World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 81 16681 15693 8370 7744 437 23332

Robert M. Weiss publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert M. Weiss between 1958 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert M. Weiss published across 69 years, from 1958 to 2026, averaging 7 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2013. 8 of the 486 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1958 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2013. 1958: 1 publication 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 1 publication 1963: 0 publications 1964: 1 publication 1965: 1 publication 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 1 publication 1969: 1 publication 1970: 2 publications 1971: 6 publications 1972: 4 publications 1973: 6 publications 1974: 4 publications 1975: 2 publications 1976: 8 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 2 publications 1979: 4 publications 1980: 5 publications 1981: 5 publications 1982: 4 publications 1983: 4 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 11 publications 1987: 11 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 10 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 8 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 17 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 17 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 12 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 7 publications 2026: 1 publication
1958 2026

486 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert M. Weiss: publications per year, 1958 to 2026
Year Publications
1958 1
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 1
1963 0
1964 1
1965 1
1966 0
1967 0
1968 1
1969 1
1970 2
1971 6
1972 4
1973 6
1974 4
1975 2
1976 8
1977 4
1978 2
1979 4
1980 5
1981 5
1982 4
1983 4
1984 3
1985 4
1986 11
1987 11
1988 4
1989 10
1990 5
1991 7
1992 2
1993 5
1994 8
1995 5
1996 5
1997 10
1998 3
1999 7
2000 6
2001 7
2002 12
2003 11
2004 9
2005 5
2006 17
2007 19
2008 17
2009 18
2010 12
2011 14
2012 16
2013 25
2014 10
2015 14
2016 11
2017 8
2018 9
2019 6
2020 10
2021 15
2022 11
2023 23
2024 7
2025 7
2026 1
Total 486
Download as CSV

Robert M. Weiss publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Weiss sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 421–440 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 437 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806 437
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert M. Weiss D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert M. Weiss sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80–81 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972 81
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Robert M. Weiss is affiliated with the University of Iowa in the United States. Their primary field of study is Medicine, with substantial work specifically in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Additional subfields include Materials Chemistry, Molecular Biology, Surgery, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The researcher's work covers a range of topics including Crystallization and Solubility Studies, X-ray Diffraction in Crystallography, Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors, Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments, Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling, Signaling Pathways in Disease, and Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms.

Recent publications illustrate a focus on cardiac and cardiovascular research, with several notable papers:

  • "Mitochondrial pyruvate carriers are required for myocardial stress adaptation," 2020, Nature Metabolism
  • "Secreted Factors From Proinflammatory Macrophages Promote an Osteoblast-Like Phenotype in Valvular Interstitial Cells," 2020, Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology
  • "Extracellular matrix stiffness controls cardiac valve myofibroblast activation through epigenetic remodeling," 2022, Bioengineering & Translational Medicine
  • "Tumor necrosis factor-α promotes and exacerbates calcification in heart valve myofibroblast populations," 2021, The FASEB Journal
  • "Failure to vasodilate in response to salt loading blunts renal blood flow and causes salt-sensitive hypertension," 2020, Cardiovascular Research

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Robert M. Weiss include Jana M. Holthoff, Elric Engelage, Shun-Guang Wei, Kathy Zimmerman, and Yang Yu.

The venues where the researcher most often publishes are diverse but emphasize biomedical and cardiovascular disciplines. These venues include:

  • The Cambridge Structural Database
  • Circulation Research
  • Physiology
  • The FASEB Journal
  • Circulation

Among awards, Robert M. Weiss is recognized as a Member of the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • A dynamic pathway for calcium-independent activation of CaMKII by methionine oxidation

    Jeffrey R. Erickson;Mei ling A. Joiner;Xiaoqun Guan;William Kutschke

  • Effect of a monoclonal antibody to PCSK9, REGN727/SAR236553, to reduce low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia on stable statin dose with or without ezetimibe therapy: a phase 2 randomised controlled trial

    Evan A Stein;Dan Gipe;Jean Bergeron;Daniel Gaudet

  • Disruption of the Sarcoglycan–Sarcospan Complex in Vascular Smooth Muscle: A Novel Mechanism for Cardiomyopathy and Muscular Dystrophy

    Ramon Coral-Vazquez;Ronald D Cohn;Steven A Moore;Joseph A Hill

  • T-tubule remodeling during transition from hypertrophy to heart failure.

    Sheng Wei;Ang Guo;Biyi Chen;William J. Kutschke

  • Cardiac Hypertrophy Is Not a Required Compensatory Response to Short-Term Pressure Overload

    Joseph A. Hill;Mohsen Karimi;William Kutschke;Robin L. Davisson

  • Abnormal Coronary Function in Mice Deficient in α1H T-type Ca2+ Channels

    Chien Chang Chen;Kathryn G. Lamping;Kathryn G. Lamping;Daniel W. Nuno;Daniel W. Nuno;Rita Barresi

  • Calcific aortic valve stenosis: methods, models, and mechanisms.

    Jordan D. Miller;Robert M. Weiss;Donald D. Heistad

  • Bacterial infection induces nitric oxide synthase in human neutrophils.

    M A Wheeler;S D Smith;G García-Cardeña;C F Nathan

  • Sarcolemma-localized nNOS is required to maintain activity after mild exercise

    Yvonne M. Kobayashi;Erik P. Rader;Robert W. Crawford;Nikhil K. Iyengar

  • Oxidized Ca(2+)/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II triggers atrial fibrillation.

    Anil Purohit;Adam G. Rokita;Xiaoqun Guan;Biyi Chen

  • A knockin mouse model of the Bardet–Biedl syndrome 1 M390R mutation has cilia defects, ventriculomegaly, retinopathy, and obesity

    Roger E. Davis;Ruth E. Swiderski;Kamal Rahmouni;Darryl Y. Nishimura

  • Alirocumab as Add-On to Atorvastatin Versus Other Lipid Treatment Strategies: ODYSSEY OPTIONS I Randomized Trial

    Harold Bays;Daniel Gaudet;Robert Weiss;Juan Lima Ruiz

  • Diabetes increases mortality after myocardial infarction by oxidizing CaMKII.

    Min Luo;Xiaoqun Guan;Elizabeth D. Luczak;Di Lang

  • Oxidation of CaMKII determines the cardiotoxic effects of aldosterone

    B. Julie He;Mei Ling A. Joiner;Madhu V. Singh;Elizabeth D. Luczak

  • Leptin resistance contributes to obesity and hypertension in mouse models of Bardet-Biedl syndrome.

    Kamal Rahmouni;Melissa A. Fath;Seongjin Seo;Daniel R. Thedens

  • Calcific Aortic Valve Stenosis in Old Hypercholesterolemic Mice

    Robert M. Weiss;Masuo Ohashi;Jordan D. Miller;Stephen G. Young

  • Oxidized CaMKII causes cardiac sinus node dysfunction in mice

    Paari Dominic Swaminathan;Anil Purohit;Siddarth Soni;Niels Voigt;Niels Voigt

  • Discovery of a Spontaneous Genetic Mouse Model of Preeclampsia

    Robin L. Davisson;Darren S. Hoffmann;Genelle M. Butz;Gilbert Aldape

  • The Effects of Chronic Fluoxetine Treatment on Chronic Mild Stress-Induced Cardiovascular Changes and Anhedonia

    Angela J. Grippo;Terry G. Beltz;Robert M. Weiss;Alan Kim Johnson

  • Diabetes increases mortality after myocardial infarction by oxidizing CaMKII (vol 123, pg 1262, 2013)

    Min Luo;Xiaoqun Guan;Elizabeth D. Luczak;Di Lang

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald D. Heistad
Donald D. Heistad University of Iowa
Mark E. Anderson
Mark E. Anderson Johns Hopkins University
Curt D. Sigmund
Curt D. Sigmund Medical College of Wisconsin
Alan Kim Johnson
Alan Kim Johnson University of Iowa
Richard E. Kerber
Richard E. Kerber University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Kamal Rahmouni
Kamal Rahmouni University of Iowa Health Care
E. Dale Abel
E. Dale Abel University of California, Los Angeles
Kevin P. Campbell
Kevin P. Campbell University of Iowa
Evan A. Stein
Evan A. Stein Medpace (United States)
Kristi S. Anseth
Kristi S. Anseth University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a medical career in the USA doesn’t mean you must become a physician. There are diverse pathways and online degree programs tailored to different interests, timeframes, and lifestyles.

Many students are drawn to allied health professions or administrative roles for their flexibility and growing demand. For example, programs that offer financial aid for medical billing and coding make this field especially accessible and a popular starting point in healthcare.

The nursing route also offers alternatives. Some nursing schools that don't require teas test eliminate common barriers for prospective students, allowing a faster entry into this rewarding profession.

For those interested in healthcare management, consider pursuing healthcare administration degree programs. These degrees prepare you to lead and manage medical facilities, clinics, or hospital departments.

Registered nurses who wish to advance can explore asn to fnp programs, which bridge the gap from an associate degree in nursing (ADN) to become a Family Nurse Practitioner (FNP).

All these online options provide flexible, in-demand career paths within the evolving landscape of American healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing Robert M. Weiss

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles