World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
97
Citations
31052
World Ranking
9376
National Ranking
4834

Max Harry Weil publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Max Harry Weil sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 785 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Max Harry Weil D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Max Harry Weil sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Max Harry Weil was affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their career included contributions to academic research, although detailed information about specific research papers, coauthors, or publication venues is not available.

There are no records of specific fields or subfields of study, topics of work, or book publications attributed to Weil. Additionally, no awards or notable recognitions have been documented in the available data.

This profile reflects the limited publicly available information on Weil's academic output and collaborations. Weil is deceased.

Best Publications

  • Experimental and Clinical Studies on Lactate and Pyruvate as Indicators of the Severity of Acute Circulatory Failure (Shock)

    Max Harry Weil;Abdelmonen A. Afifi

  • Rapid enzymatic measurement of blood lactate and pyruvate. Use and significance of metaphosphoric acid as a common precipitant.

    Edward P. Marbach;Max Harry Weil

  • Difference in Acid-Base State Between Venous and Arterial Blood During Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

    M. H. Weil;E. C. Rackow;R. Trevino;W. Grundler

  • Adverse outcomes of interrupted precordial compression during automated defibrillation

    Ting Yu;Max Harry Weil;Wanchun Tang;Shijie Sun

  • Excess Lactate: An Index of Reversibility of Shock in Human Patients

    George Broder;Max H. Weil

  • Epinephrine Increases the Severity of Postresuscitation Myocardial Dysfunction

    Wanchun Tang;Max Harry Weil;Shijie Sun;Marko Noc

  • Fluid challenge revisited.

    Jean Louis Vincent;Max Harry Weil

  • Cardiac output and end-tidal carbon dioxide

    Max Harry Weil;Jose Bisera;Robert P. Trevino;Eric C. Rackow

  • Expired carbon dioxide: a noninvasive monitor of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

    C V Gudipati;M H Weil;J Bisera;H G Deshmukh

  • High-Energy Defibrillation Increases the Severity of Postresuscitation Myocardial Dysfunction

    Jianlin Xie;Max Harry Weil;Shijie Sun;Wanchun Tang

  • Utstein-Style Guidelines for Uniform Reporting of Laboratory CPR Research

    Ahamed H. Idris;Lance B. Becker;Joseph P. Ornato;Jerris R. Hedges

  • Sublingual capnometry: a new noninvasive measurement for diagnosis and quantitation of severity of circulatory shock.

    Max Harry Weil;Yoshihide Nakagawa;Wanchun Tang;Yoji Sato

  • CARDIAC ARREST IN THE CRITICALLY ILL. I. A STUDY OF PREDISPOSING CAUSES IN 132 PATIENTS

    S. J. Camarata;M. H. Weil;P. K. Hanashiro;H. Shubin

  • The effects of biphasic and conventional monophasic defibrillation on postresuscitation myocardial function

    Wanchun Tang;Max Harry Weil;Shijie Sun;Hitoshi Yamaguchi

  • Adverse effects of interrupting precordial compression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

    Yoji Sato;Max Harry Weil;Shijie Sun;Wanchun Tang

  • Oxygen delivery and consumption in patients with hyperdynamic septic shock.

    Mark E. Astiz;Eric C. Rackow;Jay L. Falk;Brian S. Kaufman

  • Cardiac arrest in the critically III: II. Hyperosmolal states following cardiac arrest

    João A. Máttar;Max Harry Weil;Herbert Shubin;Leon Stein

  • Arteriovenous carbon dioxide and pH gradients during cardiac arrest.

    W G Grundler;M H Weil;E C Rackow

  • TEMPERATURE OF THE GREAT TOE AS AN INDICATION OF THE SEVERITY OF SHOCK

    H. R. Joly;M. H. Weil

  • Mechanical ventilation may not be essential for initial cardiopulmonary resuscitation

    M Noc;MH Weil;W Tang;T Turner

Frequent Co-Authors

Jean Louis Vincent
Jean Louis Vincent Université Libre de Bruxelles
Myron L. Weisfeldt
Myron L. Weisfeldt Johns Hopkins University
Graham Nichol
Graham Nichol University of Washington
William C. Shoemaker
William C. Shoemaker University of Southern California
Karl B. Kern
Karl B. Kern University of Arizona
Peter Safar
Peter Safar University of Pittsburgh
Joseph P. Ornato
Joseph P. Ornato Virginia Commonwealth University
Francesco Cappello
Francesco Cappello University of Palermo
Mark W. Kroll
Mark W. Kroll University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring a career in medicine, there are flexible online programs that could help you advance quickly and conveniently. For registered nurses looking to further their nursing careers without the traditional in-person requirements, rn bsn online programs no clinicals offer a pathway to a bachelor’s degree while balancing work and family commitments.

Nurses seeking the highest level of clinical education might consider accelerated dnp programs, which allow motivated students to complete their Doctor of Nursing Practice in a shorter timeframe. Additionally, online dnp programs without clinicals provide an alternative for experienced nurses who wish to advance without additional clinical hours.

For those starting in the field, fast track lpn programs online offer an efficient entry into practical nursing, making it possible to start working sooner. Each pathway has its unique benefits and challenges, so it’s important to align your choice with your career goals, learning style, and life circumstances.

Best Scientists Citing Max Harry Weil

Recently Published Articles