World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Riccardo Fusaroli

Riccardo Fusaroli

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
33
Citations
4516
World Ranking
10562
National Ranking
30

Riccardo Fusaroli publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Riccardo Fusaroli sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 126 publications — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Riccardo Fusaroli D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Riccardo Fusaroli sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Riccardo Fusaroli is affiliated with Aarhus University in Denmark. Their research primarily spans the field of Psychology, with significant contributions in Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, and Physiology.

The main topics explored in their work include:

  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Voice and Speech Disorders
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • Language, Metaphor, and Cognition

Fusaroli has published extensively in several key academic venues. Their frequent publication venues include:

  • Cognitive Science
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Schizophrenia Bulletin
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research

Some of their recent published papers are:

  • A systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of the acoustic features of infant-directed speech, 2022, Nature Human Behaviour
  • The evolution of early symbolic behavior in Homo sapiens, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Beyond Single-Mindedness: A Figure-Ground Reversal for the Cognitive Sciences, 2023, Cognitive Science
  • A systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of the development of turn taking in adult-child vocal interactions, 2022, Child Development
  • Quantifying the interplay of conversational devices in building mutual understanding, 2022, Journal of Experimental Psychology General

Frequent collaborators in Fusaroli's research are:

  • Arndis Simonsen
  • Kristian Tylén
  • Ethan Weed
  • Alberto Parola
  • Vibeke Bliksted

Best Publications

  • Dialog as interpersonal synergy

    Riccardo Fusaroli;Joanna Rączaszek-Leonardi;Kristian Tylén

  • Coming to Terms Quantifying the Benefits of Linguistic Coordination

    Riccardo Fusaroli;Bahador Bahrami;Bahador Bahrami;Bahador Bahrami;Karsten Olsen;Andreas Roepstorff

  • The self organization of human interaction

    Rick Dale;Riccardo Fusaroli;Riccardo Fusaroli;Nicholas D. Duran;Nicholas D. Duran;Daniel C. Richardson

  • Investigating Conversational Dynamics: Interactive Alignment, Interpersonal Synergy, and Collective Task Performance.

    Riccardo Fusaroli;Kristian Tylén

  • “Is voice a marker for Autism spectrum disorder? A systematic review and meta-analysis”

    Riccardo Fusaroli;Anna Lambrechts;Dan Bang;Dermot M. Bowler

  • Detecting affiliation in colaughter across 24 societies

    Gregory A. Bryant;Daniel M. T. Fessler;Riccardo Fusaroli;Edward Clint

  • Analyzing Social Interactions: The Promises and Challenges of Using Cross Recurrence Quantification Analysis

    Riccardo Fusaroli;Ivana Konvalinka;Sebastian Wallot

  • Voice patterns in schizophrenia: A systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis.

    Alberto Parola;Arndis Simonsen;Vibeke Bliksted;Riccardo Fusaroli

  • Environmental constraints shaping constituent order in emerging communication systems: Structural iconicity, interactive alignment and conventionalization.

    Peer Christensen;Peer Christensen;Riccardo Fusaroli;Kristian Tylén

  • Carving language for social coordination: A dynamical approach

    Riccardo Fusaroli;Kristian Tylén

  • Does interaction matter? Testing whether a confidence heuristic can replace interaction in collective decision-making

    Dan Bang;Dan Bang;Riccardo Fusaroli;Kristian Tylén;Karsten Olsen

  • Hearing me hearing you: Reciprocal effects between child and parent language in autism and typical development

    Riccardo Fusaroli;Ethan Weed;Deborah Fein;Letitia Naigles

  • Causal inference from noisy time-series data — Testing the Convergent Cross-Mapping algorithm in the presence of noise and external influence

    Dan Mønster;Riccardo Fusaroli;Kristian Tylén;Andreas Roepstorff

  • The dialogically extended mind: Language as skilful intersubjective engagement

    Riccardo Fusaroli;Nivedita Gangopadhyay;Kristian Tylén

  • A systematic review and Bayesian meta-analysis of the acoustic features of infant-directed speech

    Unknown

  • Beyond Single-Mindedness: A Figure-Ground Reversal for the Cognitive Sciences

    Unknown

  • The emergence of systematicity: How environmental and communicative factors shape a novel communication system.

    Jonas Nölle;Jonas Nölle;Marlene Staib;Riccardo Fusaroli;Kristian Tylén

  • The evolution of early symbolic behavior in Homo sapiens

    Kristian Tylén;Riccardo Fusaroli;Sergio Rojo;Katrin Heimann

  • ALIGN: Analyzing linguistic interactions with generalizable techNiques-A Python library.

    Nicholas D Duran;Alexandra Paxton;Riccardo Fusaroli

  • A heart for interaction: Shared physiological dynamics and behavioral coordination in a collective, creative construction task

    Riccardo Fusaroli;Johanne Stege Bjørndahl;Andreas Roepstorff;Kristian Tylén

  • The Perception of Spontaneous and Volitional Laughter Across 21 Societies

    Gregory A Bryant;Daniel M T Fessler;Riccardo Fusaroli;Edward Clint

  • Conversing with a devil's advocate: Interpersonal coordination in deception and disagreement.

    Nicholas D. Duran;Riccardo Fusaroli

  • Making sense together: a dynamical account of linguistic meaning making

    Kristian Tylén;Riccardo Fusaroli;Peer F. Bundgaard;Svend Østergaard

Frequent Co-Authors

Andreas Roepstorff
Andreas Roepstorff Aarhus University
Morten H. Christiansen
Morten H. Christiansen Cornell University
Ole Mors
Ole Mors Aarhus University
Bahador Bahrami
Bahador Bahrami Max Planck Society
Stefan Stieger
Stefan Stieger Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences
Rick Dale
Rick Dale University of California, Los Angeles
Chris D. Frith
Chris D. Frith University College London
Geraint Rees
Geraint Rees University College London
Gregory A. Bryant
Gregory A. Bryant University of California, Los Angeles
Norman P. Li
Norman P. Li Singapore Management University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees can open doors to a wide variety of rewarding careers in mental health. One popular path is marriage and family therapy (MFT), where professionals support individuals and families in navigating relationship challenges.

Becoming an MFT requires specific educational and certification steps, which can vary by location. For instance, those interested in practicing in Texas should review the Dallas mft certification requirements. In Colorado, you can learn more about how to become a marriage and family therapist in Denver.

Similar processes exist in other major cities. For example, the Detroit mft certification requirements outline the local steps, while those planning to work in North Carolina should be aware of Durham mft education requirements.

Whether you choose to specialize in family therapy or another field, understanding the certification and educational paths in your desired location is crucial. Studying psychology online can provide the flexibility and foundational knowledge needed to pursue these meaningful careers.

Best Scientists Citing Riccardo Fusaroli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles