World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stephen C. Wright

Stephen C. Wright

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
12838
World Ranking
8053
National Ranking
543

Stephen C. Wright publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen C. Wright sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 82 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Stephen C. Wright D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen C. Wright sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen C. Wright is affiliated with Simon Fraser University in Canada and has produced work primarily within the fields of Social Sciences and Psychology. Their research explores various subfields including Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology, Physiology, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Speech and Hearing.

The scientist's main topics of study encompass Social and Intergroup Psychology, Cultural Differences and Values, Voice and Speech Disorders, Racial and Ethnic Identity Research, Dysphagia Assessment and Management, Respiratory and Cough-Related Research, and Social Power and Status Dynamics.

Frequent publication venues for Wright include The Laryngoscope and Journal of Voice, each with three publications, as well as Nature Human Behaviour and Political Psychology, each with two publications. Other outlets of publication activity include Group Processes & Intergroup Relations.

Their research collaborations feature repeated coauthorship with:

  • Lyndsay L. Madden (6 publications)
  • Johannes Ullrich (4 publications)
  • Nurit Shnabel (4 publications)
  • Dominic Abrams (4 publications)
  • Lisa Droogendyk (4 publications)

Notable recent papers authored by or involving Wright include:

  • "Beyond Allyship: Motivations for Advantaged Group Members to Engage in Action for Disadvantaged Groups," 2020, Personality and Social Psychology Review
  • "A large-scale test of the link between intergroup contact and support for social change," 2020, Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Mentioning the Sample's Country in the Article's Title Leads to Bias in Research Evaluation," 2021, Social Psychological and Personality Science
  • "Need satisfaction in intergroup contact: A multinational study of pathways toward social change," 2021, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
  • "The More You Know": Critical Historical Knowledge About Indian Residential Schools Increases Non-Indigenous Canadians' Empathy for Indigenous Peoples," 2021, Political Psychology

Best Publications

  • The extended contact effect: Knowledge of cross-group friendships and prejudice.

    Stephen C. Wright;Arthur Aron;Tracy McLaughlin-Volpe;Stacy A. Ropp

  • Responding to membership in a disadvantaged group : from acceptance to collective protest

    Stephen C. Wright;Donald M. Taylor;Fathali M. Moghaddam

  • Cross-Group Friendships and Intergroup Attitudes A Meta-Analytic Review

    Kristin Davies;Linda R. Tropp;Arthur Aron;Thomas F. Pettigrew

  • Ingroup Identification as the Inclusion of Ingroup in the Self

    Linda R. Tropp;Stephen C. Wright

  • The Personal/Group Discrimination Discrepancy Perceiving My Group, but not Myself, to be a Target for Discrimination

    Donald M. Taylor;Stephen C. Wright;Fathali M. Moghaddam;Richard N. Lalonde

  • Yet another dark side of chivalry: Benevolent sexism undermines and hostile sexism motivates collective action for social change.

    Julia C. Becker;Stephen C. Wright

  • Including others in the self

    Arthur Aron;Tracy McLaughlin-Volpe;Debra Mashek;Gary Lewandowski

  • Social Psychology in Cross-Cultural Perspective

    Fathali M. Moghaddam;Donald M. Taylor;Stephen C. Wright

  • Vicarious intergroup contact effects: Applying social-cognitive theory to intergroup contact research.

    Agostino Mazziotta;Amélie Mummendey;Stephen C. Wright

  • The struggle for social equality: Collective action versus prejudice reduction.

    Stephen C. Wright;Micah E. Lubensky

  • Beyond Allyship: Motivations for Advantaged Group Members to Engage in Action for Disadvantaged Groups:

    Helena R M Radke;Maja Kutlaca;Maja Kutlaca;Birte Siem;Stephen C Wright

  • The next generation of collective action research.

    Stephen C. Wright

  • Acting in Solidarity: Cross‐Group Contact between Disadvantaged Group Members and Advantaged Group Allies

    Lisa Droogendyk;Stephen C. Wright;Micah Lubensky;Winnifred R. Louis

  • Strategic Collective Action: Social Psychology and Social Change

    Stephen C. Wright

  • Friend or Ally Whether Cross-Group Contact Undermines Collective Action Depends on What Advantaged Group Members Say (or Don’t Say)

    Julia C. Becker;Stephen C. Wright;Micah E. Lubensky;Shelly Zhou

  • Collective action in response to disadvantage: Intergroup perceptions, social identification, and social change.

    Stephen C. Wright;Linda R. Tropp

  • Ingroup identification and relative deprivation : an examination across multiple social comparisons

    Linda R. Tropp;Stephen C. Wright

  • Identity and the language of the classroom: Investigating the impact of heritage versus second language instruction on personal and collective self-esteem.

    Stephen C. Wright;Donald M. Taylor

  • A large-scale test of the link between intergroup contact and support for social change.

    Tabea Hässler;Johannes Ullrich;Michelle Bernardino;Nurit Shnabel

  • Subtractive Bilingualism and the Survival of the Inuit Language: Heritage- Versus Second-Language Education

    Stephen C. Wright;Donald M. Taylor;Judy Macarthur

  • Ambiguity, Social Influence, and Collective Action: Generating Collective Protest in Response to Tokenism

    Stephen C. Wright

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald M. Taylor
Donald M. Taylor McGill University
Linda R. Tropp
Linda R. Tropp University of Massachusetts Amherst
Arthur Aron
Arthur Aron Stony Brook University
Julia C. Becker
Julia C. Becker Osnabrück University
Dominic Abrams
Dominic Abrams University of Kent
Fathali M. Moghaddam
Fathali M. Moghaddam University of Washington
Michał Bilewicz
Michał Bilewicz University of Warsaw
Roberto Baiocco
Roberto Baiocco Sapienza University of Rome
Winnifred R. Louis
Winnifred R. Louis University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees opens doors to various flexible learning options and diverse career opportunities. Prospective students are increasingly drawn to affordable programs that offer strong academic grounding while remaining accessible to a range of budgets.

Many regions in the USA provide accessible pathways. If you are seeking most affordable psychology degree programs in Boca Raton, you'll find reputable institutions catering to both in-state and out-of-state learners. Likewise, the most affordable psychology degree programs in Boston offer a blend of academic excellence and affordability ideal for urban learners.

Students on the West Coast can access affordable psychology programs in California, with a mix of online and hybrid formats. For broader statewide options, Florida is a compelling choice—explore the cheapest psychology degrees in Florida to find budget-friendly programs that do not compromise on quality.

With so many programs available, students should consider factors such as cost, flexibility, accreditation, and curriculum to select the best-fit online degree and career pathway in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen C. Wright

Trending Scientists