World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
98
Citations
47101
World Ranking
8781
National Ranking
344

Jos R.T.C. Roelandt publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jos R.T.C. Roelandt sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 676 publications — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jos R.T.C. Roelandt D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jos R.T.C. Roelandt sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jos R.T.C. Roelandt was affiliated with Erasmus University Rotterdam in the Netherlands during their career. Their work spanned various aspects of academic research, though specific details about research topics, publications, and co-authors appear to be limited.

No recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues were documented, which leaves few direct insights into their ongoing research collaborations or publication patterns.

Similarly, there is no available information regarding book publications, fields of study, subfields, or main topics of their work. This lack of detailed data on subject matter focus or scholarly output suggests either an incomplete record or limited public data on these aspects of their academic profile.

There are no recorded awards or recognitions listed for Jos R.T.C. Roelandt, and no specific years of honors are noted.

Best Publications

  • Myocardial infarction redefined--a consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction.

    Elliott Antman;Jean-Pierre Bassand;Werner Klein;Magnus Ohman

  • Myocardial infarction redefined - A consensus document of the Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction

    J. S. Alpert;E. Antman;F. Apple;P. W. Armstrong

  • The effect of bisoprolol on perioperative mortality and myocardial infarction in high-risk patients undergoing vascular surgery

    Poldermans D;Boersma E;Bax Jj;Thomson Ir

  • QTc prolongation measured by standard 12-lead electrocardiography is an independent risk factor for sudden death due to cardiac arrest.

    A. Algra;J. G. P. Tijssen;J. R. T. C. Roelandt;J. Pool

  • Arterial wall characteristics determined by intravascular ultrasound imaging: An in vitro study☆

    Elma J. Gussenhoven;Catherina E. Essed;Charles T. Lancée;Frits Mastik

  • ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY IN DIAGNOSIS OF AORTIC DISSECTION

    AliceV. Stanton;Miriam Casey;EoinT. O'Brien;Raimund Erbel

  • Predictors of cardiac events after major vascular surgery: Role of clinical characteristics, dobutamine echocardiography, and beta-blocker therapy.

    Eric Boersma;Don Poldermans;Jeroen J. Bax;Ewout W. Steyerberg

  • Statins Are Associated With a Reduced Incidence of Perioperative Mortality in Patients Undergoing Major Noncardiac Vascular Surgery

    Don Poldermans;Jeroen J. Bax;Miklos D. Kertai;Boudewijn Krenning

  • Methodology, feasibility, safety and diagnostic accuracy of dobutamine stress echocardiography

    Marcel L. Geleijnse;Paolo M. Fioretti;Jos R.T.C. Roelandt

  • Effect of medical and surgical therapy on aortic dissection evaluated by transesophageal echocardiography. Implications for prognosis and therapy. The European Cooperative Study Group on Echocardiography.

    R Erbel;H Oelert;J Meyer;M Puth

  • Improvement of left ventricular ejection fraction, heart failure symptoms and prognosis after revascularization in patients with chronic coronary artery disease and viable myocardium detected by dobutamine stress echocardiography.

    Jeroen J. Bax;Don Poldermans;Abdou Elhendy;Jan H. Cornel

  • Prediction of improvement of regional left ventricular function after surgical revascularization. A comparison of low-dose dobutamine echocardiography with 201Tl single-photon emission computed tomography.

    Mariarosaria Arnese;Jan H. Cornel;Alessandro Salustri;Alexander P.W.M. Maat

  • Enhanced sensitivity for detection of coronary artery disease by addition of atropine to dobutamine stress echocardiography

    Albert J. McNeill;Paolo M. Fioretti;El Said M. El-Said;Alessandro Salustri

  • Heart rate variability from 24-hour electrocardiography and the 2-year risk for sudden death.

    A. Algra;J. G. P. Tijssen;J. R. T. C. Roelandt;J. Pool

  • A meta-analysis comparing the prognostic accuracy of six diagnostic tests for predicting perioperative cardiac risk in patients undergoing major vascular surgery

    M D Kertai;E Boersma;J J Bax;M H Heijenbrok-Kal

  • Improved Cardiac Risk Stratification in Major Vascular Surgery With Dobutamine-Atropine Stress Echocardiography

    Don Poldermans;Mariarosaria Arnese;Paolo M. Fioretti;Alessandro Salustri

  • Embolic potential of left ventricular thrombus after myocardial infarction: A two-dimensional echocardiographic study of 119 patients

    Cees A. Visser;Gerard Kan;Richard S. Meltzer;Arend J. Dunning

  • Recommendations for transoesophageal echocardiography: update 2010

    Frank Flachskampf;L. Badano;W. G. Daniel;R. O. Feneck

  • Predictors of cardiac events after major vascular surgery: role of clinical characteristics, dobutamine echocardiography, and beta-blocker therapy

    E Boersma;D Poldermans;J.J Bax

  • General cardiology abstractStatins are associated with a reduced incidence of perioperative mortality in patients undergoing major noncardiac vascular surgery

    D. Poldermans;J.J. Bax;M.D. Kertai

Frequent Co-Authors

Don Poldermans
Don Poldermans Erasmus University Rotterdam
Patrick W. Serruys
Patrick W. Serruys University of Galway
Eric Boersma
Eric Boersma Erasmus University Rotterdam
Ron T. van Domburg
Ron T. van Domburg Erasmus University Rotterdam
Pim J. de Feyter
Pim J. de Feyter Erasmus University Rotterdam
Jeroen J. Bax
Jeroen J. Bax Leiden University Medical Center
Nico de Jong
Nico de Jong Delft University of Technology
John Hess
John Hess Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Peter de Jaegere
Peter de Jaegere Erasmus University Rotterdam
Eric P. Krenning
Eric P. Krenning Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring medical careers or looking for alternative pathways into healthcare, several online degrees and certifications can open new doors. Programs in online medical billing and coding with financial aid provide flexible, affordable options to start a vital administrative role in healthcare without committing to years in school.

Aspiring nurses seeking accessible routes can look into accredited nursing schools that don't require teas test, making the nursing profession more attainable for those anxious about exam barriers.

If you prefer administrative or leadership roles, a healthcare administration associate degree online can be completed swiftly and prepares you for management positions within hospitals, clinics, and other medical facilities.

Finally, registered nurses looking to advance their careers may consider adn to np programs, which bridge the gap from an Associate Degree in Nursing to a Master’s level, opening paths toward nurse practitioner credentials.

Best Scientists Citing Jos R.T.C. Roelandt

Recently Published Articles