World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
103
Citations
49027
World Ranking
7236
National Ranking
3793

Arthur E. Weyman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur E. Weyman sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 425 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Arthur E. Weyman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Arthur E. Weyman sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 103 D-Index — 65th percentile

65% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2001 - Gifted Teacher Award, American College of Cardiology (ACC)

Overview

Arthur E. Weyman is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has contributed to the field of medicine with a particular focus on cardiology and related subfields. Their research work spans several core areas including cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, epidemiology, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

The scientist's main topics of research include:

  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

Arthur E. Weyman's recent published paper is titled "Prognostic importance of the transmitral pressure gradient in mitral annular calcification with associated mitral valve dysfunction," published in 2020 in the European Heart Journal. This work has accumulated 52 citations.

Their frequent co-authors have included:

  • Philippe B. Bertrand
  • Timothy W. Churchill
  • Evin Yucel
  • Mayooran Namasivayam
  • Samuel Bernard

Arthur E. Weyman's publications have appeared in the European Heart Journal, indicating an engagement with leading cardiovascular research venues.

In recognition of their contributions, Arthur E. Weyman received the Gifted Teacher Award from the American College of Cardiology (ACC) in 2001.

Best Publications

  • Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements.

    D J Sahn;A DeMaria;J Kisslo;A Weyman

  • Percutaneous balloon dilatation of the mitral valve: an analysis of echocardiographic variables related to outcome and the mechanism of dilatation.

    G T Wilkins;A E Weyman;V M Abascal;P C Block

  • Report of the American Society of Echocardiography Committee on Nomenclature and Standards in Two-dimensional Echocardiography.

    W L Henry;A DeMaria;R Gramiak;D L King

  • Atrial enlargement as a consequence of atrial fibrillation. A prospective echocardiographic study.

    A J Sanfilippo;V M Abascal;M Sheehan;L B Oertel

  • Clinical Correlates and Reference Intervals for Pulmonary Artery Systolic Pressure Among Echocardiographically Normal Subjects

    Brendan M. McQuillan;Michael H. Picard;Marcia Leavitt;Arthur E. Weyman

  • Principles and Practice of Echocardiography

    Arthur E. Weyman

  • Preload dependence of doppler-derived indexes of left ventricular diastolic function in humans

    Christopher Y. Choong;Howard C. Herrmann;Arthur E. Weyman;Michael A. Fifer

  • Three-dimensional echocardiographic reconstruction of the mitral valve, with implications for the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse.

    R A Levine;M D Handschumacher;A J Sanfilippo;A A Hagege

  • Echocardiographic Doppler evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function. Physics and physiology.

    James D. Thomas;Arthur E. Weyman

  • Cross-Sectional Echocardiography

    Arthur E. Weyman

  • Combined influence of ventricular loading and relaxation on the transmitral flow velocity profile in dogs measured by Doppler echocardiography.

    C Y Choong;V M Abascal;J D Thomas;J L Guerrero

  • Assessing atherosclerotic plaque morphology: comparison of optical coherence tomography and high frequency intravascular ultrasound.

    M. E. Brezinski;G. J. Tearney;N. J. Weissman;Stephen Allen Boppart

  • Cardiovascular and humoral responses to extremes of sodium intake in normal black and white men.

    F C Luft;L I Rankin;R Bloch;A E Weyman

  • The relationship of mitral annular shape to the diagnosis of mitral valve prolapse.

    R A Levine;M O Triulzi;P Harrigan;A E Weyman

  • Echocardiographic assessment of patients with infectious endocarditis: prediction of risk for complications.

    Anthony J. Sanfilippo;Michael H. Picard;John B. Newell;Emma Rosas

  • Reconsideration of echocardiographic standards for mitral valve prolapse: Lack of association between leaflet displacement isolated to the apical four chamber view and independent echocardiographic evidence of abnormality

    Robert A Levine;Evagelos Stathogiannis;John B Newell;Pamela Harrigan

  • Identification of High-Risk and Low-Risk Subgroups of Patients with Mitral-Valve Prolapse

    Andrew R. Marks;Christopher Y. Choong;Anthony J. Sanfilippo;Merry Ferré

  • Hydrodynamic compression of the right atrium: a new echocardiographic sign of cardiac tamponade.

    Linda Gillam;D. E. Guyer;T. C. Gibson;M. E. King

  • Inaccuracy of mitral pressure half-time immediately after percutaneous mitral valvotomy. Dependence on transmitral gradient and left atrial and ventricular compliance.

    J. D. Thomas;G. T. Wilkins;C. Y P Choong;V. M. Abascal

  • Percutaneous balloon dilatation ofthemitral valve: an analysis ofechocardiographic variables related to outcomeandthemechanism ofdilatation

    Gerard T Wilkins;Arthur E Weyman;Vivian M Abascal;Peter C Block

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert A. Levine
Robert A. Levine Harvard University
James D. Thomas
James D. Thomas Northwestern University
Michael H. Picard
Michael H. Picard Harvard University
Harvey Feigenbaum
Harvey Feigenbaum Indiana University
Igor F. Palacios
Igor F. Palacios Harvard University
Peter C. Block
Peter C. Block Emory University
William J. Stewart
William J. Stewart Cleveland Clinic
Ajit P. Yoganathan
Ajit P. Yoganathan Georgia Institute of Technology
Douglas L. Mann
Douglas L. Mann Washington University in St. Louis
Aaron L. Baggish
Aaron L. Baggish Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Medicine can open the door to a wide range of related fields and online educational opportunities. If you’re exploring alternative pathways or specialized healthcare roles, numerous flexible options are available.

For those interested in nursing, there are now lpn program no entrance exam offerings, which let you start your journey into nursing without the added stress of pre-admission tests. Advancement is also possible for registered nurses looking to enhance their credentials, thanks to flexible rn to np programs online that bridge the gap toward nurse practitioner roles.

Not everyone in healthcare works directly with patients. The demand for professionals with a healthcare administration degree is growing, offering roles in leadership, management, and operations within the medical sector. Additionally, those passionate about wellness and disease prevention can build a rewarding career through a bachelor's in nutrition online, preparing for roles in clinical nutrition, public health, or research.

These pathways provide dynamic career options for those looking to complement or expand their experience in Medicine, all while benefiting from the flexibility of accredited online programs.

Best Scientists Citing Arthur E. Weyman

Trending Scientists