World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
115
Citations
49448
World Ranking
4538
National Ranking
2464

Dale A. Schoeller publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dale A. Schoeller sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 471 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Dale A. Schoeller D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dale A. Schoeller sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 115 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dale A. Schoeller is affiliated with the University of Wisconsin-Madison in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with a significant concentration in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Physiology, Cell Biology, Nutrition and Dietetics, and Social Psychology.

The scientist's work covers a variety of main topics, including:

  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Diet and Metabolism Studies
  • Muscle Metabolism and Nutrition
  • Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Thermoregulation and Physiological Responses
  • Nutrition and Health in Aging

Schoeller has contributed to several well-known publication venues, which include:

  • Journal of Nutrition
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
  • Clinical Nutrition
  • International Journal of Sports Physiology and Performance
  • Science

Among the recent papers associated with Schoeller, the following stand out:

  • Daily energy expenditure through the human life course, 2021, Science
  • Traditional Self-Reported Dietary Instruments Are Prone to Inaccuracies and New Approaches Are Needed, 2020, Frontiers in Nutrition
  • Effect of Sleep Extension on Objectively Assessed Energy Intake Among Adults With Overweight in Real-life Settings, 2022, JAMA Internal Medicine
  • A standard calculation methodology for human doubly labeled water studies, 2021, Cell Reports Medicine
  • Energy compensation and adiposity in humans, 2021, Current Biology

The scientist frequently collaborates with colleagues in their field. Their most common co-authors include:

  • Ross L. Prentice
  • Herman Pontzer
  • Hiroyuki Sagayama
  • Amy Luke
  • John R. Speakman

Best Publications

  • How much physical activity is enough to prevent unhealthy weight gain? Outcome of the IASO 1st Stock Conference and consensus statement

    W. H. M. Saris;S. N. Blair;M. A. van Baak;S. B. Eaton

  • Using Intake Biomarkers to Evaluate the Extent of Dietary Misreporting in a Large Sample of Adults: The OPEN Study

    Amy F. Subar;Victor Kipnis;Richard P. Troiano;Douglas Midthune

  • Estimation of total body water by bioelectrical impedance analysis

    Robert F Kushner;Dale A Schoeller

  • Structure of Dietary Measurement Error: Results of the OPEN Biomarker Study

    Victor Kipnis;Amy F. Subar;Douglas Midthune;Laurence S. Freedman

  • Energy expenditure by doubly labeled water: validation in humans and proposed calculation

    D. A. Schoeller;E. Ravussin;Y. Schutz;K. J. Acheson

  • Sleep curtailment is accompanied by increased intake of calories from snacks.

    Arlet V Nedeltcheva;Jennifer M Kilkus;Jacqueline Imperial;Kristen Kasza

  • Validity of reported energy intake in obese and nonobese adolescents.

    L G Bandini;D A Schoeller;H N Cyr;W H Dietz

  • Total body water measurement in humans with 18O and 2H labeled water.

    D A Schoeller;E van Santen;D W Peterson;W Dietz

  • Energy balance and its components: implications for body weight regulation

    Kevin D. Hall;Steven B. Heymsfield;Joseph W. Kemnitz;Samuel Klein

  • Development of bioelectrical impedance analysis prediction equations for body composition with the use of a multicomponent model for use in epidemiologic surveys

    Shumei S Sun;W Cameron Chumlea;Steven B Heymsfield;Henry C Lukaski

  • Measurement of energy expenditure in humans by doubly labeled water method

    D. A. Schoeller;E. van Santen

  • Daily Activity Energy Expenditure and Mortality Among Older Adults

    Todd M. Manini;James E. Everhart;Kushang V. Patel;Dale A. Schoeller

  • Measurement of energy expenditure in free-living humans by using doubly labeled water.

    Dale A. Schoeller

  • How Accurate Is Self-Reported Dietary Energy Intake?

    Dale A. Schoeller

  • Evaluation of dietary assessment instruments against doubly labeled water, a biomarker of habitual energy intake.

    Jillian Trabulsi;Dale A. Schoeller

  • Energy balance measurement: when something is not better than nothing

    N V Dhurandhar;D Schoeller;A W Brown;S B Heymsfield

  • Limitations in the assessment of dietary energy intake by self-report

    Dale A. Schoeller

  • A comparison of a food frequency questionnaire with a 24-hour recall for use in an epidemiological cohort study: results from the biomarker-based Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study

    Arthur Schatzkin;Victor Kipnis;Raymond J Carroll;Douglas Midthune

  • Entrainment of the diurnal rhythm of plasma leptin to meal timing.

    D A Schoeller;L K Cella;M K Sinha;J F Caro

  • Is the impedance index (ht2/R) significant in predicting total body water?

    Robert F. Kushner;Dale A. Schoeller;Carla R. Fjeld;Lynn Danford

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert F. Kushner
Robert F. Kushner Northwestern University
Steven B. Heymsfield
Steven B. Heymsfield Pennington Biomedical Research Center
Terrence Forrester
Terrence Forrester University of the West Indies
Richard S. Cooper
Richard S. Cooper Loyola University Chicago
Tamara B. Harris
Tamara B. Harris National Institutes of Health
William H. Dietz
William H. Dietz George Washington University
Richard Weindruch
Richard Weindruch University of Wisconsin–Madison
Pascal Bovet
Pascal Bovet University Center for General Medicine and Public Health (Unisanté)
Amy F. Subar
Amy F. Subar National Cancer Institute
Estelle V. Lambert
Estelle V. Lambert University of Cape Town

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in medicine often starts with understanding a variety of entry points and flexible study options. For students and working professionals, online degrees open up opportunities to get ahead without putting life on hold. Many begin with adn programs, which offer a faster pathway into nursing for those wanting to enter the workforce quickly.

For registered nurses aiming to advance, the cheapest bsn programs allow RNs to earn Bachelor of Science in Nursing degrees online, increasing earning potential and career options. Non-nursing graduates interested in advanced practice roles can consider direct entry nurse practitioner programs for non-nurses online, which offer master’s level preparation for future nurse practitioners.

If your goals include research and leadership positions, phd nursing programs online provide rigorous training in evidence-based practice, healthcare policy, and teaching. Each of these pathways helps build a rewarding medical career tailored to your background and aspirations.

Best Scientists Citing Dale A. Schoeller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles