World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Chemistry 62 8761 7945 2508 2072 393 14834

Mark J. Kurth publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark J. Kurth between 1978 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark J. Kurth published across 48 years, from 1978 to 2025, averaging 8.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2002. 1 of the 407 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2002. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 7 publications 1982: 1 publication 1983: 3 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 9 publications 1986: 7 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 9 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 12 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 21 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 19 publications 2001: 19 publications 2002: 22 publications 2003: 16 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 5 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 6 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 5 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1978 2025

407 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark J. Kurth: publications per year, 1978 to 2025
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 1
1980 1
1981 7
1982 1
1983 3
1984 3
1985 9
1986 7
1987 4
1988 9
1989 5
1990 8
1991 7
1992 6
1993 12
1994 8
1995 12
1996 9
1997 10
1998 21
1999 12
2000 19
2001 19
2002 22
2003 16
2004 4
2005 11
2006 12
2007 12
2008 14
2009 12
2010 18
2011 18
2012 19
2013 10
2014 8
2015 6
2016 1
2017 5
2018 4
2019 7
2020 1
2021 6
2022 1
2023 5
2024 0
2025 1
Total 407
Download as CSV

Mark J. Kurth publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark J. Kurth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 61–80 to 1,295+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,350. Most scientists, 1,350, have 161–180 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 381–400 publications, is where this scientist sits. 61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61–80 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 393 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
61–80 66
81–100 302
101–120 623
121–140 918
141–160 1,218
161–180 1,350
181–200 1,344
201–220 1,281
221–240 1,216
241–260 1,100
261–280 979
281–300 939
301–320 764
321–340 643
341–360 628
361–380 522
381–400 459 393
401–420 397
421–440 327
441–460 270
461–480 265
481–500 252
501–520 201
521–540 185
541–560 148
561–580 148
581–600 132
601–620 114
621–640 104
641–660 91
661–680 92
681–700 73
701–720 57
721–740 54
741–760 67
761–780 45
781–800 46
801–820 39
821–840 32
841–860 36
861–880 29
881–900 26
901–920 24
921–940 14
941–960 23
961–980 28
981–1,000 15
1,001–1,020 29
1,021–1,040 12
1,041–1,060 19
1,061–1,080 12
1,081–1,100 6
1,101–1,120 8
1,121–1,140 12
1,141–1,160 5
1,161–1,180 6
1,181–1,200 14
1,201–1,220 7
1,221–1,240 2
1,241–1,260 6
1,261–1,280 4
1,281–1,294 6
1,295+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark J. Kurth D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark J. Kurth sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 159+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,051. Most scientists, 1,051, have 56–57 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 62–63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Chemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 17,934 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 289
42–43 612
44–45 808
46–47 776
48–49 835
50–51 861
52–53 872
54–55 933
56–57 1,051
58–59 930
60–61 882
62–63 834 62
64–65 731
66–67 775
68–69 683
70–71 646
72–73 561
74–75 501
76–77 437
78–79 388
80–81 354
82–83 292
84–85 275
86–87 254
88–89 235
90–91 185
92–93 192
94–95 155
96–97 163
98–99 125
100–101 105
102–103 105
104–105 112
106–107 88
108–109 68
110–111 69
112–113 65
114–115 79
116–117 61
118–119 44
120–121 37
122–123 40
124–125 33
126–127 26
128–129 34
130–131 35
132–133 25
134–135 27
136–137 17
138–139 16
140–141 20
142–143 20
144–145 15
146–147 9
148–149 9
150–151 16
152–153 11
154–155 9
156–157 3
158 3
159+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1987 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Mark J. Kurth is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their research spans multiple aspects of biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and medicine, with notable contributions to molecular biology and organic chemistry. Their work frequently intersects with clinical and hepatic studies, addressing biochemical and immunological topics related to liver diseases.

The main fields of study for Kurth include:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Medicine

Within these broader areas, their research delves into several subfields such as:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Organic Chemistry
  • Hepatology
  • Surgery
  • Genetics

Their research topics consistently focus on:

  • Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Chemical Synthesis and Analysis
  • Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
  • Gut microbiota and health
  • Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Cholangiocarcinoma and Gallbladder Cancer Studies
  • MicroRNA in disease regulation

Several recent papers authored or coauthored by Kurth include:

  • "Autoimmunity affecting the biliary tract fuels the immunosurveillance of cholangiocarcinoma," 2021, The Journal of Experimental Medicine
  • "E. coli and the etiology of human PBC: Antimitochondrial antibodies and spreading determinants," 2021, Hepatology
  • "The Evolving Landscape of Fecal Microbial Transplantation," 2023, Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
  • "Solid-Phase Synthesis of Peptidomimetics with Peptide Backbone Modifications," 2021, Asian Journal of Organic Chemistry
  • "Heterocycles as a Peptidomimetic Scaffold: Solid-Phase Synthesis Strategies," 2021, Pharmaceuticals

These publications are found in journals such as:

  • Clinical Reviews in Allergy & Immunology
  • The Journal of Experimental Medicine
  • Hepatology
  • Asian Journal of Organic Chemistry
  • Pharmaceuticals

Frequent co-authors in their work include:

  • Patrick S.C. Leung
  • Weici Zhang
  • Jie Zhu
  • Tihong Shao
  • M. Eric Gershwin

Mark J. Kurth received the Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation award in 1987.

Best Publications

  • Chemical inhibition of the mitochondrial division dynamin reveals its role in Bax/Bak-dependent mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization.

    Ann Cassidy-Stone;Jerry E. Chipuk;Elena Ingerman;Cheng Song

  • Mechanism-based corrector combination restores ΔF508-CFTR folding and function

    Tsukasa Okiyoneda;Guido Veit;Johanna F Dekkers;Miklos Bagdany

  • Patients with primary biliary cirrhosis react against a ubiquitous xenobiotic-metabolizing bacterium*

    Carlo F Selmi;Carlo F Selmi;David L. Balkwill;Pietro Invernizzi;Aftab A. Ansari

  • Carbon-carbon bond forming solid-phase reactions

    Beth A. Lorsbach;Mark J. Kurth

  • "Analogous" Organic Synthesis of Small-Compound Libraries: Validation of Combinatorial Chemistry in Small-Molecule Synthesis

    Chixu Chen;Lisa A. Ahlberg Randall;R. Bryan Miller;A. Daniel Jones

  • Carbon-carbon bond-forming solid-phase reactions. Part II.

    Robert E. Sammelson and;Mark J. Kurth

  • Chemical Xenobiotics and Mitochondrial Autoantigens in Primary Biliary Cirrhosis: Identification of Antibodies against a Common Environmental, Cosmetic, and Food Additive, 2-Octynoic Acid

    Katsushi Amano;Patrick S C Leung;Roman Rieger;Chao Quan

  • Novel CFTR Chloride Channel Activators Identified by Screening of Combinatorial Libraries Based on Flavone and Benzoquinolizinium Lead Compounds

    Luis J.V. Galietta;Mark F. Springsteel;Masahiro Eda;Edmund J. Niedzinski

  • Cyclic amino acid derivatives

    Kyung Ho Park;Mark J. Kurth

  • Loss of tolerance in C57BL/6 mice to the autoantigen E2 subunit of pyruvate dehydrogenase by a xenobiotic with ensuing biliary ductular disease

    Kanji Wakabayashi;Kanji Wakabayashi;Zhe-Xiong Lian;Patrick S C Leung;Yuki Moritoki

  • Immunoreactivity of organic mimeotopes of the E2 component of pyruvate dehydrogenase: connecting xenobiotics with primary biliary cirrhosis

    S Alice Long;Chao Quan;Judy Van de Water;Michael H Nantz

  • Phenylglycine and Sulfonamide Correctors of Defective ΔF508 and G551D Cystic Fibrosis Transmembrane Conductance Regulator Chloride-Channel Gating

    Nicoletta Pedemonte;Nitin D Sonawane;Alessandro Taddei;Jie Hu

  • Identification of 2-nonynoic acid, a cosmetic component, as a potential trigger of primary biliary cirrhosis

    Roman Rieger;Patrick S C Leung;Melissa R Jeddeloh;Mark J Kurth

  • Expansion to seven-membered rings

    Eric J. Kantorowski;Mark J. Kurth

  • Immunization with a Xenobiotic 6-Bromohexanoate Bovine Serum Albumin Conjugate Induces Antimitochondrial Antibodies

    Patrick S. C. Leung;Chao Quan;Ogyi Park;Judy Van de Water

  • Asymmetric induction in Diels‐Alder reactions to acrylates derived from chiral sec‐alcohols. Preliminary communication

    Wolfgang Oppolzer;Mark Kurth;Daniel Reichlin;Christian Chapuis

  • Stannous Chloride in Alcohol: A One-Pot Conversion of 2-Nitro-N-arylbenzamides to 2,3-Dihydro-1H-quinazoline-4-ones

    Choong Leol Yoo;James C. Fettinger;Mark J. Kurth

  • Induction of Primary Biliary Cirrhosis in Guinea Pigs following Chemical Xenobiotic Immunization

    Patrick S Leung;Ogyi Park;Koichi Tsuneyama;Mark J Kurth

  • Library-Based Lead Compound Discovery: Antioxidants by an Analogous Synthesis/Deconvolutive Assay Strategy

    Mark J. Kurth;Lisa A. Ahlberg Randall;Chixu Chen;Christian Melander

  • Polymer-supported synthesis of 2,5-disubstituted tetrahydrofurans

    Xenia Beebe;Neil E. Schore;Mark J. Kurth

Frequent Co-Authors

James C. Fettinger
James C. Fettinger University of California, Davis
Marilyn M. Olmstead
Marilyn M. Olmstead University of California, Davis
Kit S. Lam
Kit S. Lam University of California, Davis
Dean J. Tantillo
Dean J. Tantillo University of California, Davis
Alan S. Verkman
Alan S. Verkman University of California, San Francisco
Patrick S.C. Leung
Patrick S.C. Leung University of California, Davis
M. Eric Gershwin
M. Eric Gershwin University of California, Davis
Aftab A. Ansari
Aftab A. Ansari University of California, Davis
Ross L. Coppel
Ross L. Coppel Monash University
Bruce D. Hammock
Bruce D. Hammock University of California, Davis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Chemistry opens doors to a variety of specialized fields, including forensic science and criminal justice. For those interested in the intersection of science and law, exploring forensic psychology graduate programs online can be a strong next step. These programs combine scientific principles with criminal behavior analysis, providing valuable skills for forensic careers.

Careers in forensic science offer diverse opportunities and competitive salaries. To better understand what paths are available and the potential income, reviewing detailed information on forensic career paths and salary is essential. This insight helps students align their education with realistic professional goals.

Cost considerations are critical when choosing a degree program. Understanding how much does a criminal justice degree cost can help prospective students budget effectively and seek financial aid or scholarships when needed.

Starting with foundational education is key. Many students begin their journey by enrolling in an accredited online criminal justice associate degree, which provides a solid base for further study or entry-level positions in forensic and justice fields. These programs offer flexibility and credibility for online learners.

Best Scientists Citing Mark J. Kurth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles