World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9539 8920 116 115 61 5277

Markus Conrad publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Markus Conrad between 2003 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Markus Conrad published across 22 years, from 2003 to 2024, averaging 2.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2015. 2 of the 62 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2003 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2015. 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 8 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications
2003 2024

62 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Markus Conrad: publications per year, 2003 to 2024
Year Publications
2003 1
2004 2
2005 3
2006 3
2007 4
2008 2
2009 2
2010 2
2011 4
2012 0
2013 2
2014 5
2015 8
2016 8
2017 3
2018 4
2019 3
2020 0
2021 3
2022 1
2023 0
2024 2
Total 62
Download as CSV

Markus Conrad publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Conrad sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 61–70 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 61 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299 61
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Markus Conrad D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Markus Conrad sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Markus Conrad is affiliated with the University of La Laguna in Spain. Their research contributions span several interconnected fields within psychology and neuroscience, with a particular focus on experimental and cognitive psychology as well as cognitive neuroscience.

Their work often explores topics that include:

  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • Categorization, perception, and language
  • Neural and behavioral psychology studies
  • Language, metaphor, and cognition
  • Color perception and design
  • Transcranial magnetic stimulation studies
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research

Markus Conrad has published papers in diverse venues, such as:

  • Cognition
  • Cognition & Emotion
  • Brain Sciences
  • Research Square (Research Square)
  • KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie

Selected recent publications include:

  • ERPs reveal an iconic relation between sublexical phonology and affective meaning, 2022, Cognition
  • The role of valence and arousal for phonological iconicity in the lexicon of German: a cross-validation study using pseudoword ratings, 2024, Cognition & Emotion
  • Light-Dependent Effects of Prefrontal rTMS on Emotional Working Memory, 2021, Brain Sciences
  • Conflict Detection In Affective Language Content: Affective Incongruency In Semantically Correct Sentences Describing Social Interactions Activates The Anterior Cingulate Cortex, 2021, Research Square (Research Square)
  • Conflict Detection in Language Processing: Using Affect Control Theory to Predict Neural Correlates of Affective Incongruency in Social Interactions, 2024, KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie

Frequent collaborators in Markus Conrad's work include:

  • David Schmidtke
  • Gesche Schauenburg
  • Arash Aryani
  • Chun-Ting Hsu
  • Tobias Schröder

The areas of specialization reflected in their work involve understanding brain mechanisms underlying language, emotion, and perception, often utilizing neuroimaging and noninvasive brain stimulation techniques. This multidisciplinary approach intersects psychology, neuroscience, and sociological aspects of language and affect.

Best Publications

  • The Berlin Affective Word List Reloaded (BAWL-R).

    Melissa L. H. Võ;Markus Conrad;Lars Kuchinke;Karolina Urton

  • The Word Frequency Effect A Review of Recent Developments and Implications for the Choice of Frequency Estimates in German

    Marc Brysbaert;Matthias Buchmeier;Markus Conrad;Arthur M. Jacobs

  • Incidental effects of emotional valence in single word processing: an fMRI study.

    Lars Kuchinke;Arthur M. Jacobs;Claudia Grubich;Melissa L.-H. Võ

  • The coupling of emotion and cognition in the eye: introducing the pupil old/new effect.

    Melissa L.-H. Võ;Arthur M. Jacobs;Lars Kuchinke;Markus Hofmann

  • Can Harry Potter still put a spell on us in a second language? An fMRI study on reading emotion-laden literature in late bilinguals.

    Chun-Ting Hsu;Arthur M. Jacobs;Markus Conrad

  • The Time Course of Emotion Effects in First and Second Language Processing: A Cross Cultural ERP Study with German-Spanish Bilinguals.

    Markus Conrad;Guillermo Recio;Arthur M. Jacobs

  • ANGST: affective norms for German sentiment terms, derived from the affective norms for English words.

    David S. Schmidtke;Tobias Schröder;Tobias Schröder;Arthur M. Jacobs;Markus Conrad;Markus Conrad

  • Cross-validating the Berlin Affective Word List.

    Melissa L. H. Võ;Arthur M. Jacobs;Markus Conrad

  • Replicating syllable frequency effects in Spanish in German: One more challenge to computational models of visual word recognition

    Markus Conrad;Arthur M. Jacobs

  • Fiction feelings in Harry Potter: haemodynamic response in the mid-cingulate cortex correlates with immersive reading experience.

    Chun-Ting Hsu;Markus Conrad;Arthur M. Jacobs

  • Measuring the Basic Affective Tone of Poems via Phonological Saliency and Iconicity

    Arash Aryani;Maria Kraxenberger;Susann Ullrich;Arthur M. Jacobs

  • The emotion potential of words and passages in reading Harry Potter--an fMRI study.

    Chun-Ting Hsu;Arthur M. Jacobs;Francesca M.M. Citron;Francesca M.M. Citron;Markus Conrad;Markus Conrad

  • Syllables and bigrams: orthographic redundancy and syllabic units affect visual word recognition at different processing levels.

    Markus Conrad;Manuel Carreiras;Sascha Tamm;Arthur M. Jacobs

  • On pleasure and thrill: the interplay between arousal and valence during visual word recognition.

    Guillermo Recio;Markus Conrad;Laura B. Hansen;Arthur M. Jacobs

  • Phonology as the source of syllable frequency effects in visual word recognition: evidence from French.

    Markus Conrad;Jonathan Grainger;Arthur M. Jacobs

  • Inhibitory effects of first syllable-frequency in lexical decision: an event-related potential study.

    Florian Hutzler;Jürgen Bergmann;Markus Conrad;Martin Kronbichler

  • The time course of emotion effects in first and second language processing

    Markus Conrad;Guillermo Recio;Arthur M. Jacobs

  • When emotions are expressed figuratively: Psycholinguistic and affective norms of 619 idioms for German (PANIG).

    Francesca M. M. Citron;Francesca M. M. Citron;Cristina Cacciari;Michael Kucharski;Luna Beck;Luna Beck

  • 10 years of BAWLing into affective and aesthetic processes in reading: what are the echoes?

    Arthur M. Jacobs;Melissa L.-H. Võ;Benny B. Briesemeister;Markus Conrad

  • Why 'piss' is ruder than 'pee'? The role of sound in affective meaning making.

    Arash Aryani;Markus Conrad;David Schmidtke;Arthur Jacobs

  • Phonological iconicity

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Arthur M. Jacobs
Arthur M. Jacobs Freie Universität Berlin
Lars Kuchinke
Lars Kuchinke International Psychoanalytic University Berlin
Manuel Carreiras
Manuel Carreiras Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language
Sonja A. Kotz
Sonja A. Kotz Maastricht University
Manfred Herrmann
Manfred Herrmann University of Bremen
Hauke R. Heekeren
Hauke R. Heekeren Universität Hamburg
Piotr Winkielman
Piotr Winkielman University of California, San Diego
Raffaella I. Rumiati
Raffaella I. Rumiati International School for Advanced Studies
Marc Brysbaert
Marc Brysbaert Ghent University
Jonathan Grainger
Jonathan Grainger Aix-Marseille University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a Psychology degree in the USA opens up diverse online options and fast tracks to related careers, especially in counseling. Many universities now offer flexible online programs, allowing students to balance coursework with personal and professional duties. These programs may include accelerated pathways for those eager to begin their careers sooner.

If you are interested in counseling, several states provide unique fast-track opportunities. For example, Pennsylvania accelerated counseling programs are designed to help students quickly qualify for licensure. Similarly, you can review the Rhode Island fastest counseling programs for options tailored to that region.

Additionally, those seeking the shortest path may find the shortest path to becoming a counselor in South Carolina or South Dakota accelerated counseling programs particularly beneficial. These programs can compress your timeline to practice while still providing the essential skills and training. Consider these options to discover the right blend of flexibility, speed, and quality for your psychology career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Markus Conrad

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles