World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
83
Citations
23527
World Ranking
15686
National Ranking
7893

Richard E. Kerber publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard E. Kerber sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 382 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Richard E. Kerber D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard E. Kerber sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Richard E. Kerber was affiliated with the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics in the United States. Their academic career focused primarily on medical research, with a total of 32 publications in the field of Medicine. Within this broad domain, they concentrated on several subfields including Emergency Medicine, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health, and Biomedical Engineering.

The main topics of Kerber's research encompassed Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation, Neonatal Respiratory Health Research, Respiratory Support and Mechanisms, Neuroscience of respiration and sleep, Trauma and Emergency Care Studies, Maternal and fetal healthcare, and Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices.

The scientist contributed papers to a variety of academic publication venues, with frequent publications appearing in:

  • Resuscitation
  • Circulation
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
  • PEDIATRICS
  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Kerber collaborated extensively with a group of co-authors who appeared regularly in their publications. These included:

  • Peter T. Morley
  • David Berry
  • Jestin N. Carlson
  • Pascal Cassan
  • Wei-Tien Chang

Among the notable papers published throughout their career are several iterations of international consensus reports on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science, appearing between 2022 and 2024. These publications appeared in reputable venues such as Circulation and Resuscitation and included the following titles:

  • 2022 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces (2022, Circulation)
  • 2023 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces (2023, Circulation)
  • 2022 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces (2022, Resuscitation)
  • 2024 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces (2024, Circulation)
  • 2023 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces (2023, Resuscitation)

Richard E. Kerber was recognized as a member of the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices--summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (ACC/AHA/NASPE Committee to Update the 1998 Pacemaker Guidelines).

    Gabriel Gregoratos;Jonathan Abrams;Andrew E. Epstein;Roger A. Freedman

  • ACC/AHA/NASPE 2002 Guideline Update for Implantation of Cardiac Pacemakers and Antiarrhythmia Devices: Summary Article

    Gabriel Gregoratos;Jonathan Abrams;Andrew E. Epstein

  • Part 8: Advanced Life Support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations

    Laurie J. Morrison;Charles D. Deakin;Peter T. Morley;Peter T. Morley;Clifton W. Callaway

  • Recommendations for a standardized report for adult transthoracic echocardiography: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography's Nomenclature and Standards Committee and Task Force for a Standardized Echocardiography Report.

    Julius M. Gardin;David B. Adams;Pamela S. Douglas;Harvey Feigenbaum

  • Automatic External Defibrillators for Public Access Defibrillation: Recommendations for Specifying and Reporting Arrhythmia Analysis Algorithm Performance, Incorporating New Waveforms, and Enhancing Safety A Statement for Health Professionals From the American Heart Association Task Force on Automatic External Defibrillation, Subcommittee on AED Safety and Efficacy

    Richard E. Kerber;Lance B. Becker;Joseph D. Bourland;Richard O. Cummins

  • Cardiac Hypertrophy Is Not a Required Compensatory Response to Short-Term Pressure Overload

    Joseph A. Hill;Mohsen Karimi;William Kutschke;Robin L. Davisson

  • Part 6: Electrical therapies: Automated external defibrillators, defibrillation, cardioversion, and pacing: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care

    Mark S. Link;Dianne L. Atkins;Rod S. Passman;Henry R. Halperin

  • Utstein-Style Guidelines for Uniform Reporting of Laboratory CPR Research

    Ahamed H. Idris;Lance B. Becker;Joseph P. Ornato;Jerris R. Hedges

  • Visual estimates of percent diameter coronary stenosis: "a battered gold standard".

    Melvin L Marcus;David J Skorton;Maryl R Johnson;Steve M Collins

  • Transthoracic resistance in human defibrillation. Influence of body weight, chest size, serial shocks, paddle size and paddle contact pressure.

    R E Kerber;J Grayzel;R Hoyt;M Marcus

  • Biphasic versus monophasic shock waveform for conversion of atrial fibrillation: the results of an international randomized, double-blind multicenter trial.

    Richard L. Page;Richard E. Kerber;T. James K. Russell;Tom Trouton

  • Energy, current, and success in defibrillation and cardioversion: clinical studies using an automated impedance-based method of energy adjustment

    R E Kerber;J B Martins;M G Kienzle;L Constantin

  • Delineation of the extent of coronary atherosclerosis by high-frequency epicardial echocardiography.

    David D. McPherson;Loren F. Hiratzka;Wade C. Lamberth;Berkeley Brandt

  • Correlation between echocardiographically demonstrated segmental dyskinesis and regional myocardial perfusion.

    R E Kerber;M L Marcus;J Ehrhardt;R Wilson

  • Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiac care, III: Adult advanced cardiac life support

    R. E. Kerber;J. P. Ornato;D. D. Brown;L. Chameides

  • The effects of atrial fibrillation on atrial pressure-volume and flow relationships.

    C W White;R E Kerber;H R Weiss;M L Marcus

  • Heterogeneity of left ventricular segmental wall thickening and excursion in 2-dimensional echocardiograms of normal human subjects

    Natesa G. Pandian;David J. Skorton;Steve M. Collins;Herman L. Falsetti

  • Coronary arterial remodeling studied by high-frequency epicardial echocardiography: an early compensatory mechanism in patients with obstructive coronary atherosclerosis.

    David D. McPherson;Sara J. Sirna;Loren F. Hiratzka;Linda Thorpe

  • Effect of renal hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy on the coronary circulation in dogs

    Thomas M. Mueller;Melvin L. Marcus;Richard E. Kerber;John A. Young

  • Guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiac care, V: Pediatric basic life support

    R. E. Kerber;J. P. Ornato;D. D. Brown;L. Chameides

Frequent Co-Authors

Melvin L. Marcus
Melvin L. Marcus University of Iowa
Natesa G. Pandian
Natesa G. Pandian Tufts Medical Center
Francois M. Abboud
Francois M. Abboud University of Iowa
Harold P. Adams
Harold P. Adams University of Iowa
Joseph P. Ornato
Joseph P. Ornato Virginia Commonwealth University
Garry R. Buettner
Garry R. Buettner University of Iowa
Tom P. Aufderheide
Tom P. Aufderheide Medical College of Wisconsin
Lance B. Becker
Lance B. Becker Hofstra University
Robert M. Weiss
Robert M. Weiss University of Iowa
Joseph S. Alpert
Joseph S. Alpert University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of medicine offers a wide range of flexible online degree programs to help students and working professionals advance their healthcare careers. Those seeking high-level roles in nursing can now complete their education more efficiently thanks to short dnp programs, which reduce the time needed to earn a terminal nursing degree. Similarly, the growing number of dnp programs online provides learners with more accessible routes to leadership positions in nursing.

For individuals aiming to quickly start their clinical journey, the fastest lpn program options enable rapid entry into patient care roles with minimal on-campus requirements. Additionally, mental health remains a vital specialty, and aspiring psychiatric nurse practitioners can benefit from targeted, accelerated education through psych nurse practitioner programs.

Exploring these flexible online pathways can help you align your educational choices with your career goals, schedule, and desired pace of study—making a rewarding healthcare career more accessible than ever before.

Best Scientists Citing Richard E. Kerber

Recently Published Articles