World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
4298
World Ranking
10592
National Ranking
1032

Ana V. Nikčević publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ana V. Nikčević sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 101 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Ana V. Nikčević D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ana V. Nikčević sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ana V. Nikčević is affiliated with Kingston University in the United Kingdom and specializes primarily in the field of Psychology, with a focus on clinical and experimental subfields. Their research covers a broad spectrum of psychological topics and has a strong emphasis on anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment approaches, and cognitive processes.

The main subjects of their work include:

  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Mental Health Research Topics
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions

Their publication record extends predominantly across clinical psychology and psychiatry-related journals. Frequent publication venues comprise:

  • Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
  • Journal of Affective Disorders
  • PsycTESTS Dataset
  • Psychiatry Research
  • Addictive Behaviors Reports

Significant recent papers by Ana V. Nikčević include:

  • "Modelling the contribution of the Big Five personality traits, health anxiety, and COVID-19 psychological distress to generalised anxiety and depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic," 2020, Journal of Affective Disorders
  • "The COVID-19 anxiety syndrome scale: Development and psychometric properties," 2020, Psychiatry Research
  • "The COVID-19 anxiety syndrome and selective attentional bias towards COVID-19-related stimuli in UK residents during the 2020-2021 pandemic," 2021, Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
  • "The relationship between fear of COVID-19 and health anxiety among families with COVID-19 infected: The mediating role of metacognitions, intolerance of uncertainty and emotion regulation," 2021, Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy
  • "The Italian COVID-19 Anxiety Syndrome Scale: Investigation of the COVID-19 anxiety syndrome and its association with psychological symptoms in an Italian population," 2022, Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy

Ana V. Nikčević frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Marcantonio M. Spada
  • Daniel C. Kolubinski
  • Giovanni Mansueto
  • Sara Palmieri
  • Mehdi Akbari

The research interests extend into subfields such as Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Applied Psychology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Cognitive Neuroscience. The incorporation of COVID-19 related mental health challenges is a notable aspect of the scholar's recent research trajectory, reflecting trends in contemporary psychological inquiry and public health concerns.

Best Publications

  • Modelling the contribution of the Big Five personality traits, health anxiety, and COVID-19 psychological distress to generalised anxiety and depressive symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Ana V. Nikčević;Claudia Marino;Daniel C. Kolubinski;Dawn Leach

  • Metacognition, perceived stress, and negative emotion

    Marcantonio M. Spada;Ana V. Nikčević;Giovanni B. Moneta;Adrian Wells;Adrian Wells

  • Metacognition in addictive behaviors

    Marcantonio M. Spada;Gabriele Caselli;Ana V. Nikčević;Adrian Wells

  • The role of metacognitions in problematic Internet use

    Marcantonio M. Spada;Benjamin Langston;Ana V. Nikčević;Giovanni B. Moneta

  • Metacognitions, emotions, and procrastination

    Marcantonio M. Spada;Kalliopi Hiou;Ana V. Nikcevic

  • The COVID-19 anxiety syndrome scale: Development and psychometric properties.

    Ana V. Nikčević;Marcantonio M. Spada

  • Metacognition as a mediator of the relationship between emotion and smoking dependence

    Marcantonio M. Spada;Ana V. Nikčević;Giovanni B. Moneta;Adrian Wells;Adrian Wells

  • The influence of medical and psychological interventions on women's distress after miscarriage

    Ana V. Nikčević;Andrzej R. Kuczmierczyk;Kypros H. Nicolaides

  • Metacognition as a Mediator of the Effect of Test Anxiety on a Surface Approach to Studying

    Marcantonio M. Spada;Ana V. Nikcevic;Giovanni B. Moneta;Judy Ireson

  • Investigation of the cause of miscarriage and its influence on women's psychological distress.

    Ana V. Nikcevic;Sarah A. Tinkel;Andrzej R. Kuczmierczyk;Kypros H. Nicolaides

  • Personality, motives and metacognitions as predictors of problematic Facebook Use in university students

    Claudia Marino;Claudia Marino;Alessio Vieno;Antony C. Moss;Gabriele Caselli

  • A Metacognitive model of procrastination

    Bruce A. Fernie;Bruce A. Fernie;Zinnia Bharucha;Ana V. Nikčević;Claudia Marino

  • Early Childhood Experiences and Current Emotional Distress: What Do They Tell Us About Aspiring Psychologists?

    Ana V. Nikčević;Jana Kramolisova-Advani;Marcantonio M. Spada

  • A systematic review and meta-analysis of CBT interventions based on the Fennell model of low self-esteem.

    Daniel C. Kolubinski;Daniel Frings;Ana V. Nikčević;Jacqueline A. Lawrence

  • Psychological outcomes following missed abortions and provision of follow-up care

    A. V. Nikcevic;S. A. Tunkel;K. H. Nicolaides

  • Metacognitions, Emotions, and Procrastination

    Unknown

  • Parental overprotection and metacognitions as predictors of worry and anxiety.

    Marcantonio M. Spada;Gabriele Caselli;Chiara Manfredi;Daniela Rebecchi

  • Personality and alcohol metacognitions as predictors of weekly levels of alcohol use in binge drinking university students

    Ailsa Clark;Cathy Tran;Alexander Weiss;Gabriele Caselli

  • Desire Thinking as a Predictor of Problematic Internet Use

    Marcantonio M. Spada;Gabriele Caselli;Manuel Slaifer;Ana V. Nikčević

  • The COVID-19 anxiety syndrome and selective attentional bias towards COVID-19-related stimuli in UK residents during the 2020-2021 pandemic.

    Ian P Albery;Marcantonio M Spada;Ana V Nikčević

  • Emotion Regulation and Desire Thinking as Predictors of Problematic Facebook Use

    Claudia Marino;Claudia Marino;Gabriele Caselli;Michela Lenzi;Maria Grazia Monaci

Frequent Co-Authors

Marcantonio M. Spada
Marcantonio M. Spada London South Bank University
Gabriele Caselli
Gabriele Caselli London South Bank University
Adrian Wells
Adrian Wells University of Manchester
Kypros H. Nicolaides
Kypros H. Nicolaides King's College London
Alessio Vieno
Alessio Vieno University of Padua
Alexander Weiss
Alexander Weiss University of Edinburgh

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees can open many doors to fulfilling mental health careers. These flexible programs allow students to balance studies with work or family, and help prepare them for roles such as mental health counselor, school psychologist, or clinical social worker.

Regardless of your location in the USA, requirements to become a counselor tend to follow similar patterns. Most states require at least a master’s degree in counseling or psychology, supervised clinical experience, and a passing score on a national licensing exam.

However, details can vary. For example, those interested in Bakersfield mental health counselor certification requirements must meet specific California state criteria. In Maryland, you’ll need to research Baltimore mental health counselor education requirements to ensure your program and hours align with licensing laws. Interested in the Pacific Northwest? Learn how to become a mental health counselor in Boise for insights on Idaho’s process. For those drawn to Massachusetts, discover how to become a mental health counselor in Boston to get a sense of regional expectations.

Pursuing an online degree tailored to your career goal—and understanding state-specific requirements—can help you pave the way toward professional success in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Ana V. Nikčević

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles