World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 78 18023 16942 8984 8305 512 22990

Natesa G. Pandian publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Natesa G. Pandian between 1980 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Natesa G. Pandian published across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025, averaging 11.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 1995. 3 of the 517 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 1995. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 4 publications 1982: 6 publications 1983: 8 publications 1984: 9 publications 1985: 7 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 9 publications 1989: 11 publications 1990: 16 publications 1991: 22 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 11 publications 1994: 20 publications 1995: 36 publications 1996: 21 publications 1997: 19 publications 1998: 26 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 18 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 19 publications 2003: 11 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 14 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 17 publications 2014: 27 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 6 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 5 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
1980 2025

517 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Natesa G. Pandian: publications per year, 1980 to 2025
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 4
1982 6
1983 8
1984 9
1985 7
1986 6
1987 6
1988 9
1989 11
1990 16
1991 22
1992 8
1993 11
1994 20
1995 36
1996 21
1997 19
1998 26
1999 12
2000 18
2001 13
2002 19
2003 11
2004 11
2005 14
2006 18
2007 5
2008 14
2009 17
2010 16
2011 8
2012 9
2013 17
2014 27
2015 13
2016 3
2017 4
2018 2
2019 4
2020 1
2021 6
2022 1
2023 5
2024 2
2025 1
Total 517
Download as CSV

Natesa G. Pandian publications per year - data summary

  • Natesa G. Pandian, a Medicine scholar from Tufts Medical Center, has 517 publications recorded across 46 years, from 1980 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1980 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 1995, with 36 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1980, 2020, 2022 and 2025, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 11.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 11.2 per year counting only the 46 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 15 publications, 3% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1980-1995: 180 publications (11.3 per year); 1996-2011: 242 publications (15.1 per year); 2012-2025: 95 publications (6.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is declining.

Natesa G. Pandian publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natesa G. Pandian sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 501–520 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 512 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617 512
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Natesa G. Pandian publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Natesa G. Pandian, a Medicine scholar from Tufts Medical Center, records 512 publications - the 60th percentile of the discipline.
  • 60% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Natesa G. Pandian, and about 40% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Natesa G. Pandian ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Natesa G. Pandian D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Natesa G. Pandian sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891 78
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Natesa G. Pandian D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Natesa G. Pandian, a Medicine scholar from Tufts Medical Center, records 78 D-Index - the 12th percentile of the discipline.
  • 12% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Natesa G. Pandian, and about 88% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Natesa G. Pandian ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Natesa G. Pandian is affiliated with Tufts Medical Center in the United States and conducts research primarily at the intersection of computer science and medicine. Their work spans computer science applications, artificial intelligence, health information management, information systems, and surgery.

Their published research includes studies related to artificial intelligence in healthcare, with a focus on cancer detection and diagnostic systems. Specific topics covered in their work include:

  • AI in cancer detection
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • Educational Technology and Assessment
  • Hip disorders and treatments
  • Musculoskeletal Disorders and Rehabilitation
  • Sports injuries and prevention

Natesa G. Pandian has contributed to several peer-reviewed journals. Frequent venues for their publications include:

  • Iraqi Journal for Computer Science and Mathematics
  • International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence
  • International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications
  • Sudanese Journal of Paediatrics

Coauthors often collaborating with Natesa G. Pandian include:

  • D. Shanthi
  • N Selvaganesh
  • K. Deepika
  • M Sowjanya Reddy

The following are examples of their research publications, including full titles, publication years, and venues:

  • Hybrid Deep Learning-Based Automatic Diagnosis of Breast Cancer from Mammograms Using Segmentation and Feature Selection, 2025, International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence
  • A Novel Biased Probability Neural Network (BPNN) and Regularized Extreme Learning Machine (RELM) based Hearing Loss Prediction System, 2023, Iraqi Journal for Computer Science and Mathematics
  • An Articulate Heart Attack Detection System Using Mine Blast Optimization (MBO) Based Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network (MLPNN) Model, 2023, Iraqi Journal for Computer Science and Mathematics
  • Analysis of performance of accuracy by adding new features individually using Relief-F and Budget Tree Random Forest (RFBTRF) method, 2022, International Journal of Nonlinear Analysis and Applications
  • Pubic symphysitis of enthesitis related arthritis mimicking urinary tract infection in a young boy, 2024, Sudanese Journal of Paediatrics

Best Publications

  • EAE/ASE Recommendations for Image Acquisition and Display Using Three-Dimensional Echocardiography

    Roberto M. Lang;Luigi P. Badano;Wendy Tsang;David H. Adams

  • Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Is Predominantly a Disease of Left Ventricular Outflow Tract Obstruction

    Martin S. Maron;Iacopo Olivotto;Andrey G. Zenovich;Mark S. Link

  • Assessment of peripheral vascular endothelial function with finger arterial pulse wave amplitude

    Jeffrey T Kuvin;Ayan R Patel;Kathleen A Sliney;Natesa G Pandian

  • Revision of the Jones Criteria for the Diagnosis of Acute Rheumatic Fever in the Era of Doppler Echocardiography A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

    Michael H. Gewitz;Robert S. Baltimore;Lloyd Y. Tani;Craig A. Sable

  • Predicting recovery of severe regional ventricular dysfunction. Comparison of resting scintigraphy with 201Tl and 99mTc-sestamibi.

    J E Udelson;P S Coleman;J Metherall;N G Pandian

  • Morphological and Functional Characteristics of Patent Foramen Ovale and Their Embolic Implications

    Stefano De Castro;Domenico Cartoni;Marco Fiorelli;Maurizia Rasura

  • An experimental model of sudden death due to low-energy chest-wall impact (commotio cordis)

    Mark S. Link;Paul J. Wang;Natesa G. Pandian;Saroja Bharati

  • Effects of levosimendan on systemic and regional hemodynamics in septic myocardial depression.

    Andrea Morelli;Stefano De Castro;Jean-Louis Teboul;Mervyn Singer

  • Peripheral vascular endothelial function testing as a noninvasive indicator of coronary artery disease

    Jeffrey T Kuvin;Ayan R Patel;Kathleen A Sliney;Natesa G Pandian

  • Ultrasound angioscopy: real-time, two-dimensional, intraluminal ultrasound imaging of blood vessels.

    Natesa G. Pandian;Natesa G. Pandian;Andreas Kreis;Andreas Kreis;Barbara Brockway;Barbara Brockway;Jeffrey M. Isner;Jeffrey M. Isner

  • A novel mechanism for the beneficial vascular effects of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol: enhanced vasorelaxation and increased endothelial nitric oxide synthase expression.

    Jeffrey T. Kuvin;Maria E. Rämet;Ayan R. Patel;Natesa G. Pandian

  • Contrast echocardiography in acute myocardial ischemia: I. In vivo determination of total left ventricular "area at risk".

    Sanjiv Kaul;Natesa G. Pandian;Robert D. Okada;Gerald M. Pohost

  • Ventricular remodeling in a mouse model of myocardial infarction

    Richard D. Patten;Mark J. Aronovitz;Luz Deras-Mejia;Natesa G. Pandian

  • Variable effects of changes in flow rate through the aortic, pulmonary and mitral valves on valve area and flow velocity: impact on quantitative Doppler flow calculations.

    William J. Stewart;Leng Jiang;Robert Mich;Natesa Pandian

  • Heterogeneity of left ventricular segmental wall thickening and excursion in 2-dimensional echocardiograms of normal human subjects

    Natesa G. Pandian;David J. Skorton;Steve M. Collins;Herman L. Falsetti

  • Three-dimensional reconstruction of intracoronary ultrasound images. Rationale, approaches, problems, and directions.

    J. R. T. C. Roelandt;C. Di Mario;N. G. Pandian;Li Wenguang

  • Mechanically Unloading the Left Ventricle Before Coronary Reperfusion Reduces Left Ventricular Wall Stress and Myocardial Infarct Size

    Navin K. Kapur;Vikram Paruchuri;Jose Angel Urbano-Morales;Emily E. Mackey

  • Dynamic three-dimensional echocardiography: methods and clinical potential.

    Natesa G. Pandian;Jos Roelandt;Navin C. Nanda;Lissa Sugeng

  • Investigation of global and regional myocardial mechanics with 3-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography and relations to hypertrophy and fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

    Jose Angel Urbano-Moral;Ethan J. Rowin;Martin S. Maron;Andrew Crean

  • Reversible Cardiomyopathy Associated with Cocaine Intoxication

    Saurabh K. Chokshi;Richard Moore;Natesa G. Pandian;Jeffrey M. Isner

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard E. Kerber
Richard E. Kerber University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics
Richard H. Karas
Richard H. Karas Tufts University
Siew Yen Ho
Siew Yen Ho Imperial College London
Marvin A. Konstam
Marvin A. Konstam Tufts Medical Center
Martin S. Maron
Martin S. Maron Tufts University
Itzhak Kronzon
Itzhak Kronzon Lenox Hill Hospital
James E. Udelson
James E. Udelson Tufts Medical Center
Mark S. Link
Mark S. Link The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Antonio Pelliccia
Antonio Pelliccia Italian National Olympic Committee
Paul J. Wang
Paul J. Wang Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Medicine in the USA isn’t your only pathway to a rewarding career in healthcare. Today, numerous online programs make it easier to earn related degrees and expand your career options—all while balancing current work or family commitments.

For those interested in mental health, online pmhnp programs prepare you to become a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner. These programs are designed for working nurses seeking to specialize without an on-campus commitment.

If affordability is a top concern, you can consider the cheapest online health science degree options. These degrees offer a strong foundation in healthcare and can lead to entry-level roles or further studies.

For those aiming for leadership positions, affordable online mha programs equip graduates with the management and policy skills needed in healthcare administration.

Advanced practice nurses may benefit from the cheapest dnp programs online. The Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) is a top credential for nurses seeking clinical expertise and leadership roles.

Best Scientists Citing Natesa G. Pandian

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles