World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
36
Citations
8533
World Ranking
8910
National Ranking
3769

Leif A. Havton publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leif A. Havton sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 118 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Leif A. Havton D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Leif A. Havton sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Leif A. Havton is affiliated with the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of medicine and neuroscience, with significant contributions in subfields such as cellular and molecular neuroscience, neurology, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, cognitive neuroscience, and surgery.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics, including:

  • Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Nerve injury and regeneration
  • Barrier Structure and Function Studies
  • Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Some of Havton's recent papers include:

  • Human organ donor-derived vagus nerve biopsies allow for well-preserved ultrastructure and high-resolution mapping of myelinated and unmyelinated fibers, 2021, Scientific Reports
  • Innervation and Neuronal Control of the Mammalian Sinoatrial Node a Comprehensive Atlas, 2021, Circulation Research
  • Rhesus macaque versus rat divergence in the corticospinal projectome, 2022, Neuron
  • Ultraflexible and Stretchable Intrafascicular Peripheral Nerve Recording Device with Axon-Dimension, Cuff-Less Microneedle Electrode Array, 2022, Small
  • Computational modelling of nerve stimulation and recording with peripheral visceral neural interfaces, 2021, Journal of Neural Engineering

Frequent collaborators of Leif A. Havton include:

  • Natália P. Biscola
  • Terry L. Powley
  • Deborah Jaffey
  • Riki Kawaguchi
  • Janet R. Keast

The primary venues where Havton's research has been published consist of:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Scientific Reports
  • Communications Biology
  • The FASEB Journal
  • Circulation Research

Best Publications

  • Long-Distance Growth and Connectivity of Neural Stem Cells after Severe Spinal Cord Injury

    Paul Lu;Yaozhi Wang;Lori Graham;Karla McHale

  • Guidelines for the conduct of clinical trials for spinal cord injury as developed by the ICCP panel: spontaneous recovery after spinal cord injury and statistical power needed for therapeutic clinical trials

    J W Fawcett;A Curt;J D Steeves;W P Coleman

  • Extensive spontaneous plasticity of corticospinal projections after primate spinal cord injury

    Ephron S Rosenzweig;Gregoire Courtine;Gregoire Courtine;Devin L Jindrich;John H Brock

  • Targeted Complement Inhibition at Synapses Prevents Microglial Synaptic Engulfment and Synapse Loss in Demyelinating Disease.

    Sebastian Werneburg;Jonathan Jung;Rejani B. Kunjamma;Seung Kwon Ha

  • Neonatal Chimerization with Human Glial Progenitor Cells Can Both Remyelinate and Rescue the Otherwise Lethally Hypomyelinated Shiverer Mouse

    Martha S. Windrem;Steven J. Schanz;Min Guo;Guo-Feng Tian

  • Restorative effects of human neural stem cell grafts on the primate spinal cord

    Ephron S Rosenzweig;John H Brock;John H Brock;Paul Lu;Paul Lu;Hiromi Kumamaru

  • Diminished Schwann Cell Repair Responses Underlie Age-Associated Impaired Axonal Regeneration

    Michio W. Painter;Michio W. Painter;Amanda Brosius Lutz;Yung Chih Cheng;Alban Latremoliere

  • Chemotropic guidance facilitates axonal regeneration and synapse formation after spinal cord injury

    Laura Taylor Alto;Leif A Havton;James M Conner;Edmund R Hollis

  • Self-Assisted Standing Enabled by Non-Invasive Spinal Stimulation after Spinal Cord Injury

    Dimitry G Sayenko;Mrinal Rath;Adam R Ferguson;Joel W Burdick

  • Extensive spinal decussation and bilateral termination of cervical corticospinal projections in rhesus monkeys.

    Ephron S. Rosenzweig;John H. Brock;Maya D. Culbertson;Paul Lu

  • Regeneration of long-tract axons through sites of spinal cord injury using templated agarose scaffolds.

    Thomas Gros;Jeff S. Sakamoto;Armin Blesch;Leif A. Havton

  • Pronounced species divergence in corticospinal tract reorganization and functional recovery after lateralized spinal cord injury favors primates

    Lucia Friedli;Ephron S. Rosenzweig;Quentin Barraud;Martin Schubert

  • Bilateral corticospinal projections arise from each motor cortex in the macaque monkey: a quantitative study.

    Steve Lacroix;Leif A. Havton;Heather McKay;Hong Yang

  • Local and remote growth factor effects after primate spinal cord injury.

    John H. Brock;Ephron S. Rosenzweig;Armin Blesch;Rod Moseanko

  • Basic Advances and New Avenues in Therapy of Spinal Cord Injury

    Bruce H. Dobkin;Leif A. Havton

  • Motor Axonal Regeneration after Partial and Complete Spinal Cord Transection

    Paul Lu;Armin Blesch;Lori Graham;Yaozhi Wang

  • A white matter stroke model in the mouse: axonal damage, progenitor responses and MRI correlates.

    Elif G. Sozmen;Arunima Kolekar;Leif A. Havton;S. Thomas Carmichael

  • Deficiency of the E3 ubiquitin ligase TRIM32 in mice leads to a myopathy with a neurogenic component.

    Elena Kudryashova;Jun Wu;Leif A. Havton;Melissa J. Spencer

  • Chondroitinase improves anatomical and functional outcomes after primate spinal cord injury.

    Ephron S. Rosenzweig;Ernesto A. Salegio;Justine J. Liang;Janet L. Weber

  • Deacetylation of Miro1 by HDAC6 blocks mitochondrial transport and mediates axon growth inhibition

    Ashley L. Kalinski;Ashley L. Kalinski;Amar N. Kar;John Craver;Andrew P. Tosolini

  • Inosine Alters Gene Expression and Axonal Projections in Neurons Contralateral to a Cortical Infarct and Improves Skilled Use of the Impaired Limb

    Laila Zai;Christina Ferrari;Sathish Subbaiah;Leif A. Havton

  • Autonomic and motor neuron death is progressive and parallel in a lumbosacral ventral root avulsion model of cauda equina injury.

    Thao X. Hoang;Jaime H. Nieto;Niranjala J.K. Tillakaratne;Leif A. Havton

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark H. Tuszynski
Mark H. Tuszynski University of California, San Diego
Armin Blesch
Armin Blesch Indiana University
Adam R. Ferguson
Adam R. Ferguson University of California, San Francisco
Roland R. Roy
Roland R. Roy University of California, Los Angeles
Michael S. Beattie
Michael S. Beattie University of California, San Francisco
Jan-Olof Kellerth
Jan-Olof Kellerth Umeå University
Jacqueline C. Bresnahan
Jacqueline C. Bresnahan University of California, San Francisco
Bruce H. Dobkin
Bruce H. Dobkin University of California, Los Angeles
James M. Conner
James M. Conner University of California, San Diego
Grégoire Courtine
Grégoire Courtine École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience majors often find rewarding career options in related fields like psychology, social work, and therapy. For students looking to build a versatile background, combining neuroscience studies with a graduate degree in mental health or counseling can create new professional opportunities.

If you’re interested in therapy roles, consider exploring marriage and family therapy master's programs. These offer specialized skills in relationship and family counseling. Alternatively, psychology remains a popular path; however, potential students often wonder, how much does masters in psychology cost? Costs can vary, but many online options offer greater flexibility and affordability.

Undergraduates seeking a broader foundation may compare psychology degree cost among universities to find a program that fits their budget. Additionally, those drawn to community and clinical work may want to review the online master's in social work programs available, which often open doors to meaningful roles in social services and health care.

Best Scientists Citing Leif A. Havton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles