World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Peter A. Taylor

Peter A. Taylor

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
56
Citations
9652
World Ranking
3710
National Ranking
151

Peter A. Taylor publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter A. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 194 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Peter A. Taylor D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter A. Taylor sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter A. Taylor is affiliated with York University in Canada and has contributed to research primarily in the fields of Earth and Planetary Sciences and Environmental Science. Their work spans multiple subfields, notably Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Engineering, Oceanography, and Earth-Surface Processes.

The scientist's main research topics include Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, Precipitation Measurement and Analysis, Aeolian Processes and Effects, Atmospheric Aerosols and Clouds, Ocean Waves and Remote Sensing, Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes, and Flood Risk Assessment and Management.

Recent publications by Peter A. Taylor demonstrate engagement with atmospheric and environmental sciences. These papers include:

  • "Boundary-Layer Flow Over Complex Topography" (2020) in Boundary-Layer Meteorology
  • "Optimizing Radar-Based Rainfall Estimation Using Machine Learning Models" (2022) in Remote Sensing
  • "Surface deposition of marine fog and its treatment in the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model" (2021) in Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
  • "Studies of relative contributions of internal gravity waves and 2-D turbulence to tropospheric and lower-stratospheric temporal wind spectra measured by a network of VHF windprofiler radars using a decade-long data set in Canada" (2021) in Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
  • "Fatima-GB: Searching Clarity within Marine Fog" (2025) in Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Peter A. Taylor include George A. Isaac, Diar Hassan, Daniel Michelson, Soudeh Afsharian, and T. Bullock.

Peter A. Taylor's work has been published several times in specific venues, with the most frequent being Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics and Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. Other publication venues include Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), Boundary-Layer Meteorology, and Remote Sensing.

Best Publications

  • H2O at the Phoenix landing site.

    P. H. Smith;L. K. Tamppari;R. E. Arvidson;D. Bass

  • Single-Column Model Intercomparison for a Stably Stratified Atmospheric Boundary Layer

    J Cuxart;A A M Holtslag;R J Beare;E Bazile

  • The Fog Remote Sensing and Modeling Field Project

    Ismail Gultepe;G. Pearson;J. A. Milbrandt;B. Hansen

  • The Askervein Hill project: Overview and background data

    P. A. Taylor;H. W. Teunissen

  • Boundary-layer flow over low hills

    P. A. Taylor;P. J. Mason;E. F. Bradley

  • Mars Water-Ice Clouds and Precipitation

    J. A. Whiteway;L. Komguem;C. Dickinson;C. Cook

  • A mixed spectral finite-difference model for neutrally stratified boundary-layer flow over roughness changes and topography

    A. C. M. Beljaars;J. L. Walmsley;P. A. Taylor

  • Theoretical studies on the coexistence of competing species under continuous-flow conditions.

    P. A. Taylor;P. J. LeB. Williams

  • A numerical model of the air flow above water waves

    P. R. Gent;P. A. Taylor

  • Simple guidelines for estimating wind speed variations due to small scale topographic features

    P. A Taylor;R. J Lee

  • A simple model of neutrally stratified boundary-layer flow over complex terrain with surface roughness modulations (MS3DJH/3R)

    J. L. Walmsley;P. A. Taylor;T. Keith

  • The Nature, Theory, and Modeling of Atmospheric Planetary Boundary Layers

    Alexander A. Baklanov;Branko Grisogono;Robert Bornstein;Larry Mahrt

  • On the application of a model of boundary-layer flow over low hills to real terrain

    John L. Walmsley;J. R. Salmon;P. A. Taylor

  • Turbulent boundary-layer flow over fixed aerodynamically rough two-dimensional sinusoidal waves

    W. Gong;Peter A. Taylor;Andreas Dörnbrack

  • Comments and further analysis on effective roughness lengths for use in numerical three-dimensional models

    Peter A. Taylor

  • The Thermodynamic Effects of Sublimating, Blowing Snow in the Atmospheric Boundary Layer

    Peter Taylor

  • A simple model of neutrally stratified boundary-layer flow over real terrain incorporating wavenumber-dependent scaling

    P. A. Taylor;J. L. Walmsley;J. R. Salmon

  • Convective vortices and dust devils at the Phoenix Mars mission landing site

    M. D. Ellehoj;H. P. Gunnlaugsson;P. A. Taylor;H. Kahanpää

  • Internal Boundary Layers: I. Height Formulae for Neutral and Diabatic Flows

    Sergiy A. Savelyev;Peter A. Taylor

  • Introduction to special section on the Phoenix Mission: Landing Site Characterization Experiments, Mission Overviews, and Expected Science

    P. H. Smith;L. Tamppari;R. E. Arvidson;D. Bass

  • Cooling lakes while the world warms: Effects of forest regrowth and increased dissolved organic matter on the thermal regime of a temperate, urban lake

    J Tanentzap Andrew;D Yan Norman;Bill Keller;Robert Girard

  • The Askervein hill project: A finite control volume prediction of three-dimensional flows over the hill

    G. D. Raithby;G. D. Stubley;P. A. Taylor

Frequent Co-Authors

James A. Whiteway
James A. Whiteway York University
Mark T. Lemmon
Mark T. Lemmon Space Science Institute
Clive Dickinson
Clive Dickinson University of Manchester
David A. Fisher
David A. Fisher University of Ottawa
Nilton O. Renno
Nilton O. Renno University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Leiming Zhang
Leiming Zhang Environment and Climate Change Canada
Morten Madsen
Morten Madsen University of Copenhagen
Thomas J. Duck
Thomas J. Duck Dalhousie University
David C. Catling
David C. Catling University of Washington
Bruce A. Cantor
Bruce A. Cantor Malin Space Science Systems (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career opportunities that often intersect with other fields such as public administration, sociology, and technology. For example, geographic information systems (GIS) play a critical role in environmental management by analyzing spatial data. Students interested in advanced technical skills can explore best gis graduate programs to deepen their expertise.

Environmental professionals often engage with public policies and community projects, making an understanding of governance essential. Online programs like the best online masters in public administration can equip students with the leadership skills needed to influence environmental legislation and manage public resources effectively.

Additionally, understanding social dynamics is key to addressing environmental challenges. Taking an online sociology degree can provide valuable insights into human behavior and social structures. Resources such as the sociology bachelor degree online offer flexible learning options for those interested in this angle.

For those aiming at academic or high-level research positions, advanced degrees are an option. Completing a doctorate without a dissertation is possible through select programs, and exploring the doctorate degree online no dissertation category can reveal pathways to achieve this while balancing professional commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Peter A. Taylor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles