World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
81
Citations
18825
World Ranking
3334
National Ranking
1098

David C. Muddiman publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David C. Muddiman sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 378 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

David C. Muddiman D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David C. Muddiman sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Overview

David C. Muddiman is affiliated with North Carolina State University in the United States. Their research spans multiple scientific disciplines, with a primary focus on chemistry and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. The scientist's work often crosses into specialized subfields such as spectroscopy, molecular biology, ecology, biomedical engineering, and biophysics.

The core areas of Muddiman's investigations include mass spectrometry techniques and applications, metabolomics and mass spectrometry studies, analytical chemistry and chromatography, glycosylation and glycoproteins research, advanced proteomics techniques and applications, isotope analysis in ecology, and spectroscopy techniques in biomedical and chemical research.

Frequent collaborators in their research efforts have included Kenneth P. Garrard, Alexandria L. Sohn, Kevan T. Knizner, Alena N. Joignant, and Russell R. Kibbe.

Muddiman has contributed extensively to the scientific literature, with notable papers such as:

  • The development and application of matrix assisted laser desorption electrospray ionization: The teenage years (2021), Mass Spectrometry Reviews
  • Effects of Prenatal Exposure to a Mixture of Organophosphate Flame Retardants on Placental Gene Expression and Serotonergic Innervation in the Fetal Rat Brain (2020), Toxicological Sciences
  • An adaptive teosinte mexicana introgression modulates phosphatidylcholine levels and is associated with maize flowering time (2022), Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Next-Generation Infrared Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Electrospray Ionization Source for Mass Spectrometry Imaging and High-Throughput Screening (2022), Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
  • Methods for Cryosectioning and Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Whole-Body Zebrafish (2020), Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry

The scientist's work has been published predominantly in a set of recurring journals:

  • Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry
  • Journal of Mass Spectrometry
  • Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
  • Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry
  • Journal of Proteome Research

David C. Muddiman's research integrates advanced methodologies in mass spectrometry with applications spanning both chemical and biological systems. Their expertise includes development of novel ionization sources and mass spectrometry imaging techniques, as well as applications in metabolomics and proteomics.

Best Publications

  • Generation and Detection of Multiply-Charged Peptides and Proteins by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Electrospray Ionization (MALDESI) Fourier Transform Ion Cyclotron Resonance Mass Spectrometry

    Jason S. Sampson;Adam M. Hawkridge;David C. Muddiman

  • MSiReader: An Open-Source Interface to View and Analyze High Resolving Power MS Imaging Files on Matlab Platform

    Guillaume Robichaud;Kenneth P. Garrard;Jeremy A. Barry;David C. Muddiman

  • Performance Characteristics of a New Hybrid Quadrupole Time-of-Flight Tandem Mass Spectrometer (TripleTOF 5600)

    Genna L. Andrews;Brigitte L. Simons;J. Bryce Young;Adam M. Hawkridge

  • Absolute Quantification of the Model Biomarker Prostate-Specific Antigen in Serum by LC-MS/MS Using Protein Cleavage and Isotope Dilution Mass Spectrometry

    David R. Barnidge;Marcia K. Goodmanson;George G. Klee;David C. Muddiman

  • Quantitative mass spectral evidence for the absence of circulating brain natriuretic peptide (BNP-32) in severe human heart failure

    Adam M. Hawkridge;Denise M. Heublein;H. Robert Bergen;Alessandro Cataliotti

  • Improving wood properties for wood utilization through multi-omics integration in lignin biosynthesis

    Jack P. Wang;Megan L. Matthews;Cranos M. Williams;Rui Shi

  • MSiReader v1.0: Evolving Open-Source Mass Spectrometry Imaging Software for Targeted and Untargeted Analyses

    Mark T. Bokhart;Milad Nazari;Kenneth P. Garrard;Kenneth P. Garrard;David C. Muddiman

  • Coordination-driven self-assemblies with a carborane backbone.

    Hershel Jude;Hendrik Disteldorf;Sonja Fischer;Tim Wedge

  • Characterization of PCR products from bacilli using electrospray ionization FTICR mass spectrometry.

    David C. Muddiman;David S. Wunschel;Chuanliang Liu;Ljiljana Paša-Tolić

  • Transition-Metal-Mediated Rational Design and Self-Assembly of Chiral, Nanoscale Supramolecular Polyhedra with Unique T Symmetry†

    Peter J. Stang;Bogdan Olenyuk;David C. Muddiman;Richard D. Smith

  • Mass Spectrometry–Based Biomarker Discovery: Toward a Global Proteome Index of Individuality

    Adam M. Hawkridge;David C. Muddiman

  • Human Proteinpedia enables sharing of human protein data.

    Suresh Mathivanan;Suresh Mathivanan;Mukhtar Ahmed;Natalie G Ahn;Hainard Alexandre

  • Length and Base Composition of PCR-Amplified Nucleic Acids Using Mass Measurements from Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry

    David C. Muddiman;Gordon A. Anderson;and Steven A. Hofstadler;Richard D. Smith

  • A New Family of Multiferrocene Complexes with Enhanced Control of Structure and Stoichiometry via Coordination-Driven Self-Assembly and Their Electrochemistry

    Hai Bo Yang;Koushik Ghosh;Yue Zhao;Brian H. Northrop

  • Charge-state reduction with improved signal intensity of oligonucleotides in electrospray ionization mass spectrometry

    David C. Muddiman;Xueheng Cheng;Harold R. Udseth;Richard D. Smith

  • Hemoglobinase Activity of the Lysine Gingipain Protease (Kgp) of Porphyromonas gingivalis W83

    Janina P. Lewis;Janet A. Dawson;James C. Hannis;David Muddiman

  • Complete Proteomic-Based Enzyme Reaction and Inhibition Kinetics Reveal How Monolignol Biosynthetic Enzyme Families Affect Metabolic Flux and Lignin in Populus trichocarpa

    Jack P. Wang;Jack P. Wang;Punith P. Naik;Hsi-Chuan Chen;Rui Shi

  • Epithelial ovarian cancer: disease etiology, treatment, detection, and investigational gene, metabolite, and protein biomarkers.

    Taufika Islam Williams;Kristina L. Toups;Diana A. Saggese;Kimberly R. Kalli

  • Membrane protein complexes catalyze both 4- and 3-hydroxylation of cinnamic acid derivatives in monolignol biosynthesis

    Hsi-Chuan Chen;Quanzi Li;Christopher M. Shuford;Jie Liu

  • IR-MALDESI Mass Spectrometry Imaging of Biological Tissue Sections Using Ice as a Matrix

    Guillaume Robichaud;Jeremy A. Barry;David C. Muddiman

  • Molecular Architecture via Coordination: Marriage of Crown Ethers and Calixarenes with Molecular Squares, Unique Tetranuclear Metallamacrocycles from Metallacrown Ether and Metallacalixarene Complexes via Self-Assembly

    Peter J. Stang;Danh H. Cao;Kuanchiang Chen;Gary M. Gray

  • A dual electrospray ionization source combined with hexapole accumulation to achieve high mass accuracy of biopolymers in Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry.

    James C. Hannis;David C. Muddiman

Frequent Co-Authors

Vincent L. Chiang
Vincent L. Chiang North Carolina State University
Ronald R. Sederoff
Ronald R. Sederoff North Carolina State University
Peter J. Stang
Peter J. Stang University of Utah
Richard D. Smith
Richard D. Smith Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Ralph A. Dean
Ralph A. Dean North Carolina State University
Hai-Bo Yang
Hai-Bo Yang East China Normal University
Daniel L. Comins
Daniel L. Comins North Carolina State University
Angela D. M. Kashuba
Angela D. M. Kashuba University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Chemistry in the USA opens doors to diverse career opportunities, including roles in healthcare, pharmaceuticals, and forensic science. For those interested in the pharmaceutical industry, exploring the drug rep salary can provide insight into potential earnings and growth paths. This role blends chemistry knowledge with sales skills to promote medications effectively.

Deciding if is it hard to become a pharmacist is a common question. The path demands rigorous education and licensing but offers rewarding careers with strong job stability. Chemistry plays a fundamental role in understanding drug formulation and interactions.

Another intriguing pathway for chemistry graduates is forensic and medical sciences. Careers like autopsy technicians require specialized training; learning how to become an autopsy technician helps clarify necessary education, salary expectations, and job outlook in this field.

For students seeking flexible and cost-effective education, enrolling in one of the cheapest online forensic science degree programs can be a strategic choice. These programs often integrate chemistry with investigative science, preparing graduates for varied forensic careers.

Best Scientists Citing David C. Muddiman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles