World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
51
Citations
13446
World Ranking
16983
National Ranking
7002

Mark E. Cook publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Cook sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 249 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Mark E. Cook D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark E. Cook sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark E. Cook is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on fields related to Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Veterinary studies, with specific emphasis on Animal Science and Zoology, Small Animals, Nutrition and Dietetics, Clinical Biochemistry, and Pharmacology.

The main research topics Mark E. Cook covers include:

  • Coccidia and coccidiosis research
  • Animal Nutrition and Physiology
  • Rabbits: Nutrition, Reproduction, Health
  • Fatty Acid Research and Health
  • Advanced Glycation End Products research
  • Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
  • Animal health and immunology

Their recent publications reflect this focus and cover issues related to animal health, nutritional supplementation, and poultry disease management. Notable papers include:

  • Dietary supplementation of sulfur amino acids improves intestinal immunity to Eimeria in broilers treated with anti-interleukin-10 antibody (2022), published in Animal Nutrition
  • Milton L Sunde, PhD: 1921-2015 (2020), published in Journal of Nutrition
  • Effects of dietary sulfur amino acid levels on growth performance and intestinal immunity in broilers vaccinated and subsequently infected with coccidiosis (2023), published in Poultry Science
  • PSVIII-2 Antibody yield for polyclonal egg yolk antibody (IgY) production in laying hens (2020), published in Journal of Animal Science
  • PSVIII-11 Eimeria management for recently transported Holstein heifers using essential oils, anti IL-10 or monensin (2020), published in Journal of Animal Science

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Mark E. Cook include Zhouzheng Ren, Rose Whelan, Daniel E. Bütz, Xiaojun Yang, and Thomas D. Crenshaw, each contributing to multiple joint publications.

The most common venues where their work appears are:

  • Journal of Animal Science
  • Animal Nutrition
  • Journal of Nutrition
  • Poultry Science

Best Publications

  • Effect of conjugated linoleic acid on body composition in mice

    Yeonhwa Park;Karen J. Albright;Wei Liu;Jayne M. Storkson

  • The Biologically Active Isomers of Conjugated Linoleic Acid

    Michael W. Pariza;Yeonhwa Park;Mark E. Cook

  • Immune Modulation by Altered Nutrient Metabolism: Nutritional Control of Immune-Induced Growth Depression

    M. E. Cook;C. C. Miller;Y. Park;M. Pariza

  • Mechanisms of Action of Conjugated Linoleic Acid: Evidence and Speculation

    Michael W. Pariza;Yeonhwa Park;Mark E. Cook

  • Feeding Conjugated Linoleic Acid to Animals Partially Overcomes Catabolic Responses Due to Endotoxin Injection

    C.C. Miller;Y. Park;M.W. Pariza;M.E. Cook

  • Changes in body composition in mice during feeding and withdrawal of conjugated linoleic acid

    Yeonhwa Park;Karen J. Albright;Jayne M. Storkson;Wei Liu

  • Conjugated linoleic acid: implications for human health.

    Leah D Whigham;Mark E Cook;Richard L Atkinson

  • Conjugated linoleic acid is a growth factor for rats as shown by enhanced weight gain and improved feed efficiency

    Sou F. Chin;Jayne M. Storkson;Karen J. Albright;Mark E. Cook

  • Increased adiposity in animals due to a human virus.

    NV Dhurandhar;BA Israel;JM Kolesar;GF Mayhew

  • Inhibition of hepatic stearoyl-CoA desaturase activity by trans-10, cis-12 conjugated linoleic acid and its derivatives.

    Yeonhwa Park;Jayne M. Storkson;James M. Ntambi;Mark E. Cook

  • Recognition of lyso-phospholipids by human natural killer T lymphocytes.

    Lisa M. Fox;Daryl G. Cox;Jennifer L. Lockridge;Xiaohua Wang

  • Enhanced Immune Responses in Broiler Chicks Fed Methionine-Supplemented Diets

    V. K. Tsiagbe;M. E. Cook;A. E. Harper;M. L. Sunde

  • Conjugated linoleic acid and the control of cancer and obesity.

    M W Pariza;Y Park;M E Cook

  • Dietary conjugated linoleic acid decreased cachexia, macrophage tumor necrosis factor-alpha production, and modifies splenocyte cytokines production.

    Mingder Yang;Mark E. Cook

  • Transmissibility of adenovirus-induced adiposity in a chicken model.

    NV Dhurandhar;BA Israel;JM Kolesar;G Mayhew

  • METODO PARA REDUCIR LA GRASA CORPORAL EN ANIMALES MEDIANTE LA ADMINISTRACION DE ACIDO LINOLEICO CONJUGADO.

    Cook Mark E;Pariza Michael W;Park Yeonhwa

  • Olive Oil Prevents the Adverse Effects of Dietary Conjugated Linoleic Acid on Chick Hatchability and Egg Quality

    Rahim Aydin;Michael W. Pariza;Mark E. Cook

  • CLA reduces antigen-induced histamine and PGE2release from sensitized guinea pig tracheae

    Leah D. Whigham;Ellen B. Cook;James L. Stahl;Ricardo Saban

  • Skeletal Deformities and Their Causes: Introduction

    M. E. Cook

  • Sturkie's Avian Physiology

    Mark E. Cook

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael W. Pariza
Michael W. Pariza University of Wisconsin–Madison
Yeonhwa Park
Yeonhwa Park University of Massachusetts Amherst
Martin Petkovich
Martin Petkovich Queen's University
Warren P. Porter
Warren P. Porter University of Wisconsin–Madison
James M. Ntambi
James M. Ntambi University of Wisconsin–Madison
Alan D. Attie
Alan D. Attie University of Wisconsin–Madison
Dale A. Schoeller
Dale A. Schoeller University of Wisconsin–Madison
Michael R. Hayden
Michael R. Hayden University of British Columbia
Thomas D. Crenshaw
Thomas D. Crenshaw University of Wisconsin–Madison
Charles J. Sih
Charles J. Sih University of Wisconsin–Madison

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering a future in Biology or Biochemistry, there are several related online degree options and career pathways to explore. Many students find that specialized programs can open doors to rewarding careers in healthcare, research, nutrition, and administration.

For those interested in nutrition and diet, pursuing an online dietitian degree is a great way to build foundational knowledge in nutritional science and prepare for licensure. If healthcare management is appealing, consider cahme accredited online mha programs, which are recognized for their industry relevance and can lead to leadership roles in medical organizations.

Some students aim for advanced careers by earning a doctor of nursing practice degree, which helps professionals move into specialized or executive positions in nursing. Others may choose to enhance their administrative potential through online doctoral programs healthcare administration, preparing them for top-tier management roles in a variety of healthcare settings.

Each of these online degree options supports flexible study and career advancement after a foundation in Biology or Biochemistry.

Best Scientists Citing Mark E. Cook

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles