World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 50 5513 5122 3002 2723 181 7448

J. C. Barnes publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by J. C. Barnes between 2007 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. J. C. Barnes published across 19 years, from 2007 to 2025, averaging 10.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2013. 10 of the 205 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2013. 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 26 publications 2014: 23 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 16 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 12 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 8 publications
2007 2025

205 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
J. C. Barnes: publications per year, 2007 to 2025
Year Publications
2007 3
2008 4
2009 7
2010 6
2011 14
2012 21
2013 26
2014 23
2015 15
2016 16
2017 12
2018 8
2019 12
2020 10
2021 7
2022 5
2023 6
2024 2
2025 8
Total 205
Download as CSV

J. C. Barnes publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. C. Barnes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 181–190 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 181 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397 181
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

J. C. Barnes D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. C. Barnes sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 50–51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445 50
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

J. C. Barnes is affiliated with the University of Cincinnati in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of social sciences. Their research primarily focuses on areas intersecting sociology, political science, clinical psychology, and genetics, with particular attention to crime patterns, criminal justice, genetic associations, and developmental health.

The scientist's work is represented across multiple publication venues, with frequent contributions in:

  • Journal of Experimental Criminology
  • Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Report
  • Molecular Psychiatry

J. C. Barnes has authored papers investigating complex intersections of biopsychological factors and socio-environmental influences in criminological outcomes. Notable recent publications include:

  • Uncovering the genetic architecture of broad antisocial behavior through a genome-wide association study meta-analysis, 2022, Molecular Psychiatry
  • The interaction of biopsychological and socio-environmental influences on criminological outcomes, 2020, Justice Quarterly
  • Identifying psychological pathways to polyvictimization: evidence from a longitudinal cohort study of twins from the UK, 2020, Journal of Experimental Criminology
  • Genetic associations with parental investment from conception to wealth inheritance in six cohorts, 2023, Nature Human Behaviour
  • Life-Course Persistent Antisocial Behavior and Accelerated Biological Aging in a Longitudinal Birth Cohort, 2022, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

The research topics covered by Barnes include:

  • Crime Patterns and Interventions
  • Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Birth, Development, and Health
  • Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Health disparities and outcomes

Frequent collaborators of J. C. Barnes reflect a strong network within criminology and related fields, including:

  • Peter T. Tanksley
  • Hexuan Liu
  • Richie Poulton
  • Terrie E. Moffitt
  • Kathleen Mullan Harris

Their contributions engage multiple subfields such as sociology and political science, clinical psychology, genetics, pediatrics, perinatology, and civil and structural engineering. The synthesis of these disciplines within their work indicates a multi-dimensional approach to understanding criminal behavior, genetic influences, and developmental pathways.

Best Publications

  • Self-control and health outcomes in a nationally representative sample.

    Holly Ventura Miller;J C Barnes;Kevin M Beaver

  • Genetic and Environmental Influences on Levels of Self-Control and Delinquent Peer Affiliation: Results from a Longitudinal Sample of Adolescent Twins

    Kevin M. Beaver;J. Eagle Schutt;Brian B. Boutwell;Marie Ratchford

  • Violence in criminal careers: A review of the literature from a developmental life-course perspective

    Alex R. Piquero;Wesley G. Jennings;J.C. Barnes

  • Monoamine oxidase A genotype is associated with gang membership and weapon use.

    Kevin M. Beaver;Matt DeLisi;Michael G. Vaughn;J.C. Barnes

  • The effect of medical marijuana laws on crime: evidence from state panel data, 1990-2006.

    Robert G. Morris;Michael Teneyck;J. C. Barnes;Tomislav Victor Kovandzic

  • DEMONSTRATING THE VALIDITY OF TWIN RESEARCH IN CRIMINOLOGY

    J. C. Barnes;John Paul Wright;John Paul Wright;Brian B. Boutwell;Joseph A. Schwartz

  • Sleep Deprivation, Low Self-Control, and Delinquency: A Test of the Strength Model of Self-Control

    Ryan C. Meldrum;J. C. Barnes;Carter Hay

  • Prior problem behavior accounts for the racial gap in school suspensions

    John Paul Wright;Mark Alden Morgan;Michelle A. Coyne;Kevin M. Beaver

  • EXAMINING THE GENETIC UNDERPINNINGS TO MOFFITT'S DEVELOPMENTAL TAXONOMY: A BEHAVIORAL GENETIC ANALYSIS*

    J.C. Barnes;Kevin M. Beaver;Brian B. Boutwell

  • Unpacking the Black Box of Peer Similarity in Deviance: Understanding the Mechanisms Linking Personal Behavior, Peer Behavior, and Perceptions

    Jacob T. N. Young;Cesar J. Rebellon;J. C. Barnes;Frank M. Weerman

  • On the consequences of ignoring genetic influences in criminological research

    J.C. Barnes;Brian B. Boutwell;Kevin M. Beaver;Kevin M. Beaver;Chris L. Gibson

  • Delinquent Gangs and Adolescent Victimization Revisited: A Propensity Score Matching Approach

    Matt DeLisi;J.C. Barnes;Kevin M. Beaver;Chris L. Gibson

  • Reducing racial inequalities in adulthood arrest by reducing inequalities in school discipline: Evidence from the school-to-prison pipeline.

    J. C. Barnes;Ryan T. Motz

  • Analyzing the Impact of a Statewide Residence Restriction Law on South Carolina Sex Offenders

    J.C. Barnes;Tony Dukes;Richard Tewksbury;Timothy M. De Troye

  • A demonstration of the generalizability of twin-based research on antisocial behavior.

    J. C. Barnes;Brian B. Boutwell

  • ASSESSING AND EXPLAINING MISPERCEPTIONS OF PEER DELINQUENCY

    Jacob T. N. Young;J. C. Barnes;Ryan C. Meldrum;Frank M. Weerman

  • The Association Between Parental Incarceration and Health, Education, and Economic Outcomes in Young Adulthood

    Holly Ventura Miller;J. C. Barnes

  • An empirical examination of adolescence-limited offending: A direct test of Moffitt's maturity gap thesis

    James Barnes;Kevin M. Beaver

  • Estimating the effect of gang membership on nonviolent and violent delinquency: a counterfactual analysis.

    J.C. Barnes;Kevin M. Beaver;J. Mitchell Miller

  • Genetic confounding of the relationship between father absence and age at menarche

    Nicole Barbaro;Brian B. Boutwell;J.C. Barnes;Todd K. Shackelford

  • County-level IQ and fertility rates: A partial test of Differential-K theory

    Brian B. Boutwell;Travis W. Franklin;J.C. Barnes;Kevin M. Beaver;Kevin M. Beaver

Frequent Co-Authors

Kevin M. Beaver
Kevin M. Beaver Florida State University
John Paul Wright
John Paul Wright University of Cincinnati
Michael G. Vaughn
Michael G. Vaughn Saint Louis University
Matt DeLisi
Matt DeLisi Iowa State University
Francis T. Cullen
Francis T. Cullen University of Cincinnati
Chris L. Gibson
Chris L. Gibson University of Florida
Gary D. Kleck
Gary D. Kleck Florida State University
Terrie E. Moffitt
Terrie E. Moffitt Duke University
Frank M. Weerman
Frank M. Weerman Erasmus University Rotterdam
Avshalom Caspi
Avshalom Caspi Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in psychology opens the door to diverse and rewarding roles, such as substance abuse counseling. This field is growing in demand, especially as communities prioritize mental health support and addiction recovery.

Many students begin with an online psychology degree, which provides a flexible route to foundational knowledge and essential skills. Specialization often requires meeting state-specific credentials. For example, Omaha substance abuse counselor certification requirements focus on accredited degrees and supervised clinical experience. Similarly, becoming a substance abuse counselor in Orlando means fulfilling licensure prerequisites unique to Florida.

Aspiring professionals in other cities should research becoming a substance abuse counselor in Philadelphia as well as the Phoenix substance abuse counselors education requirements. Each region may have different expectations regarding coursework, clinical hours, or exam requirements.

Exploring these pathways ensures that you select the right degree and meet all certification standards for your preferred location, paving the way for a successful and meaningful psychology career.

Best Scientists Citing J. C. Barnes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles