World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
25990
World Ranking
17458
National Ranking
8741

Keith G. Lurie publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith G. Lurie sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 412 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Keith G. Lurie D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Keith G. Lurie sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Keith G. Lurie is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a significant contribution to emergency medicine and related subfields.

The scientist has contributed extensively in several domains within medicine, including emergency medicine, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, neurology, biomedical engineering, and surgery. Their body of work covers topics such as cardiac arrest and resuscitation, respiratory support and mechanisms, traumatic brain injury and neurovascular disturbances, mechanical circulatory support devices, trauma management and diagnosis, traumatic brain injury research, and trauma and emergency care studies.

Frequent publication venues for Keith G. Lurie's research include:

  • Circulation
  • Resuscitation
  • Critical Care Medicine
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Annals of Emergency Medicine

Among recent papers authored with collaboration from other researchers are:

  • Electrocardiographic Diagnosis of Acute Coronary Occlusion Myocardial Infarction in Ventricular Paced Rhythm Using the Modified Sgarbossa Criteria, 2021, Annals of Emergency Medicine
  • Controlled sequential elevation of the head and thorax combined with active compression decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation and an impedance threshold device improves neurological survival in a porcine model of cardiac arrest, 2020, Resuscitation
  • Rapidly scalable mechanical ventilator for the COVID-19 pandemic, 2020, Intensive Care Medicine
  • Head and thorax elevation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation using circulatory adjuncts is associated with improved survival, 2022, Resuscitation
  • Effect of controlled sequential elevation timing of the head and thorax during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on cerebral perfusion pressures in a porcine model of cardiac arrest, 2020, Resuscitation

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Keith G. Lurie include Johanna Moore, Guillaume Debaty, Bayert Salverda, Anja Metzger, and José Labarère.

Best Publications

  • Decreased catecholamine sensitivity and beta-adrenergic-receptor density in failing human hearts.

    Bristow Mr;Ginsburg R;Minobe W;Cubicciotti Rs

  • Hyperventilation-Induced Hypotension During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

    Tom P. Aufderheide;Gardar Sigurdsson;Ronald G. Pirrallo;Demetris Yannopoulos

  • Evaluation of Different Ventricular Pacing Sites in Patients With Severe Heart Failure Results of an Acute Hemodynamic Study

    Jean Jacques Blanc;Yves Etienne;Martine Gilard;Jacques Mansourati

  • Death by hyperventilation: a common and life-threatening problem during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

    Tom P. Aufderheide;Keith G. Lurie

  • Randomised comparison of epinephrine and vasopressin in patients with out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation

    Karl H. Lindner;Burkhard Dirks;Hans Ulrich Strohmenger;Andreas W. Prengel

  • Effects of incomplete chest wall decompression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on coronary and cerebral perfusion pressures in a porcine model of cardiac arrest

    Demetris Yannopoulos;Scott McKnite;Tom P. Aufderheide;Gardar Sigurdsson

  • Vasopressin Improves Vital Organ Blood Flow During Closed-Chest Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation in Pigs

    Karl H. Lindner;Andreas W. Prengel;Ernst G. Pfenninger;Ingrid M. Lindner

  • Regional Systems of Care for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest A Policy Statement From the American Heart Association

    Graham Nichol;Tom P. Aufderheide;Brian Eigel;Robert W. Neumar

  • Curative percutaneous catheter ablation using radiofrequency energy for accessory pathways in all locations : results in 100 consecutive patients

    Michael D. Lesh;George F. Van Hare;David J. Schamp;Walter Chien

  • Active Compression-Decompression: A New Method of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

    Todd J. Cohen;Todd J. Cohen;Kelly J. Tucker;Keith G. Lurie;Rita F. Redberg

  • Coronary sinus catheter

    Keith G. Lurie;David G. Benditt;Jeffrey J. Shultz;John David Ockuly

  • Importance and Implementation of Training in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Automated External Defibrillation in Schools A Science Advisory From the American Heart Association

    Diana M. Cave;Tom P. Aufderheide;Jeffrey Beeson;Alison Ellison

  • Methods for treating a patient suffering from shock

    Lurie Keith G;Zielinski Todd M

  • Standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation with augmentation of negative intrathoracic pressure for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomised trial

    Tom P Aufderheide;Ralph J Frascone;Marvin A Wayne;Brian D Mahoney

  • Incomplete chest wall decompression: a clinical evaluation of CPR performance by EMS personnel and assessment of alternative manual chest compression-decompression techniques.

    Tom P. Aufderheide;Ronald G. Pirrallo;Demetris Yannopoulos;John P. Klein

  • Vasopressin administration in refractory cardiac arrest

    Karl H. Lindner;Andreas W. Prengel;Alexander Brinkmann;Hans Ulrich Strohmenger

  • Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Out-of-Hospital Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation Cardiac Arrest

    Demetris Yannopoulos;Jason A. Bartos;Ganesh Raveendran;Marc Conterato

  • A Comparison of Standard Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Active Compression–Decompression Resuscitation for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

    Patrick Plaisance;Keith G. Lurie;Eric Vicaut;Frederic Adnet

  • Improving Active Compression-Decompression Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation With an Inspiratory Impedance Valve

    Keith G. Lurie;Paul Coffeen;Jeffrey Shultz;Scott McKnite

  • Comparison of Standard Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Versus the Combination of Active Compression-Decompression Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and an Inspiratory Impedance Threshold Device for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

    Benno B. Wolcke;Dietmar K. Mauer;Mark F. Schoefmann;Heinke Teichmann

Frequent Co-Authors

David G. Benditt
David G. Benditt University of Minnesota
Tom P. Aufderheide
Tom P. Aufderheide Medical College of Wisconsin
Victor A. Convertino
Victor A. Convertino United States Department of the Army
Ahamed H. Idris
Ahamed H. Idris The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Vinay M. Nadkarni
Vinay M. Nadkarni Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Melvin M. Scheinman
Melvin M. Scheinman University of California, San Francisco
Henry R. Halperin
Henry R. Halperin Johns Hopkins University
John P. Klein
John P. Klein Medical College of Wisconsin
Eric Vicaut
Eric Vicaut Université Paris Cité
Frank S. Bates
Frank S. Bates University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medical careers in the USA today offers more flexible study options than ever before. Many online nursing programs let you advance your education while staying on the job. For example, registered nurses interested in completing their bachelor’s degree can benefit from rn to bsn no clinical hours programs, which reduce time commitments and allow for more self-paced learning.

If you’re looking to advance your nursing education further, consider programs like the shortest dnp programs, which are designed for speed and convenience. There are even online dnp programs without dissertation requirements, streamlining the academic workload for busy professionals focused on clinical leadership roles.

For those who want to enter the nursing profession quickly, the fast track lpn programs online provide a faster pathway to licensure and employment. Whether you’re pursuing entry-level nursing or an advanced degree, online options offer increased accessibility, flexibility, and the ability to align education with your career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Keith G. Lurie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles