World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Concetto Spampinato

Concetto Spampinato

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 43 8030 7803 217 215 214 7133

Concetto Spampinato publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Concetto Spampinato between 1970 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Concetto Spampinato published across 57 years, from 1970 to 2026, averaging 6.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 46 publications in 2024. 32 of the 352 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 46. Peak 46 publications in 2024. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 18 publications 2012: 28 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 18 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 27 publications 2022: 17 publications 2023: 37 publications 2024: 46 publications 2025: 31 publications 2026: 1 publication
1970 2026

352 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Concetto Spampinato: publications per year, 1970 to 2026
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 2
2006 6
2007 3
2008 7
2009 4
2010 12
2011 18
2012 28
2013 15
2014 19
2015 9
2016 20
2017 18
2018 8
2019 7
2020 16
2021 27
2022 17
2023 37
2024 46
2025 31
2026 1
Total 352
Download as CSV

Concetto Spampinato publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Concetto Spampinato sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 212–221 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 214 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490 214
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Concetto Spampinato D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Concetto Spampinato sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821 43
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Concetto Spampinato is affiliated with the University of Catania in Italy and has contributed extensively to the fields of Computer Science and Medicine. Their research output includes a significant number of publications focusing on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Oncology.

The scientist has investigated a range of topics in their work, including:

  • COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Domain Adaptation and Few-Shot Learning
  • Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • AI in cancer detection
  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data

Spampinato's recent papers include:

  • A Non-Fungible Token Solution for the Track and Trace of Pharmaceutical Supply Chain (2022, Applied Sciences)
  • Fully automatic segmentation of the mandible based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs) (2021, Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research)
  • Fully automatic segmentation of sinonasal cavity and pharyngeal airway based on convolutional neural networks (2021, American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics)
  • Random forest, gradient boosted machines and deep neural network for stock price forecasting: a comparative analysis on South Korean companies (2020, International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing)
  • Deep Learning Provides Exceptional Accuracy to ECoG-Based Functional Language Mapping for Epilepsy Surgery (2020, Frontiers in Neuroscience)

The frequent co-authors of Concetto Spampinato include:

  • Simone Palazzo
  • Francesco Rundo
  • Federica Proietto Salanitri
  • Giovanni Bellitto
  • Ulaş Bağcı

Spampinato has published predominantly in reputed venues, with multiple contributions to arXiv (Cornell University), as well as publications in Computer Vision and Image Understanding, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Medical Image Analysis, and the International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing.

Best Publications

  • KVASIR: A Multi-Class Image Dataset for Computer Aided Gastrointestinal Disease Detection

    Konstantin Pogorelov;Kristin Ranheim Randel;Carsten Griwodz;Sigrun Losada Eskeland

  • Semi Supervised Semantic Segmentation Using Generative Adversarial Network

    Nasim Souly;Concetto Spampinato;Mubarak Shah

  • Deep Learning for Automated Skeletal Bone Age Assessment in X-Ray Images

    Concetto Spampinato;Simone Palazzo;Daniela Giordano;Marco Aldinucci

  • DETECTING, TRACKING AND COUNTING FISH IN LOW QUALITY UNCONSTRAINED UNDERWATER VIDEOS

    Concetto Spampinato;Yun-Heh Chen-Burger;Gayathri Nadarajan;Robert B. Fisher

  • Automatic fish classification for underwater species behavior understanding

    Concetto Spampinato;Daniela Giordano;Roberto Di Salvo;Yun-Heh Jessica Chen-Burger

  • Deep Learning Human Mind for Automated Visual Classification

    C. Spampinato;S. Palazzo;I. Kavasidis;D. Giordano

  • LifeCLEF 2015: Multimedia Life Species Identification Challenges

    Alexis Joly;Hervé Goëau;Hervé Glotin;Concetto Spampinato

  • Automatic Cephalometric Analysis

    Rosalia Leonardi;Daniela Giordano;Francesco Maiorana;Concetto Spampinato

  • LifeCLEF 2016: Multimedia Life Species Identification Challenges

    Alexis Joly;Hervè Goëau;Hervè Glotin;Concetto Spampinato

  • A research tool for long-term and continuous analysis of fish assemblage in coral-reefs using underwater camera footage

    Bastiaan Johannes Boom;Jiyin He;Simone Palazzo;Phoenix X. Huang

  • Generative Adversarial Networks Conditioned by Brain Signals

    S. Palazzo;C. Spampinato;I. Kavasidis;D. Giordano

  • Brain2Image: Converting Brain Signals into Images

    Isaak Kavasidis;Simone Palazzo;Concetto Spampinato;Daniela Giordano

  • An innovative web-based collaborative platform for video annotation

    Isaak Kavasidis;Simone Palazzo;Roberto Di Salvo;Daniela Giordano

  • An Automatic System for Skeletal Bone Age Measurement by Robust Processing of Carpal and Epiphysial/Metaphysial Bones

    Daniela Giordano;Concetto Spampinato;Giacomo Scarciofalo;Rosalia Leonardi

  • Adaptive Background Modeling Integrated With Luminosity Sensors and Occlusion Processing for Reliable Vehicle Detection

    A. Faro;D. Giordano;C. Spampinato

  • A Saliency-Based Convolutional Neural Network for Table and Chart Detection in Digitized Documents

    Isaak Kavasidis;Carmelo Pino;Simone Palazzo;Francesco Rundo

  • Decoding Brain Representations by Multimodal Learning of Neural Activity and Visual Features

    Simone Palazzo;Concetto Spampinato;Isaak Kavasidis;Daniela Giordano

  • Combining literature text mining with microarray data: advances for system biology modeling.

    Alberto Faro;Daniela Giordano;Concetto Spampinato

  • Superpixel-based video object segmentation using perceptual organization and location prior

    Daniela Giordano;Francesca Murabito;Simone Palazzo;Concetto Spampinato

  • LifeCLEF 2014: Multimedia Life Species Identification Challenges

    Alexis Joly;Hervé Goëau;Hervé Glotin;Concetto Spampinato

  • A Saliency-based Convolutional Neural Network for Table and Chart Detection in Digitized Documents

    I. Kavasidis;S. Palazzo;C. Spampinato;C. Pino

  • Deep Learning Human Mind for Automated Visual Classification

    Concetto Spampinato;Simone Palazzo;Isaak Kavasidis;Daniela Giordano

Frequent Co-Authors

Mubarak Shah
Mubarak Shah University of Central Florida
Michael Riegler
Michael Riegler OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University
Ulas Bagci
Ulas Bagci Northwestern University
Robert B. Fisher
Robert B. Fisher University of Edinburgh
Carsten Griwodz
Carsten Griwodz University of Oslo
Henning Müller
Henning Müller University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland
Sebastiano Battiato
Sebastiano Battiato University of Catania
Mariagiovanna Cantone
Mariagiovanna Cantone University of Catania
Rita Bella
Rita Bella University of Catania
Pål Halvorsen
Pål Halvorsen OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens several dynamic pathways—not just in traditional degree formats, but also through online study. Prospective students often wonder about best majors for the future. Computer Science consistently ranks among these, thanks to its versatility and strong job outlook across tech and non-tech industries.

For learners focused on accessibility, finding the easiest masters programs to get into can be a strategic move. Many universities now offer flexible online master’s in Computer Science, allowing you to balance study with work or other commitments.

Affordability is also front of mind for many students. Those seeking doctoral credentials may be interested in the cheapest doctorate degree options. This can help minimize student debt while maximizing career prospects. Additionally, if your goals include educational leadership, the cheapest edd programs provide fast-track, cost-effective routes to advanced qualifications.

By considering the full range of related online degrees and career pathways, students can align their academic journey with their budget, schedule, and long-term ambitions in Computer Science.

Best Scientists Citing Concetto Spampinato

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles