World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Hartley Dean publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hartley Dean sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Hartley Dean D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hartley Dean sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hartley Dean is affiliated with the London School of Economics and Political Science in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily falls within the domain of Social Sciences, encompassing seven publications in this broad field. Within Social Sciences, Dean's work focuses notably on Sociology and Political Science, evidenced by four publications, alongside contributions to General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Political Science and International Relations, and Philosophy.

Their research topics cover a spectrum of issues related to social welfare, policy, and development. Key thematic areas include Employment and Welfare Studies and Social Policy and Reform Studies, each with four publications. Additional focal topics are Child Therapy and Development, Mental Health and Psychiatry, Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics, as well as intersections between Religion, Society, and Development.

Dean has contributed several research articles published in various academic journals and encyclopedias. Notable recent papers include:

  • A Radical Humanist Approach to Social Welfare (2020) in Ethics and Social Welfare
  • From altruism to sociality: A switch in perception (2022) in International Journal of Social Welfare
  • Marginalization, Outsiders (2023) in The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology
  • Basic Income: A History (2021) in Journal of Human Development and Capabilities
  • Universal Basic Income in Historical Perspective (2023) in Contributions to Political Economy

Their publication record also shows frequent appearances in the following venues:

  • The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology
  • Ethics and Social Welfare
  • International Journal of Social Welfare
  • Journal of Human Development and Capabilities
  • Contributions to Political Economy

Dean has authored books published by Policy Press, with two editions of "Understanding Human Need" released in 2020. These books have attracted citations and contribute to the scholar's profile in social policy literature.

There are no frequent co-authors reported, which may indicate largely independent research activities or diverse collaboration patterns.

Best Publications

  • Critiquing capabilities: the distractions of a beguiling concept

    Hartley Dean

  • Understanding Human Need

    Hartley Dean

  • Dependency culture: The explosion of a myth

    Hartley Dean;Peter Taylor-Gooby

  • Welfare Rights and Social Policy

    Hartley Dean

  • The ethics of welfare-to-work

    Hartley Dean

  • Social Rights and Human Welfare

    Hartley Dean

  • Poverty, Riches and Social Citizenship

    Hartley Dean;Margaret Melrose

  • Social Policy and Human Rights: Re-thinking the Engagement

    Hartley Dean

  • Begging questions : street level economic activity and social policy failure

    Hartley Dean

  • Muslim Perspectives on Welfare

    Hartley Dean;Zafar Khan

  • Social security and social control

    Hartley Dean

  • The Third Way and Social Welfare: The Myth of Post-emotionalism

    Hartley Dean

  • Welfare, law, and citizenship

    Hartley Dean

  • The ethics of welfare: human rights, dependency and responsibility

    Hartley Dean

  • Unravelling citizenship The significance of social security benefit fraud

    Hartley Dean;Margaret Melrose

  • Popular discourse and the ethical deficiency of 'Third Way' conceptions of citizenship

    Hartley Dean

  • The translation of needs into rights: Reconceptualising social citizenship as a global phenomenon

    Hartley Dean

  • Manageable discord: fraud and resistance in the social security system

    Hartley Dean;Margaret Melrose

  • Underclassed or undermined? : Young people and social citizenship

    Hartley Dean

  • Social advantage and disadvantage

    Hartley Dean;Lucinda Platt

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Taylor-Gooby
Peter Taylor-Gooby University of Kent
Armando Barrientos
Armando Barrientos University of Manchester

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities. Many students choose to complement their knowledge by pursuing an online interdisciplinary studies degree. This flexible path allows you to blend political science with subjects like sociology, communication, or psychology—broadening your skill set and job prospects.

For those interested in historical context, a master's in american history online can offer specialized insights. This qualification is especially valuable for careers in education, public policy, or research.

If you’re seeking to quickly boost your credentials, consider accelerated programs like the fastest masters degree options. These enable you to gain advanced expertise in less time, helping you enter the workforce sooner.

Additionally, completing online certificate programs that pay well can provide focused skills for high-demand roles in government, public administration, and beyond. These short-term credentials can enhance your resume and open the door to lucrative job opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Hartley Dean

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles