World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
54
Citations
26172
World Ranking
4483
National Ranking
247

Stanley V. Catts publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley V. Catts sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 198 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Stanley V. Catts D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stanley V. Catts sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stanley V. Catts is affiliated with the University of Queensland in Australia. Their research spans several fields, primarily focusing on biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with significant contributions also in medicine and neuroscience.

Their work covers subfields including genetics, cognitive neuroscience, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, psychiatry, and molecular biology. The main topics explored in their research involve functional brain connectivity studies, advanced neuroimaging techniques and applications, genetic associations and epidemiology, genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities, genomics and rare diseases, schizophrenia research and treatment, and mental health research topics.

Stanley V. Catts has published frequently in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • UNC Libraries
  • Molecular Psychiatry
  • Nature Neuroscience

They have co-authored extensively with several researchers, including:

  • Vaughan J. Carr
  • Melissa J. Green
  • Bryan Mowry
  • Frans Henskens
  • Christos Pantelis

Recent notable papers by Stanley V. Catts include:

  • Mapping genomic loci implicates genes and synaptic biology in schizophrenia, 2022, Nature
  • Increased power by harmonizing structural MRI site differences with the ComBat batch adjustment method in ENIGMA, 2020, NeuroImage
  • A Comparison of Ten Polygenic Score Methods for Psychiatric Disorders Applied Across Multiple Cohorts, 2021, Biological Psychiatry
  • Brain ageing in schizophrenia: evidence from 26 international cohorts via the ENIGMA Schizophrenia consortium, 2022, Molecular Psychiatry
  • Interaction Testing and Polygenic Risk Scoring to Estimate the Association of Common Genetic Variants With Treatment Resistance in Schizophrenia, 2022, JAMA Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • Biological insights from 108 schizophrenia-associated genetic loci

    Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Benjamin M. Neale;Benjamin M. Neale;Aiden Corvin;James T. R. Walters

  • Genome-wide association study identifies five new schizophrenia loci

    Stephan Ripke;Alan R. Sanders;Kenneth S. Kendler;Douglas F. Levinson

  • Modeling Linkage Disequilibrium Increases Accuracy of Polygenic Risk Scores

    Bjarni J. Vilhjálmsson;Jian Yang;Hilary K. Finucane;Alexander Gusev

  • Genome-wide association study of more than 40,000 bipolar disorder cases provides new insights into the underlying biology

    Niamh Mullins;Andreas J. Forstner;Andreas J. Forstner;Andreas J. Forstner;Kevin S. O'Connell;Kevin S. O'Connell;Brandon Coombes

  • Contribution of copy number variants to schizophrenia from a genome-wide study of 41,321 subjects

    Christian R Marshall;Daniel P Howrigan;Daniel P Howrigan;Daniele Merico;Bhooma Thiruvahindrapuram

  • Genomic Dissection of Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia, Including 28 Subphenotypes

    Douglas M. Ruderfer;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Stephan Ripke;Andrew McQuillin;James Boocock

  • Widespread white matter microstructural differences in schizophrenia across 4322 individuals : results from the ENIGMA Schizophrenia DTI Working Group

    S. Kelly;S. Kelly;N. Jahanshad;A. Zalesky;P. Kochunov

  • Mismatch negativity: an index of a preattentive processing deficit in schizophrenia.

    A.M. Shelley;P.B. Ward;S.V. Catts;P.T. Michie

  • Brain potential evidence for an auditory sensory memory deficit in schizophrenia.

    Stanley V. Catts;Anne-Marie Shelley;Philip B. Ward;Barbara Liebert

  • International clinical practice guidelines for early psychosis

    J. Addington;G. P. Amminger;A. Barbato;S. Catts

  • Disturbed communication in schizophrenia: the role of poor pragmatics and poor mind-reading.

    R. Langdon;M. Coltheart;P. B. Ward;S. V. Catts

  • Defective Self and/or Other Mentalising in Schizophrenia: A Cognitive Neuropsychological Approach

    Robyn Langdon;Patricia T. Michie;Philip B. Ward;Neil McConaghy

  • Elevated peripheral cytokines characterize a subgroup of people with schizophrenia displaying poor verbal fluency and reduced Broca’s area volume

    S G Fillman;S G Fillman;T W Weickert;T W Weickert;R K Lenroot;R K Lenroot;S V Catts;S V Catts;S V Catts

  • Molecular evidence of N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor hypofunction in schizophrenia.

    C S Weickert;S J Fung;S J Fung;V S Catts;V S Catts;P R Schofield;P R Schofield

  • Cancer incidence in patients with schizophrenia and their first-degree relatives - a meta-analysis.

    V. S. Catts;S. V. Catts;S. V. Catts;B. I. O’Toole;A. D. J. Frost

  • Increased power by harmonizing structural MRI site differences with the ComBat batch adjustment method in ENIGMA.

    Joaquim Radua;Eduard Vieta;Russell Shinohara;Peter Kochunov

  • Mentalising, executive planning and disengagement in schizophrenia

    Robyn Langdon;Max Coltheart;Philip B. Ward;Stanley V. Catts

  • Trauma, PTSD, and physical health: an epidemiological study of Australian Vietnam veterans.

    Brian I. O'Toole;Stanley V. Catts

  • A Comparison of Ten Polygenic Score Methods for Psychiatric Disorders Applied Across Multiple Cohorts

    Guiyan Ni;Jian Zeng;Joana A. Revez;Ying Wang

  • Apoptosis and schizophrenia: is the tumour suppressor gene, p53, a candidate susceptibility gene?

    Vibeke Sørensen Catts;Stanley Victor Catts

  • Auditory selective attention and event-related potentials in schizophrenia.

    Philip B. Ward;Stanley V. Catts;Allison M. Fox;Patricia T. Michie

Frequent Co-Authors

Philip B. Ward
Philip B. Ward University of New South Wales
Patricia T. Michie
Patricia T. Michie University of Newcastle Australia
Vaughan J. Carr
Vaughan J. Carr University of New South Wales
Ulrich Schall
Ulrich Schall University of Newcastle Australia
Christos Pantelis
Christos Pantelis University of Melbourne
Bryan J. Mowry
Bryan J. Mowry University of Queensland
Thomas W. Weickert
Thomas W. Weickert SUNY Upstate Medical University
Assen Jablensky
Assen Jablensky University of Western Australia
Carmel M. Loughland
Carmel M. Loughland University of Newcastle Australia
Rodney J. Scott
Rodney J. Scott University of Newcastle Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens doors to diverse career opportunities, including the field of speech-language pathology. Many aspiring professionals choose online degrees as a flexible pathway to these rewarding careers. Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) work with individuals of all ages to assess, diagnose, and treat communication and swallowing disorders.

The path to becoming a speech therapist in Maryland involves completing a master's degree in speech-language pathology, passing the Praxis exam, and obtaining state licensure. Each state has its own requirements for practice. For example, slp requirements in Massachusetts include supervised clinical experience and successful completion of national exams.

Similarly, Michigan speech pathologist certification requirements require applicants to graduate from an accredited program and fulfill clinical fellowship hours. Those considering Minnesota can learn more about how to become a speech language pathologist in Minnesota, including state-specific licensure steps.

Choosing the right online degree can help you meet these varying requirements, making it easier to pursue your desired SLP career in any state.

Best Scientists Citing Stanley V. Catts

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles