World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
44
Citations
8566
World Ranking
2990
National Ranking
182

Thomas Borsch publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Borsch sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 120 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Thomas Borsch D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Thomas Borsch sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Angiosperm phylogeny based on matK sequence information

    Khidir W. Hilu;Thomas Borsch;Kai Müller;Douglas E. Soltis

  • Phylogeny of Amaranthaceae and Chenopodiaceae and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis.

    G. Kadereit;T. Borsch;K. Weising;H. Freitag

  • Noncoding plastid trnT-trnF sequences reveal a well resolved phylogeny of basal angiosperms

    T. Borsch;K. W. Hilu;D. Quandt;V. Wilde

  • A taxonomic backbone for the global synthesis of species diversity in the angiosperm order Caryophyllales

    Patricia Hernández-Ledesma;Walter G. Berendsohn;Thomas Borsch;Sabine Von Mering

  • Smallest angiosperm genomes found in lentibulariaceae, with chromosomes of bacterial size.

    J. Greilhuber;T. Borsch;K. Müller;A. Worberg

  • Multigene Analyses of Monocot Relationships

    Mark W. Chase;Michael F. Fay;Dion S. Devey;Oliver Maurin

  • Mutational dynamics and phylogenetic utility of noncoding chloroplast DNA

    Thomas Borsch;Dietmar Quandt

  • Evolution of Piperales—matK gene and trnK intron sequence data reveal lineage specific resolution contrast

    Stefan Wanke;M. Alejandra Jaramillo;Thomas Borsch;Marie-Stéphanie Samain

  • Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetic Utility of the petD Group II Intron: A Case Study in Basal Angiosperms

    Cornelia Löhne;Thomas Borsch

  • Phylogenetics of amaranthaceae based on matK/trnK sequence data-evidence from parsimony, likelihood, and bayesian analyses

    Kai MüLLER;Thomas Borsch

  • Phylogenetic analyses of basal angiosperms based on nine plastid, mitochondrial, and nuclear genes

    Yin Long Qiu;Yin Long Qiu;Yin Long Qiu;Olena Dombrovska;Olena Dombrovska;Olena Dombrovska;Jungho Lee;Jungho Lee;Jungho Lee;Libo Li;Libo Li

  • Phylogenetic analysis of Magnoliales and Myristicaceae based on multiple data sets: implications for character evolution

    Hervé Sauquet;James A. Doyle;Tanya Scharaschkin;Thomas Borsch

  • Towards resolving Lamiales relationships: insights from rapidly evolving chloroplast sequences

    Bastian Schäferhoff;Andreas Fleischmann;Eberhard Fischer;Dirk C Albach

  • A novel phylogeny-based generic classification for Chenopodium sensu lato, and a tribal rearrangement of Chenopodioideae (Chenopodiaceae)

    Susy Fuentes-Bazan;Pertti Uotila;Thomas Borsch

  • Evolution of Carnivory in Lentibulariaceae and the Lamiales

    K. Müller;T. Borsch;L. Legendre;S. Porembski

  • Phylogenetic analysis of Nymphaeales using fast-evolving and noncoding chloroplast markers

    Cornelia Löhne;Thomas Borsch;John H. Wiersema

  • Phylogeny of Aristolochiaceae based on parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian analyses of trnL-trnF sequences

    C. Neinhuis;S. Wanke;K. W. Hilu;K. Müller

  • Phylogeny and evolutionary patterns in Nymphaeales: integrating genes, genomes and morphology

    Thomas Borsch;Cornelia Löhne;John Wiersema

  • World Flora Online: Placing taxonomists at the heart of a definitive and comprehensive global resource on the world's plants

    Thomas Borsch;Walter Berendsohn;Eduardo Dalcin;Maïté Delmas

  • Phylogeny of Nymphaea (Nymphaeaceae): Evidence from Substitutions and Microstructural Changes in the Chloroplast trnT‐trnF Region

    Thomas Borsch;Khidir W. Hilu;John H. Wiersema;Cornelia Löhne

  • Phylogenetic utility of rapidly evolving DNA at high taxonomical levels: contrasting matK, trnT-F, and rbcL in basal angiosperms.

    Kai F. Müller;Thomas Borsch;Khidir W. Hilu

  • Phylogeny of basal eudicots: Insights from non-coding and rapidly evolving DNA

    Andreas Worberg;Dietmar Quandt;Anna-Magdalena Barniske;Cornelia Löhne

  • The taxonomic distribution of C4 photosynthesis in Amaranthaceae sensu stricto.

    Rowan F. Sage;Tammy L. Sage;Robert W. Pearcy;Thomas Borsch

  • Towards a species level tree of the globally diverse genus Chenopodium (Chenopodiaceae).

    Susy Fuentes-Bazan;Susy Fuentes-Bazan;Guilhem Mansion;Thomas Borsch

  • Floristic composition and environmental factors characterizing coffee forests in southwest Ethiopia

    Tadesse Woldemariam Gole;Thomas Borsch;Manfred Denich;Demel Teketay

  • What does it take to resolve relationships and to identify species with molecular markers? An example from the epiphytic Rhipsalideae (Cactaceae)

    Nadja Korotkova;Thomas Borsch;Dietmar Quandt;Nigel P. Taylor

  • Pollen characters and DNA sequence data converge on a monophyletic genus Iresine (Amaranthaceae, Caryophyllales) and help to elucidate its species diversity

    Thomas Borsch;Hilda Flores‐Olvera;Silvia Zumaya;Kai Müller

  • Positive correlations between hypericin and putative precursors detected in the quantitative secondary metabolite spectrum of Hypericum

    Souvik Kusari;Sebastian Zühlke;Thomas Borsch;Michael Spiteller

Frequent Co-Authors

Dietmar Quandt
Dietmar Quandt University of Bonn
Khidir W. Hilu
Khidir W. Hilu Virginia Tech
Wilhelm Barthlott
Wilhelm Barthlott University of Bonn
Hossein Akhani
Hossein Akhani University of Tehran
Stefan Porembski
Stefan Porembski University of Rostock
Pamela S. Soltis
Pamela S. Soltis University of Florida
Fernando O. Zuloaga
Fernando O. Zuloaga National Scientific and Technical Research Council
Susanne S. Renner
Susanne S. Renner Washington University in St. Louis
Mark W. Chase
Mark W. Chase Royal Botanic Gardens
Robert Lücking
Robert Lücking Freie Universität Berlin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Thomas Borsch

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles