World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Giulia Fioravanti

Giulia Fioravanti

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 35 9972 9338 222 218 106 4042

Giulia Fioravanti publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Giulia Fioravanti between 2010 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Giulia Fioravanti published across 16 years, from 2010 to 2025, averaging 8.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2022. 24 of the 133 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2010 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2022. 2010: 3 publications 2011: 1 publication 2012: 10 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 20 publications 2023: 11 publications 2024: 13 publications 2025: 11 publications
2010 2025

133 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Giulia Fioravanti: publications per year, 2010 to 2025
Year Publications
2010 3
2011 1
2012 10
2013 6
2014 5
2015 7
2016 9
2017 4
2018 5
2019 4
2020 8
2021 16
2022 20
2023 11
2024 13
2025 11
Total 133
Download as CSV

Giulia Fioravanti publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giulia Fioravanti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 101–110 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 106 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736 106
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Giulia Fioravanti D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Giulia Fioravanti sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 35
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Giulia Fioravanti is affiliated with the University of Florence in Italy and specializes in the fields of psychology and social sciences. Their research spans a variety of subfields including clinical psychology, sociology and political science, social psychology, education, and experimental and cognitive psychology. The primary focus areas of their work include the impact of technology on adolescents, eating disorders and behaviors, child development and digital technology, as well as perfectionism, procrastination, and anxiety studies. Other significant topics covered in their research are digital mental health interventions, social media and politics, and sexuality, behavior, and technology.

Fioravanti has contributed to multiple scientific papers, with notable publications including:

  • Fear of missing out and social networking sites use and abuse: A meta-analysis, 2021, Computers in Human Behavior
  • How the Exposure to Beauty Ideals on Social Networking Sites Influences Body Image: A Systematic Review of Experimental Studies, 2022, Adolescent Research Review
  • Examining the impact of daily exposure to body-positive and fitspiration Instagram content on young women's mood and body image: An intensive longitudinal study, 2021, New Media & Society

Fioravanti frequently collaborates with a group of co-authors including Silvia Casale, Sara Bocci Benucci, Francesco Rotella, Simon Ghinassi, and Valdo Ricca. This collaborative network has contributed to a significant number of joint publications.

The scientist's work has been published repeatedly in several key venues such as The Journal of Sexual Medicine, PsycTESTS Dataset, Addictive Behaviors, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, and Current Psychology.

With a substantial body of work covering 78 publications in psychology and 66 in social sciences, Fioravanti's research demonstrates a strong interdisciplinary approach. Their contributions have addressed both theoretical and applied aspects, particularly focusing on how technology and social media influence psychological well-being, body image, and behavioral patterns among adolescents and young adults.

Best Publications

  • The Role of Life Events and HPA Axis in Anxiety Disorders: A Review

    Carlo Faravelli;Carolina Lo Sauro;Lorenzo Lelli;Francesco Pietrini

  • Fear of missing out and social networking sites use and abuse: A meta-analysis

    Giulia Fioravanti;Silvia Casale;Sara Bocci Benucci;Alfonso Prostamo

  • Exploring the role of positive metacognitions in explaining the association between the fear of missing out and social media addiction

    Silvia Casale;Laura Rugai;Giulia Fioravanti

  • Childhood stressful events, HPA axis and anxiety disorders

    Carlo Faravelli;Carolina Lo Sauro;Lucia Godini;Lorenzo Lelli

  • Adolescent Internet addiction: testing the association between self-esteem, the perception of Internet attributes, and preference for online social interactions.

    Giulia Fioravanti;Davide Dèttore;Silvia Casale

  • Why narcissists are at risk for developing Facebook addiction: The need to be admired and the need to belong.

    Silvia Casale;Giulia Fioravanti

  • Positive metacognitions about Internet use: The mediating role in the relationship between emotional dysregulation and problematic use.

    Silvia Casale;Scott E. Caplan;Giulia Fioravanti

  • Emotional eating in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa.

    Valdo Ricca;Giovanni Castellini;Giulia Fioravanti;Carolina Lo Sauro

  • Satisfying needs through Social Networking Sites: A pathway towards problematic Internet use for socially anxious people?

    Silvia Casale;Giulia Fioravanti

  • Psychometric evaluation of the Generalized Problematic Internet Use Scale 2 in an Italian sample.

    Giulia Fioravanti;Caterina Primi;Silvia Casale

  • The Effects of the Fear of Missing Out on People's Social Networking Sites Use During the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Mediating Role of Online Relational Closeness and Individuals' Online Communication Attitude

    Francesca Gioia;Giulia Fioravanti;Silvia Casale;Valentina Boursier

  • Factor structure and psychometric properties of the Italian version of the fear of missing out scale in emerging adults and adolescents.

    Silvia Casale;Giulia Fioravanti

  • Psychosocial correlates of internet use among Italian students

    Silvia Casale;Giulia Fioravanti

  • Grandiose and Vulnerable Narcissists: Who Is at Higher Risk for Social Networking Addiction?

    Silvia Casale;Giulia Fioravanti;Laura Rugai

  • Taking a Short Break from Instagram: The Effects on Subjective Well-Being.

    Giulia Fioravanti;Alfonso Prostamo;Silvia Casale

  • Examining the impact of daily exposure to body-positive and fitspiration Instagram content on young women’s mood and body image: An intensive longitudinal study:

    Giulia Fioravanti;Andrea Svicher;Giulia Ceragioli;Viola Bruni

  • Multiple exposure to appearance-focused real accounts on Instagram: Effects on body image among both genders

    Silvia Casale;Gabriele Gemelli;Chiara Calosi;Barbara Giangrasso

  • Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the Italian Internet Addiction Test.

    Giulia Fioravanti;Silvia Casale

  • The Association Between Psychological Well-Being and Problematic Use of Internet Communicative Services Among Young People

    Silvia Casale;Stefano Lecchi;Giulia Fioravanti

  • Social support and self-efficacy in patients with Myasthenia Gravis: a common pathway towards positive health outcomes.

    Alberto Raggi;Matilde Leonardi;Renato Mantegazza;Silvia Casale

  • Preference for online social interactions among young people: Direct and indirect effects of emotional intelligence

    Silvia Casale;Lisa Tella;Giulia Fioravanti

Frequent Co-Authors

Silvia Casale
Silvia Casale University of Florence
Carlo Faravelli
Carlo Faravelli University of Florence
Valdo Ricca
Valdo Ricca University of Florence
Gordon L. Flett
Gordon L. Flett York University
Edoardo Mannucci
Edoardo Mannucci University of Florence
Paul L. Hewitt
Paul L. Hewitt University of British Columbia
Marcantonio M. Spada
Marcantonio M. Spada London South Bank University
Matilde Leonardi
Matilde Leonardi Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta
Renato Mantegazza
Renato Mantegazza Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta
Stefano Pallanti
Stefano Pallanti Albert Einstein College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Psychology can often open doors to rewarding fields such as social work, counseling, and mental health services. Many students consider advancing their careers with online degrees that fit their lifestyle and allow them to specialize in areas like clinical work, community outreach, or youth services.

If you’re seeking standout programs, you might look at the best social work programs in Miami for strong clinical and multicultural training. In the central U.S., you’ll find a diverse array of top social work programs in the Midwest known for their flexible online options and respected faculty.

Students living in Minnesota can explore top social work degrees in Minnesota that blend practical experience with academic rigor. Meanwhile, those in the South may consider the top social work programs in Mississippi for strong community-focused curricula.

Choosing an online degree that aligns with your career goals and personal interests is crucial. Many programs also offer field placements and networking opportunities, making it easier to transition from online learning to real-world practice in psychology and social work.

Best Scientists Citing Giulia Fioravanti

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles