World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Best Female Scientists

D-Index
119
Citations
51497
World Ranking
590
National Ranking
355

Medicine

D-Index
121
Citations
54326
World Ranking
3606
National Ranking
1991

Amy F. Subar publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy F. Subar sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 263 publications — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Amy F. Subar D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Amy F. Subar sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 121 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award

Overview

Amy F. Subar is affiliated with the National Cancer Institute in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with an emphasis on public health, environmental and occupational health, physiology, nutrition and dietetics, ecology, and artificial intelligence. The breadth of their work includes various subfields, reflecting an interdisciplinary approach to health sciences.

The scientist's work revolves around key topics such as nutritional studies and diet, obesity, physical activity and diet, consumer attitudes and food labeling, nutrition, health and food behavior, agriculture sustainability and environmental impact, adipose tissue and metabolism, and solar radiation and photovoltaics.

Frequent collaborators in their research include Kevin W. Dodd, Sharon I. Kirkpatrick, Dale A. Schoeller, Heather R. Bowles, and Yikyung Park. These repeated coauthorships highlight ongoing partnerships in advancing understanding in related areas.

Publication venues where Amy F. Subar has contributed multiple works are:

  • Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
  • UNC Libraries
  • American Journal of Epidemiology
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • iScience

Recent papers authored by Amy F. Subar or including their contribution cover various aspects of dietary assessment tools, statistical techniques related to dietary intake data, and comparisons of dietary intake assessments. Notable publications include:

  • "Performance and Feasibility of Recalls Completed Using the Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Assessment Tool in Relation to Other Self-Report Tools and Biomarkers in the Interactive Diet and Activity Tracking in AARP (IDATA) Study," 2020, Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
  • "Using Short-Term Dietary Intake Data to Address Research Questions Related to Usual Dietary Intake among Populations and Subpopulations: Assumptions, Statistical Techniques, and Considerations," 2022, Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
  • "Measurement Error Affecting Web- and Paper-Based Dietary Assessment Instruments: Insights From the Multi-Cohort Eating and Activity Study for Understanding Reporting Error," 2022, American Journal of Epidemiology
  • "Healthy Eating Index-2015 Scores Among Adults Based on Observed vs Recalled Dietary Intake," 2021, Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
  • "Human total, basal and activity energy expenditures are independent of ambient environmental temperature," 2022, iScience

Best Publications

  • Fruit, vegetables, and cancer prevention: A review of the epidemiological evidence

    Gladys Block;Blossom Patterson;Amy Subar

  • Comparative Validation of the Block, Willett, and National Cancer Institute Food Frequency Questionnaires The Eating at America's Table Study

    Amy F. Subar;Frances E. Thompson;Victor Kipnis;Douglas Midthune

  • Update of the Healthy Eating Index: HEI-2015

    Susan M. Krebs-Smith;TusaRebecca E. Pannucci;Amy F. Subar;Sharon I. Kirkpatrick

  • Using Intake Biomarkers to Evaluate the Extent of Dietary Misreporting in a Large Sample of Adults: The OPEN Study

    Amy F. Subar;Victor Kipnis;Richard P. Troiano;Douglas Midthune

  • Dietary Assessment Methodology

    Frances E. Thompson;Amy F. Subar

  • Addressing Current Criticism Regarding the Value of Self-Report Dietary Data

    Amy F Subar;Laurence S Freedman;Janet A Tooze;Sharon I Kirkpatrick

  • Structure of Dietary Measurement Error: Results of the OPEN Biomarker Study

    Victor Kipnis;Amy F. Subar;Douglas Midthune;Laurence S. Freedman

  • The Automated Self-Administered 24-Hour Dietary Recall (ASA24): A Resource for Researchers, Clinicians, and Educators from the National Cancer Institute

    Amy F. Subar;Sharon I. Kirkpatrick;Beth Mittl;Thea Palmer Zimmerman

  • Americans Do Not Meet Federal Dietary Recommendations

    Susan M. Krebs-Smith;Patricia M. Guenther;Amy F. Subar;Sharon I. Kirkpatrick

  • Design and Serendipity in Establishing a Large Cohort with Wide Dietary Intake Distributions The National Institutes of Health–American Association of Retired Persons Diet and Health Study

    Arthur Schatzkin;Amy F. Subar;Frances E. Thompson;Linda C. Harlan

  • Higher Diet Quality Is Associated with Decreased Risk of All-Cause, Cardiovascular Disease, and Cancer Mortality among Older Adults

    Jill Reedy;Susan M. Krebs-Smith;Paige E. Miller;Angela D. Liese

  • Mediterranean dietary pattern and prediction of all-cause mortality in a US population: results from the NIH-AARP Diet and Health Study.

    Panagiota N. Mitrou;Victor Kipnis;Anne C. M. Thiébaut;Jill Reedy

  • Evaluation of the Healthy Eating Index-2015

    Jill Reedy;Jennifer L. Lerman;Susan M. Krebs-Smith;Sharon I. Kirkpatrick

  • A comparison of a food frequency questionnaire with a 24-hour recall for use in an epidemiological cohort study: results from the biomarker-based Observing Protein and Energy Nutrition (OPEN) study

    Arthur Schatzkin;Victor Kipnis;Raymond J Carroll;Douglas Midthune

  • A mixed-effects model approach for estimating the distribution of usual intake of nutrients: The NCI method

    Janet A. Tooze;Victor Kipnis;Dennis W. Buckman;Raymond J. Carroll

  • Pooled Results From 5 Validation Studies of Dietary Self-Report Instruments Using Recovery Biomarkers for Energy and Protein Intake

    Laurence Freedman;John Commins;James Moler;Lenore Arab

  • A Prospective Study of Tobacco, Alcohol, and the Risk of Esophageal and Gastric Cancer Subtypes

    Neal D. Freedman;Christian C. Abnet;Michael F. Leitzmann;Traci Mouw

  • Fruit and Vegetable Intakes of Children and Adolescents in the United States

    Susan M. Krebs-Smith;D. Annetta Cook;Amy F. Subar;Linda Cleveland

  • Dietary fibre and colorectal adenoma in a colorectal cancer early detection programme

    Ulrike Peters;Rashmi Sinha;Nilanjan Chatterjee;Amy F Subar

  • Need for technological innovation in dietary assessment.

    Frances E. Thompson;Amy F. Subar;Catherine M. Loria;Jill L. Reedy

Frequent Co-Authors

Yikyung Park
Yikyung Park Washington University in St. Louis
Tom Baranowski
Tom Baranowski Baylor College of Medicine
Michael F. Leitzmann
Michael F. Leitzmann University of Regensburg
Raymond J. Carroll
Raymond J. Carroll Texas A&M University
Rachael Z. Stolzenberg-Solomon
Rachael Z. Stolzenberg-Solomon National Institutes of Health
Neil E. Caporaso
Neil E. Caporaso National Institutes of Health
Dale A. Schoeller
Dale A. Schoeller University of Wisconsin–Madison
Rashmi Sinha
Rashmi Sinha National Institutes of Health
Barry I. Graubard
Barry I. Graubard National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens diverse opportunities in the healthcare field, with flexible options for those who require online study. Many pursue affordable nursing programs online to launch or advance their careers, combining quality education with cost savings.

For registered nurses aiming to further their credentials, rn to bsn online programs offer a streamlined path to earn a bachelor's degree with flexible scheduling. Those interested in advanced research or academic roles can consider phd nursing programs, which prepare graduates for leadership and teaching positions in healthcare.

If you have a non-nursing background but want to switch to a healthcare career, direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors provide a fast-track route to become a Master’s-prepared nurse. These varied online pathways support different career goals while offering convenience for busy students.

Best Scientists Citing Amy F. Subar

Trending Scientists