World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 65 2820 2585 39 38 322 17034

Andrea Gaggioli publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrea Gaggioli between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrea Gaggioli published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 16.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2021. 32 of the 402 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2021. 2001: 3 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 11 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 8 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 14 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 26 publications 2013: 27 publications 2014: 20 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 27 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 23 publications 2019: 24 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 28 publications 2022: 14 publications 2023: 21 publications 2024: 14 publications 2025: 18 publications
2001 2025

402 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrea Gaggioli: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 3
2002 1
2003 11
2004 8
2005 4
2006 6
2007 10
2008 8
2009 18
2010 14
2011 11
2012 26
2013 27
2014 20
2015 17
2016 27
2017 23
2018 23
2019 24
2020 26
2021 28
2022 14
2023 21
2024 14
2025 18
Total 402
Download as CSV

Andrea Gaggioli publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrea Gaggioli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 321–330 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 322 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76 322
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrea Gaggioli D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrea Gaggioli sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290 65
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Andrea Gaggioli is affiliated with the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart in Italy. Their research primarily focuses on psychology, with a total of 93 publications in this main field of study. Within psychology, Gaggioli has contributed extensively to several subfields including social psychology, clinical psychology, human-computer interaction, cognitive neuroscience, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The scientist's work addresses a variety of topics, notably:

  • Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Creativity in Education and Neuroscience
  • Media Influence and Health
  • Aesthetic Perception and Analysis
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions

Gaggioli has published frequently in a range of venues, with the most publications in:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Frontiers in Psychology
  • Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • PLoS ONE

Their notable recent papers include:

  • Effects of COVID-19 Home Confinement on Eating Behaviour and Physical Activity: Results of the ECLB-COVID19 International Online Survey (2020), published in Nutrients
  • COVID-19 Home Confinement Negatively Impacts Social Participation and Life Satisfaction: A Worldwide Multicenter Study (2020), published in International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Effects of home confinement on mental health and lifestyle behaviours during the COVID-19 outbreak: Insight from the ECLB-COVID19 multicenter study (2020), published in Biology of Sport
  • Psychological consequences of COVID-19 home confinement: The ECLB-COVID19 multicenter study (2020), published in PLoS ONE
  • Usability Issues of Clinical and Research Applications of Virtual Reality in Older People: A Systematic Review (2020), published in Frontiers in Human Neuroscience

Among frequent co-authors, Gaggioli has collaborated extensively with Alice Chirico, Giuseppe Riva, Pietro Cipresso, Marta Pizzolante, and Annemarie Braakman-Jansen, with the number of joint publications ranging from 13 to 48.

In terms of book publications, Gaggioli has contributed a title called Networked Flow in Creative Collaboration (2020), published by Informa.

Best Publications

  • Affective Interactions Using Virtual Reality: The Link between Presence and Emotions

    Giuseppe Riva;Fabrizia Mantovani;Claret Samantha Capideville;Alessandra Preziosa

  • Positive technology: using interactive technologies to promote positive functioning.

    Giuseppe Riva;Rosa María Baños;Cristina Botella;Brenda K. Wiederhold

  • Transforming Experience: The Potential of Augmented Reality and Virtual Reality for Enhancing Personal and Clinical Change

    Giuseppe Riva;Rosa M. Baños;Cristina Botella;Fabrizia Mantovani

  • Virtual reality training for health-care professionals.

    Fabrizia Mantovani;Gianluca Castelnuovo;Andrea Gaggioli;Giuseppe Riva

  • COVID-19 Home Confinement Negatively Impacts Social Participation and Life Satisfaction: A Worldwide Multicenter Study.

    Achraf Ammar;Achraf Ammar;Hamdi Chtourou;Omar Boukhris;Khaled Trabelsi

  • A second life for eHealth: prospects for the use of 3-D virtual worlds in clinical psychology.

    Alessandra Gorini;Andrea Gaggioli;Cinzia Vigna;Giuseppe Riva

  • Effectiveness of Immersive Videos in Inducing Awe: An Experimental Study.

    Alice Chirico;Pietro Cipresso;David B. Yaden;Federica Biassoni

  • The development of the Awe Experience Scale (AWE-S): A multifactorial measure for a complex emotion

    David B. Yaden;Scott Barry Kaufman;Elizabeth Hyde;Alice Chirico

  • Psychological consequences of COVID-19 home confinement: The ECLB-COVID19 multicenter study.

    Achraf Ammar;Achraf Ammar;Patrick Mueller;Patrick Mueller;Khaled Trabelsi;Hamdi Chtourou

  • Designing Awe in Virtual Reality: An Experimental Study.

    Alice Chirico;Francesco Ferrise;Lorenzo Cordella;Andrea Gaggioli

  • The present and future of positive technologies

    Cristina Botella;Giuseppe Riva;Andrea Gaggioli;Brenda K. Wiederhold

  • Virtual Reality for Research in Social Neuroscience

    Thomas D. Parsons;Andrea Gaggioli;Giuseppe Riva

  • When Virtual Feels Real: Comparing Emotional Responses and Presence in Virtual and Natural Environments.

    Alice Chirico;Andrea Gaggioli

  • Maximizing the Impact of e-Therapy and Serious Gaming: Time for a Paradigm Shift

    Theresa M. Fleming;Derek de Beurs;Yasser Khazaal;Andrea Gaggioli

  • A mobile data collection platform for mental health research

    Andrea Gaggioli;Giovanni Pioggia;Gennaro Tartarisco;Giovanni Baldus

  • The Potential of Virtual Reality for the Investigation of Awe.

    Alice Chirico;David Bryce Yaden;Giuseppe Riva;Andrea Gaggioli

  • Intergenerational Group Reminiscence: A Potentially Effective Intervention to Enhance Elderly Psychosocial Wellbeing and to Improve Children's Perception of Aging

    Andrea Gaggioli;Luca Morganti;Silvio Bonfiglio;Chiara Scaratti

  • Virtual reality and mobile phones in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorders: a phase-2 clinical trial

    Claudia Repetto;Andrea Gaggioli;Federica Pallavicini;Pietro Cipresso

  • Virtual Reality for Enhancing the Cognitive Behavioral Treatment of Obesity With Binge Eating Disorder: Randomized Controlled Study With One-Year Follow-up

    Gian Luca Cesa;Gian Mauro Manzoni;Monica Bacchetta;Gianluca Castelnuovo

Frequent Co-Authors

Giuseppe Riva
Giuseppe Riva Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Pietro Cipresso
Pietro Cipresso Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Silvia Serino
Silvia Serino University of Milano-Bicocca
Daniela Villani
Daniela Villani Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Gianluca Castelnuovo
Gianluca Castelnuovo Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Alessandra Gorini
Alessandra Gorini University of Milan
Cristina Botella
Cristina Botella Jaume I University
Brenda K. Wiederhold
Brenda K. Wiederhold Scripps Health
Enrico Molinari
Enrico Molinari Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Robbert Sanderman
Robbert Sanderman University of Groningen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Psychology degree in the USA can open doors to a variety of online degrees and career pathways, especially within fields like social work. Many students with a background in psychology choose to further their education to meet state-specific requirements to become licensed professionals.

Social work is a common career option for psychology graduates, but requirements for entry vary by location. For example, you can review the social worker education requirements in Hawaii to understand the local pathways in that state. Similarly, different states such as Idaho, Illinois, and Indiana each have their own standards regarding the qualifications needed. You can explore the social worker education requirements in Idaho, learn about the degree needed to be a social worker in Illinois, and get details on the degree needed to be a social worker in Indiana.

Understanding these requirements can help you choose the right program—whether it’s an online bachelor’s or master’s in psychology or social work—and guide you toward a fulfilling, licensed career in the field.

Best Scientists Citing Andrea Gaggioli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles