World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
102
Citations
55238
World Ranking
7517
National Ranking
3923

Sanjiv Kaul publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sanjiv Kaul sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 471 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Sanjiv Kaul D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sanjiv Kaul sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sanjiv Kaul is affiliated with Oregon Health & Science University in the United States. Their research spans medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a focus on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, biomedical engineering, molecular biology, surgery, and endocrinology, diabetes, and metabolism.

Kaul's work encompasses several main topics, including ultrasound and hyperthermia applications, eicosanoids and hypertension pharmacology, thyroid and parathyroid surgery, parathyroid disorders and treatments, cardiac imaging and diagnostics, hormonal regulation and hypertension, and cardiovascular function and risk factors.

Recent publications by Kaul or involving their contributions include:

  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: the future of treatment, 2020, European Journal of Heart Failure
  • Control of coronary vascular resistance by eicosanoids via a novel GPCR, 2022, American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology
  • Mechanism and potential treatment of the "no reflow" phenomenon after acute myocardial infarction: role of pericytes and GPR39, 2021, American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology
  • FREQUENT GENE CONVERSION IN HUMAN EMBRYOS INDUCED BY DOUBLE STRAND BREAKS, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Risk of Cardiovascular Conditions in Patients with Chronic Hypoparathyroidism: A Retrospective Cohort Study, 2021, Advances in Therapy

Key frequent co-authors collaborating with Kaul include Carmen Methner, Nabil J. Alkayed, Zhiping Cao, Anthony P. Barnes, and Elvira O. Gosmanova.

Kaul has contributed frequently to several publication venues, with a notable number of publications appearing in Circulation, Journal of the American College of Cardiology, Advances in Therapy, Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, and Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis.

Best Publications

  • Standardized Myocardial Segmentation and Nomenclature for Tomographic Imaging of the Heart A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association

    Manuel D. Cerqueira;Neil J. Weissman;Vasken Dilsizian;Alice K. Jacobs

  • American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents.

    Gary S Mintz;Steven E Nissen;William D Anderson;Steven R Bailey

  • American College of Cardiology/European Society of Cardiology clinical expert consensus document on hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents and the European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines

    Barry J. Maron;William J. McKenna;Gordon K. Danielson;Lukas J. Kappenberger

  • Quantification of Myocardial Blood Flow With Ultrasound-Induced Destruction of Microbubbles Administered as a Constant Venous Infusion

    Kevin Wei;Ananda R. Jayaweera;Soroosh Firoozan;Andre Linka

  • American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association expert consensus document on electron-beam computed tomography for the diagnosis and prognosis of coronary artery disease

    Robert A O’Rourke;Bruce H Brundage;Victor F Froelicher;Philip Greenland

  • Correction of a pathogenic gene mutation in human embryos

    Hong Ma;Nuria Marti-Gutierrez;Sang Wook Park;Jun Wu

  • An Association Between Collateral Blood Flow and Myocardial Viability in Patients with Recent Myocardial Infarction

    P. J. Sabia;E. R. Powers;M. Ragosta;I. J. Sarembock

  • Quantitative planar rest-redistribution 201Tl imaging in detection of myocardial viability and prediction of improvement in left ventricular function after coronary bypass surgery in patients with severely depressed left ventricular function.

    Michael Ragosta;George A. Beller;Denny D. Watson;Sanjiv Kaul

  • Use of sildenafil (Viagra) in patients with cardiovascular disease

    Melvin D. Cheitlin;Adolph M. Hutter;Ralph G. Brindis

  • Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry for Quantification of Visceral Fat

    Sanjiv Kaul;Megan P. Rothney;Dawn M. Peters;Wynn K. Wacker

  • Direct In Vivo Visualization of Intravascular Destruction of Microbubbles by Ultrasound and its Local Effects on Tissue

    Danny M. Skyba;Richard J. Price;Andre Z. Linka;Thomas C. Skalak

  • Imaging Tumor Angiogenesis With Contrast Ultrasound and Microbubbles Targeted to αvβ3

    Dilantha B. Ellegala;Howard Leong-Poi;Joan E. Carpenter;Alexander L. Klibanov

  • Microvascular integrity indicates myocellular viability in patients with recent myocardial infarction. New insights using myocardial contrast echocardiography.

    M. Ragosta;G. Camarano;Sanjiv Kaul;E. R. Powers

  • Delivery of Colloidal Particles and Red Blood Cells to Tissue Through Microvessel Ruptures Created by Targeted Microbubble Destruction With Ultrasound

    Richard J. Price;Danny M. Skyba;Sanjiv Kaul;Thomas C. Skalak

  • Detection of Coronary Artery Disease With Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography Comparison With 99mTc-Sestamibi Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography

    Sanjiv Kaul;Roxy Senior;Howard Dittrich;Usha Raval

  • Coronary and myocardial blood volumes: noninvasive tools to assess the coronary microcirculation?

    S Kaul;A R Jayaweera

  • Noninvasive Assessment of Angiogenesis by Ultrasound and Microbubbles Targeted to αv-Integrins

    Howard Leong-Poi;Jonathan Christiansen;Alexander L. Klibanov;Sanjiv Kaul

  • American College of Cardiology/Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions Clinical Expert Consensus Document on cardiac catheterization laboratory standards. A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents.

    Thomas M Bashore;Eric R Bates;Peter B Berger;David A Clark

  • The behavior of sonicated albumin microbubbles within the microcirculation: a basis for their use during myocardial contrast echocardiography.

    M W Keller;S S Segal;S Kaul;B Duling

  • Correction of a pathogenic gene mutation in human embryos

    Ma H;Marti-Gutierrez N;Park Sw;Wu J

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan R. Lindner
Jonathan R. Lindner Oregon Health & Science University
Roxy Senior
Roxy Senior National Health Service
Alexander L. Klibanov
Alexander L. Klibanov University of Virginia
George A. Beller
George A. Beller University of Virginia
Robert D. Abbott
Robert D. Abbott University of Virginia
Judith S. Hochman
Judith S. Hochman New York University
Pamela S. Douglas
Pamela S. Douglas Duke University
Shoukhrat Mitalipov
Shoukhrat Mitalipov Oregon Health & Science University
Alice K. Jacobs
Alice K. Jacobs Boston University
Neil J. Weissman
Neil J. Weissman MedStar Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those exploring alternative pathways or seeking to expand their qualifications in healthcare, numerous online degree options are available. Many professionals pursue bsn to np programs online to become advanced practice nurses, which can open doors to clinical and leadership roles in mental health.

If you’re interested in healthcare administration, earning an online health management degree is a flexible way to prepare for management positions in hospitals, clinics, or other medical organizations. Affordability is a key consideration, and options like the cheapest mha programs allow students to advance their careers without taking on unnecessary debt.

For nurses looking to reach the highest levels of clinical practice, there are cheap online dnp programs designed for working professionals. These programs support skill development and career advancement while offering the flexibility of online study.

Exploring these online degree options can provide valuable alternatives or complements to traditional medical education, expanding your career possibilities in the fast-changing healthcare field.

Best Scientists Citing Sanjiv Kaul

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles