World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Win Kuang Shen

Win Kuang Shen

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
86
Citations
40381
World Ranking
13881
National Ranking
7048

Win Kuang Shen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Win Kuang Shen sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 375 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Win Kuang Shen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Win Kuang Shen sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Win Kuang Shen is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and has produced extensive research primarily in the field of Medicine, with a focus on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their body of work includes 41 publications in medicine, with a significant emphasis on cardiology subfields such as cardiac arrhythmias and treatments and cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies.

The main topics covered in Shen's research include:

  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Cardiovascular Syncope and Autonomic Disorders
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments

Shen has collaborated frequently with several coauthors, the most common being:

  • Komandoor Srivathsan (9 publications)
  • Dan Sorajja (8 publications)
  • Hicham El Masry (5 publications)
  • Luis R. Scott (4 publications)
  • Justin Z. Lee (4 publications)

Their research has been published in multiple venues, with Circulation being the most frequent, hosting eight of their works. Other venues include:

  • JACC. Clinical Electrophysiology (2 publications)
  • International Journal of Cardiology (2 publications)
  • Journal of the American Heart Association (1 publication)
  • Journal of Clinical Hypertension (1 publication)

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Shen highlight a range of cardiological issues:

  • Guidance on Short-Term Management of Atrial Fibrillation in Coronavirus Disease 2019, 2020, Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Causes of Early Mortality After Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation in Patients With Reduced Ejection Fraction, 2022, JACC. Clinical Electrophysiology
  • Syncope in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy (Part II): An Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Management, 2022, International Journal of Cardiology
  • Impact of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field Therapy on Vascular Function and Blood Pressure in Hypertensive Individuals, 2020, Journal of Clinical Hypertension
  • Surviving Sudden Cardiac Arrest-Successes, Challenges, and Opportunities, 2021, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology

Best Publications

  • 2013 ACC/AHA Guideline on the Treatment of Blood Cholesterol to Reduce Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Risk in Adults A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines

    Neil J Stone;Jennifer G Robinson;Alice H. Lichtenstein;C Noel Bairey Merz

  • Efficacy of Implantable Cardioverter–Defibrillators for the Prevention of Sudden Death in Patients with Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

    Barry J. Maron;Win Kuang Shen;Mark S. Link;Andrew E. Epstein

  • 2014 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines

    Rick A. Nishimura;Catherine M. Otto;Robert O. Bonow;Blase A. Carabello

  • Epidemiology and natural history of atrial fibrillation: clinical implications.

    Sumeet S. Chugh;Joseph L. Blackshear;Win Kuang Shen;Stephen C. Hammill

  • Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and prevention of sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

    Barry J. Maron;Paolo Spirito;Win Kuang Shen;Tammy S. Haas

  • 2017 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Syncope: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines, and the Heart Rhythm Society

    Win Kuang Shen;Robert S. Sheldon;David G. Benditt;Mitchell I. Cohen

  • 2015 ACC/AHA/HRS guideline for the management of adult patients with supraventricular tachycardia A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society

    Richard L. Page;José A. Joglar;Mary A. Caldwell;Hugh Calkins

  • Management of patients with peripheral artery disease (compilation of 2005 and 2011 ACCF/AHA Guideline Recommendations): a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

    Jeffrey L. Anderson;Jonathan L. Halperin;Nancy M. Albert;Biykem Bozkurt

  • 2015 Heart Rhythm Society Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Postural Tachycardia Syndrome, Inappropriate Sinus Tachycardia, and Vasovagal Syncope

    Robert S. Sheldon;Blair P. Grubb;Brian Olshansky;Win Kuang Shen

  • Population-based study of the incidence of sudden unexplained death in epilepsy

    David M. Ficker;E. L. So;W. K. Shen;J. F. Annegers

  • Long-Term Progression and Outcomes With Aging in Patients With Lone Atrial Fibrillation A 30-Year Follow-Up Study

    Arshad Jahangir;Victor Lee;Paul A. Friedman;Jane M. Trusty

  • Postural Orthostatic Tachycardia Syndrome: The Mayo Clinic Experience

    Mark J. Thieben;Paola Sandroni;David M. Sletten;Lisa M. Benrud-Larson

  • Long-term outcomes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest after successful early defibrillation.

    T. Jared Bunch;Roger D. White;Bernard J. Gersh;Ryan A. Meverden

  • Prevalence and triggers of syncope in medical students.

    Karin S. Ganzeboom;Nancy Colman;Johannes B. Reitsma;Win K. Shen

  • Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (Compilation of 2006 ACCF/AHA/ESC and 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS Recommendations) A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines

    Jeffrey L. Anderson;Jonathan L. Halperin;Nancy M. Albert;Biykem Bozkurt

  • Familial atrial fibrillation is a genetically heterogeneous disorder

    Dawood Darbar;Kathleen J. Herron;Jeffrey D. Ballew;Arshad Jahangir

  • Long-Term Survival after Ablation of the Atrioventricular Node and Implantation of a Permanent Pacemaker in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

    Cevher Ozcan;Arshad Jahangir;Paul A. Friedman;Philip J. Patel

  • 2017 HRS expert consensus statement on magnetic resonance imaging and radiation exposure in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices

    Julia H. Indik;J. Rod Gimbel;Haruhiko Abe;Ricardo Alkmim-Teixeira

  • Syncope Evaluation in the Emergency Department Study (SEEDS) A Multidisciplinary Approach to Syncope Management

    Win K. Shen;Wyatt W. Decker;Peter A. Smars;Deepi G. Goyal

  • Practical Instructions for the 2018 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope

    Michele Brignole;Angel Moya;Frederik J de Lange;Jean-Claude Deharo

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul A. Friedman
Paul A. Friedman Mayo Clinic
David O. Hodge
David O. Hodge Mayo Clinic
Bernard J. Gersh
Bernard J. Gersh Mayo Clinic
David L. Hayes
David L. Hayes Mayo Clinic
Phillip A. Low
Phillip A. Low Mayo Clinic
Andre Terzic
Andre Terzic Mayo Clinic
Wouter Wieling
Wouter Wieling University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Medicine opens up numerous professional avenues, especially with the increased availability and flexibility of online programs. If you’re looking for a faster route to clinical practice, nursing is a popular and versatile choice. Entry-level students, as well as working nurses, can benefit from online nursing programs that are designed to be both flexible and accessible.

For registered nurses aiming to advance their qualifications, the rn to bsn online cost is a pivotal consideration. These bridge programs allow RNs to earn their bachelor’s degree efficiently, often at a lower tuition rate than traditional on-campus options.

Those aspiring to become advanced practice providers might explore the most affordable nurse practitioner programs. Becoming a nurse practitioner offers both autonomy and expanded clinical responsibilities. Meanwhile, nurses interested in leadership, research, or academia can consider pursuing online phd programs nursing to reach the highest levels of the profession.

Whether you are starting your healthcare journey or seeking advanced credentials, affordable online degrees provide a convenient pathway to achieving your career goals in Medicine.

Best Scientists Citing Win Kuang Shen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles