World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
78
Citations
28882
World Ranking
17872
National Ranking
8915

David G. Benditt publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David G. Benditt sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 562 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David G. Benditt D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David G. Benditt sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

David G. Benditt is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States and has a significant body of work primarily in the field of Medicine. Their research spans various subfields, including Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Neurology, Psychiatry and Mental Health, and Physiology.

Their main research topics encompass Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders, Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control, Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments, Cardiac Electrophysiology and Arrhythmias, Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes, Cardiac Pacing and Defibrillation Studies, and Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders.

David G. Benditt has published extensively in several key journals. Frequent venues for their publications include:

  • Circulation
  • Heart Rhythm
  • European Heart Journal
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Journal of the American Heart Association

Their collaborative work involves multiple co-authors, with frequent collaborations including:

  • Richard Sutton
  • J. Gert van Dijk
  • Roland D. Thijs
  • Brian Olshansky
  • Artur Fedorowski

Some of the recent papers by David G. Benditt include:

  • Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome (POTS): A critical assessment, 2020, Progress in Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Tilt testing remains a valuable asset, 2021, European Heart Journal
  • Novel Methods for Quantification of Vasodepression and Cardioinhibition During Tilt-Induced Vasovagal Syncope, 2020, Circulation Research
  • Mast Cell Activation Disorder and Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome: A Clinical Association, 2021, Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Sinus Tachycardia: a Multidisciplinary Expert Focused Review, 2022, Circulation Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology

Best Publications

  • Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypotension, neurally mediated syncope and the postural tachycardia syndrome.

    Roy Freeman;Wouter Wieling;Felicia B. Axelrod;David G. Benditt

  • Consensus statement on the definition of orthostatic hypotension, neurally mediated syncope and the postural tachycardia syndrome

    Roy Freeman;Wouter Wieling;Felicia B. Axelrod;David G. Benditt

  • Guidelines on management (diagnosis and treatment) of syncope

    Michele Brignole;P. Alboni;D. Benditt;L. Bergfeldt

  • Evaluation of Different Ventricular Pacing Sites in Patients With Severe Heart Failure Results of an Acute Hemodynamic Study

    Jean Jacques Blanc;Yves Etienne;Martine Gilard;Jacques Mansourati

  • Provocation of bradycardia and hypotension by isoproterenol and upright posture in patients with unexplained syncope.

    Adrian Almquist;Irvin F. Goldenberg;Simon Milstein;Meng Yang Chen

  • 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines, and the Heart Rhythm Society

    Win Kuang Shen;Robert S. Sheldon;David G. Benditt;Mitchell I. Cohen

  • Guidelines on management (diagnosis and treatment) of syncope-update 2004. Executive Summary.

    Michele Brignole;Paolo Alboni;David G. Benditt;Lennart Bergfeldt

  • Guidelines on management (diagnosis and treatment) of syncope--update 2004.

    Paolo Alboni;David G. Benditt;Lennart Bergfeldt;Jean-Jacques Blanc

  • Tilt table testing for assessing syncope

    David G. Benditt;David W. Ferguson;Blair P. Grubb;Wishwa N. Kapoor

  • Early application of an implantable loop recorder allows effective specific therapy in patients with recurrent suspected neurally mediated syncope

    Michele Brignole;Richard Sutton;Carlo Menozzi;Roberto Garcia-Civera

  • Effects of incomplete chest wall decompression during cardiopulmonary resuscitation on coronary and cerebral perfusion pressures in a porcine model of cardiac arrest

    Demetris Yannopoulos;Scott McKnite;Tom P. Aufderheide;Gardar Sigurdsson

  • Coronary sinus catheter

    Keith G. Lurie;David G. Benditt;Jeffrey J. Shultz;John David Ockuly

  • Sudden death in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators: The importance of post-shock electromechanical dissociation

    L.Brent Mitchell;Edgar A Pineda;Jack L Titus;Paulette M Bartosch

  • Symptoms and signs of syncope: a review of the link between physiology and clinical clues

    Wouter Wieling;Roland D. Thijs;N. van Dijk;Arthur A. M. Wilde

  • Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Out-of-Hospital Refractory Ventricular Fibrillation Cardiac Arrest

    Demetris Yannopoulos;Jason A. Bartos;Ganesh Raveendran;Marc Conterato

  • Does Microvolt T-Wave Alternans Testing Predict Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy and Prophylactic Defibrillators?: The MASTER (Microvolt T Wave Alternans Testing for Risk Stratification of Post-Myocardial Infarction Patients) Trial

    Theodore Chow;Dean J. Kereiakes;John Onufer;Alan Woelfel

  • Guidelines on management (diagnosis and treatment) of syncope—update 2004

    M. Brignole;P. Alboni;D.G. Benditt

  • Personal and public safety issues related to arrhythmias that may affect consciousness: implications for regulation and physician recommendations. A medical/scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the North American Society of Pacing and Electrophysiology.

    Epstein Ae;Miles Wm;Benditt Dg;Camm Aj

  • Calcium uptake by cardiac sarcoplasmic reticulum in human dilated cardiomyopathy.

    Constantinos J. Limas;Maria Teresa Olivari;Irvin F Goldenberg;T. Barry Levine

  • Usefulness of disopyramide for prevention of upright tilt-induced hypotension-bradycardia

    Simón Milstein;Jeffrey Buetikofer;Ann Dunnigan;David G. Benditt

Frequent Co-Authors

Keith G. Lurie
Keith G. Lurie University of Minnesota
Michele Brignole
Michele Brignole University of Wisconsin–Madison
Wouter Wieling
Wouter Wieling University of Amsterdam
D. Woodrow Benson
D. Woodrow Benson Medical College of Wisconsin
J. Gert van Dijk
J. Gert van Dijk Leiden University
Roland D. Thijs
Roland D. Thijs Leiden University
Rose Anne Kenny
Rose Anne Kenny Trinity College Dublin
Win Kuang Shen
Win Kuang Shen Mayo Clinic
Melvin M. Scheinman
Melvin M. Scheinman University of California, San Francisco
Andrew D. Krahn
Andrew D. Krahn University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in a medical career but want flexible study options, there are several accredited online pathways. Nursing is a popular field with a variety of options. For those aiming to advance their expertise and leadership positions in healthcare, pursuing an online PhD nursing program is an excellent choice. These programs cater to experienced nurses looking to impact practice, policy, or education.

For registered nurses wanting to earn a bachelor’s degree, the cheapest rn to bsn program online can fast-track your career advancement without breaking the bank. There are also pathways for students with a non-nursing bachelor’s degree. The non nursing bachelor's to msn online pathway provides a direct route to a master’s degree in nursing, opening doors to advanced clinical roles.

If you're just getting started, consider some of the most accessible adn programs. Completing an associate degree in nursing allows you to begin practicing quickly and build your foundation toward further studies and credentials.

Best Scientists Citing David G. Benditt

Trending Scientists