hybrid-meta-GGA and meta-GGA functionals.

    Luis Simón;Jonathan M. Goodman

  • The mechanism of TBD-catalyzed ring-opening polymerization of cyclic esters.

    Luis Simón;Jonathan M Goodman

  • Aldol reactions in polypropionate synthesis: High π-face selectivity of enol borinates from α-chiral methyl and ethyl ketones under substrate control

    Ian Paterson;Jonathan M. Goodman;Masahiko Isaka

  • Hydrogen Bonding and π-Stacking: How Reliable are Force Fields? A Critical Evaluation of Force Field Descriptions of Nonbonded Interactions

    Robert S. Paton;Jonathan M. Goodman

  • Solubility Challenge : Can You Predict Solubilities of 32 Molecules Using a Database of 100 Reliable Measurements?

    Antonio Llinàs;Robert C. Glen;Jonathan M. Goodman

  • A Model for the Enantioselectivity of Imine Reactions Catalyzed by BINOL−Phosphoric Acid Catalysts

    Luis Simón;Jonathan M. Goodman

  • Defining molecular initiating events in the adverse outcome pathway framework for risk assessment.

    Timothy E. H. Allen;Jonathan M. Goodman;Steve Gutsell;Paul J. Russell

  • A Practical Guide for Predicting the Stereochemistry of Bifunctional Phosphoric Acid Catalyzed Reactions of Imines

    Jolene P. Reid;Luis Simón;Jonathan M. Goodman

  • 10-Helical conformations in oxetane β-amino acid hexamers

    Timothy D.W Claridge;Jonathan M Goodman;Andres Moreno;Donald Angus

  • Mechanistic insights into the BINOL-derived phosphoric acid-catalyzed asymmetric allylboration of aldehydes.

    Matthew N. Grayson;Silvina C. Pellegrinet;Jonathan M. Goodman

  • Diclofenac Solubility: Independent Determination of the Intrinsic Solubility of Three Crystal Forms

    Antonio Llinàs;Jonathan C Burley;Karl J Box;Robert C Glen

  • DP4-AI automated NMR data analysis: straight from spectrometer to structure

    Alexander Howarth;Kristaps Ermanis;Jonathan M. Goodman

  • Site-specific examination of secondary structure and orientation determination in membrane proteins: the peptidic (13)C=(18)O group as a novel infrared probe.

    Jaume Torres;Andreas Kukol;Jonathan M. Goodman;Isaiah T. Arkin

  • DFT study on the factors determining the enantioselectivity of Friedel-Crafts reactions of indole with N-acyl and N-tosylimines catalyzed by BINOL-phosphoric acid derivatives.

    Luis Simón;Jonathan M. Goodman

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian Paterson
Ian Paterson University of Cambridge
Cesare Gennari
Cesare Gennari University of Milan
Anna Bernardi
Anna Bernardi University of Milan
Maxim V. Fedorov
Maxim V. Fedorov Skolkovo Institute of Science and Technology
Robert S. Paton
Robert S. Paton Colorado State University
Angiolina Comotti
Angiolina Comotti University of Milano-Bicocca
Dominic S. Wright
Dominic S. Wright University of Cambridge
Paul R. Raithby
Paul R. Raithby University of Bath
Andrew B. Holmes
Andrew B. Holmes University of Melbourne
Ian H. Gilbert
Ian H. Gilbert University of Dundee

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to several related fields that combine science with practical applications. For students interested in legal aspects, pursuing a paralegal studies associate degree can provide foundational knowledge supporting roles in patent law or environmental regulations.

The pharmaceutical industry is another vibrant path for Chemistry graduates. Those inclined towards business and communication often explore careers as pharmaceutical sales representatives, where understanding chemical compounds is invaluable. Insights into the pharmaceutical sales salary and career paths highlight the growth potential in this sector.

For more science-focused roles, becoming a pharmacist remains a highly respected option. The detailed steps to become a pharmacist provide a clear roadmap for Chemistry students aiming for advanced professional credentials and clinical work.

Additionally, careers like an autopsy technician utilize chemical analysis skills in forensic settings. Understanding the education, salary, and job outlook for an autopsy tech offers insight into these specialized scientific roles.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan M. Goodman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles