World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
27603
World Ranking
13188
National Ranking
703

Bruno Reichart publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno Reichart sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,070 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Bruno Reichart D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruno Reichart sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bruno Reichart is affiliated with Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München in Germany and focuses on research in medicine, particularly in surgery and related biomedical fields. Their scholarly output spans multiple disciplines, including biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and pathology. Reichart's work has a significant emphasis on xenotransplantation and immune response, reflecting a specialized interest in organ transplantation techniques and outcomes.

Their research also covers tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, virus-based gene therapy, animal genetics and reproduction, as well as cardiac ischemia and reperfusion. These topics illustrate a broad engagement with both fundamental and applied sciences in transplantation biology and related medical technologies.

Reichart has contributed extensively to scientific literature, particularly in journals aligned with transplantation and cardiovascular research. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Xenotransplantation
  • Transplantation
  • The Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon
  • Zeitschrift für Herz- Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie
  • The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation

Their recent papers demonstrate a focus on cardiac xenotransplantation and its clinical implications. Notable works include:

  • "Pig-to-non-human primate heart transplantation: The final step toward clinical xenotransplantation?" (2020), The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
  • "Cardiac xenotransplantation: from concept to clinic" (2022), Cardiovascular Research
  • "Impact of porcine cytomegalovirus on long-term orthotopic cardiac xenotransplant survival" (2020), Scientific Reports
  • "Growth hormone receptor knockout to reduce the size of donor pigs for preclinical xenotransplantation studies" (2020), Xenotransplantation
  • "Cold non-ischemic heart preservation with continuous perfusion prevents early graft failure in orthotopic pig-to-baboon xenotransplantation" (2020), Xenotransplantation

Collaboration has been a significant aspect of Reichart's research activities. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Eckhard Wolf
  • Matthias Längin
  • Jan-Michael Abicht
  • Paolo Brenner
  • Julia Radan

These collaborators appear repeatedly across publications, indicating ongoing teamwork in advancing the field of xenotransplantation and surgery.

Bruno Reichart's scientific contributions mainly involve experimental and clinical aspects of transplantation, with an emphasis on improving graft survival, transplant techniques, and understanding immunological challenges in xenotransplantation.

Best Publications

  • Long-term survival in patients with repair of tetralogy of Fallot: 36-year follow-up of 490 survivors of the first year after surgical repair.

    Georg Nollert;Teddy Fischlein;Stefan Bouterwek;Christine Böhmer

  • Shedding of the Endothelial Glycocalyx in Patients Undergoing Major Vascular Surgery With Global and Regional Ischemia

    Markus Rehm;Dirk Bruegger;Frank Christ;Peter Conzen

  • Simvastatin Reduces Graft Vessel Disease and Mortality After Heart Transplantation: A Four-Year Randomized Trial

    Klaus Wenke;Bruno Meiser;Joachim Thiery;Dorothea Nagel

  • Randomized Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Unprotected Left Main Stem Stenosis

    Enno Boudriot;Holger Thiele;Thomas Walther;Christoph Liebetrau

  • Continuous cardiac output by femoral arterial thermodilution calibrated pulse contour analysis: comparison with pulmonary arterial thermodilution.

    Oliver Goedje;Kerstin Hoeke;Michael Lichtwarck-Aschoff;A. Faltchauser

  • Consistent success in life-supporting porcine cardiac xenotransplantation

    Matthias Längin;Tanja Mayr;Bruno Reichart;Sebastian Michel

  • Hemodynamic and metabolic responses to hormonal therapy in brain-dead potential organ donors.

    D. Novitzky;D. K. C. Cooper;B. Reichart

  • Reliability of a new algorithm for continuous cardiac output determination by pulse-contour analysis during hemodynamic instability.

    Oliver Gödje;Kerstin Höke;Alwin E. Goetz;Thomas W. Felbinger

  • Photopheresis for the Prevention of Rejection in Cardiac Transplantation

    Mark L. Barr;Bruno M. Meiser;Howard J. Eisen;Randall F. Roberts

  • Effect of sympathetic reinnervation on cardiac performance after heart transplantation.

    Frank M. Bengel;Peter Ueberfuhr;Nina Schiepel;Stephan G. Nekolla

  • Use of the voice-controlled and computer-assisted surgical system ZEUS for endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting.

    Hermann Reichenspurner;Ralph J. Damiano;Michael Mack;Dieter H. Boehm

  • Serial Assessment of Sympathetic Reinnervation After Orthotopic Heart Transplantation A Longitudinal Study Using PET and C-11 Hydroxyephedrine

    Frank M. Bengel;Peter Ueberfuhr;Sibylle I. Ziegler;Stephan Nekolla

  • The failing human heart is unable to use the Frank-Starling mechanism.

    R. H. G. Schwinger;M. Böhm;A. Koch;U. Schmidt

  • Simvastatin Initiated Early After Heart Transplantation 8-Year Prospective Experience

    Klaus Wenke;Bruno Meiser;Joachim Thiery;Dorothea Nagel

  • Central venous pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and intrathoracic blood volumes as preload indicators in cardiac surgery patients.

    O Gödje;M Peyerl;T Seebauer;P Lamm

  • Mechanical circulatory support for advanced heart failure: effect of patient selection on outcome.

    Mario C. Deng;Matthias Loebe;Aly El-Banayosy;Edoardo Gronda

  • Prevention of myocardial injury during brain death by total cardiac sympathectomy in the Chacma baboon

    D. Novitzky;W.N. Wicomb;D. K.C. Cooper;A.G. Rose

  • CD14(++)CD16+ monocytes but not total monocyte numbers predict cardiovascular events in dialysis patients.

    G.H. Heine;C. Ulrich;E. Seibert;S. Seiler

  • Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of Serial Dobutamine Stress Echocardiography for Noninvasive Assessment of Cardiac Allograft Vasculopathy A Comparison With Coronary Angiography and Intravascular Ultrasound

    Christoph H. Spes;Volker Klauss;Harald Mudra;Susanne D. Schnaack

  • Health-related quality of life and post-traumatic stress disorder in patients after cardiac surgery and intensive care treatment.

    Christian Stoll;Gustav Schelling;Alwin E. Goetz;Erich Kilger

Frequent Co-Authors

Eckhard Wolf
Eckhard Wolf Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Gerhard Steinbeck
Gerhard Steinbeck Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
David Ayares
David Ayares University of Maryland, Baltimore
Joachim Denner
Joachim Denner Freie Universität Berlin
Frank M. Bengel
Frank M. Bengel Hannover Medical School
Markus Schwaiger
Markus Schwaiger Technical University of Munich
Konstantin Nikolaou
Konstantin Nikolaou University of Tübingen
Christoph R. Becker
Christoph R. Becker Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Erland Erdmann
Erland Erdmann University of Cologne
Stephan G. Nekolla
Stephan G. Nekolla Technical University of Munich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers in healthcare isn’t limited to becoming a physician. Many students discover rewarding roles through related online degree programs, which can offer flexibility and faster entry into the workforce. For those interested in advanced clinical positions, online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses provide accelerated options to become a registered nurse with a master’s degree, even for those with a non-nursing background.

If you’re searching for accessible pathways, check out the easiest nursing schools to get into, which often have flexible admission criteria. Additionally, some institutions do not require standardized tests for entry; to learn more, read do you have to take the teas test to get into nursing school.

For those interested in the administrative side of healthcare, online medical billing and coding with financial aid programs open doors to in-demand careers that support patient care behind the scenes. These alternative pathways offer valuable opportunities for anyone pursuing a future in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Bruno Reichart

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles