World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
46
Citations
10275
World Ranking
2797
National Ranking
1342

Frédéric Chédin publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frédéric Chédin sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 83 publications — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Frédéric Chédin D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frédéric Chédin sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frédéric Chédin is affiliated with the University of California, Davis, in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a strong emphasis on Molecular Biology as a subfield. Additional subfields include Genetics, Plant Science, Epidemiology, and Immunology.

Their scientific work addresses several key topics within molecular biology and genetics, with concentration on:

  • DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • DNA and Nucleic Acid Chemistry
  • CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation

Chédin has published extensively in various scientific venues. The most frequent publication platforms include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • eLife
  • Nucleic Acids Research
  • The Journal of Cell Biology

Recent representative publications by Frédéric Chédin include:

  • "Topoisomerase 1 prevents replication stress at R-loop-enriched transcription termination sites," 2020, Nature Communications
  • "Recognition of RNA by the S9.6 antibody creates pervasive artifacts when imaging RNA:DNA hybrids," 2021, The Journal of Cell Biology
  • "Defining R-loop classes and their contributions to genome instability," 2021, DNA Repair
  • "Emerging roles for R-loop structures in the management of topological stress," 2020, Journal of Biological Chemistry
  • "CARM1 Inhibition Enables Immunotherapy of Resistant Tumors by Dual Action on Tumor Cells and T Cells," 2021, Cancer Discovery

Collaboration is a notable feature of their career, with frequent coauthors including:

  • Stella R. Hartono
  • Lionel A. Sanz
  • Daisy Castillo-Guzman
  • Shanaya Shital Shah
  • Wolf-Dietrich Heyer

Best Publications

  • R-loop formation is a distinctive characteristic of unmethylated human CpG island promoters

    Paul A. Ginno;Paul L. Lott;Holly C. Christensen;Ian F Korf

  • R-loops at immunoglobulin class switch regions in the chromosomes of stimulated B cells

    Kefei Yu;Frederic Chedin;Chih Lin Hsieh;Thomas E. Wilson

  • The DNA methyltransferase-like protein DNMT3L stimulates de novo methylation by Dnmt3a

    Frédéric Chédin;Michael R. Lieber;Chih-Lin Hsieh

  • Comprehensive proteomic analysis of mesenchymal stem cell exosomes reveals modulation of angiogenesis via nuclear factor-kappaB signaling

    Johnathon D. Anderson;Henrik J. Johansson;Calvin S. Graham;Mattias Vesterlund

  • Prevalent, Dynamic, and Conserved R-Loop Structures Associate with Specific Epigenomic Signatures in Mammals

    Lionel A. Sanz;Stella R. Hartono;Yoong Wearn Lim;Sandra Steyaert

  • GC skew at the 5′ and 3′ ends of human genes links R-loop formation to epigenetic regulation and transcription termination

    Paul A Ginno;Yoong Wearn Lim;Paul L Lott;Ian F Korf

  • Co-transcriptional R-loops are the main cause of estrogen-induced DNA damage

    Caroline Townsend Stork;Michael Bocek;Madzia P Crossley;Julie Sollier

  • Physical and functional interactions between the human DNMT3L protein and members of the de novo methyltransferase family

    Zhao Xia Chen;Jeffrey R. Mann;Chih Lin Hsieh;Arthur D. Riggs

  • Arginine methylation facilitates the recruitment of TOP3B to chromatin to prevent R-loop accumulation

    Yanzhong Yang;Kevin M. McBride;Sean Hensley;Yue Lu

  • Reconstitution and mechanism of the stimulation of de novo methylation by human DNMT3L.

    Michael S. Kareta;Zaida M. Botello;Joshua J. Ennis;Christina Chou

  • Recognition of Multivalent Histone States Associated with Heterochromatin by UHRF1 Protein

    Nataliya Nady;Alexander Lemak;John R. Walker;George V. Avvakumov

  • The DNMT3 family of mammalian de novo DNA methyltransferases.

    Frédéric Chédin

  • Transcription-associated R-loop formation across the human FMR1 CGG-repeat region.

    Erick W. Loomis;Lionel A. Sanz;Frédéric Chédin;Paul J. Hagerman

  • Nascent Connections: R-Loops and Chromatin Patterning

    Frédéric Chédin

  • High-resolution, strand-specific R-loop mapping via S9.6-based DNA–RNA immunoprecipitation and high-throughput sequencing

    Lionel A. Sanz;Frédéric Chédin

  • Genome-wide DNA hypomethylation and RNA:DNA hybrid accumulation in Aicardi-Goutières syndrome

    Yoong Wearn Lim;Lionel A Sanz;Xiaoqin Xu;Stella R Hartono

  • R-loop formation at Snord116 mediates topotecan inhibition of Ube3a-antisense and allele-specific chromatin decondensation

    Weston T. Powell;Rochelle L. Coulson;Michael L. Gonzales;Florence K. Crary

  • DNMT3L modulates significant and distinct flanking sequence preference for DNA methylation by DNMT3A and DNMT3B in vivo.

    Bethany L. Wienholz;Michael S. Kareta;Amir H. Moarefi;Catherine A. Gordon

  • Attenuation of RNA polymerase II pausing mitigates BRCA1-associated R-loop accumulation and tumorigenesis.

    Xiaowen Zhang;Huai Chin Chiang;Yao Wang;Chi Zhang

  • The Affinity of the S9.6 Antibody for Double-Stranded RNAs Impacts the Accurate Mapping of R-Loops in Fission Yeast.

    Stella R. Hartono;Amélie Malapert;Pénélope Legros;Pascal Bernard

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen C. Kowalczykowski
Stephen C. Kowalczykowski University of California, Davis
Wolf Dietrich Heyer
Wolf Dietrich Heyer University of California, Davis
S. Dusko Ehrlich
S. Dusko Ehrlich University College London
Karlene A. Cimprich
Karlene A. Cimprich Stanford University
Sirano Dhe-Paganon
Sirano Dhe-Paganon Harvard University
Cheryl H. Arrowsmith
Cheryl H. Arrowsmith Structural Genomics Consortium
Chih-Lin Hsieh
Chih-Lin Hsieh University of Southern California
Ian F Korf
Ian F Korf University of California, Davis
Bin Tian
Bin Tian The Wistar Institute
Victor X. Jin
Victor X. Jin Medical College of Wisconsin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring molecular biology in the USA can open the door to a variety of related online degree and career pathways. Many students leverage their foundational knowledge in molecular biology to pursue further studies or pivot to allied fields.

For graduates interested in communication sciences or speech therapy, pursuing an SLP bridge pathway for communication sciences graduates is a popular option. This allows those with a science background to move into high-demand speech-language pathology roles.

Healthcare remains a lucrative career destination, and many learners consider completing online bsn programs for non nurses to become Registered Nurses quickly. These programs often build upon existing science coursework, making them accessible for molecular biology graduates.

With a BSN, further career advancement is possible, such as becoming a nurse practitioner. You may want to know psychiatric nurse practitioner salary trends or explore how long to become nurse practitioner if you’re eager to plan your educational journey.

Best Scientists Citing Frédéric Chédin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles