World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 43 4465 4127 2121 1924 135 7005

Mark Meterko publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark Meterko between 1990 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark Meterko published across 34 years, from 1990 to 2023, averaging 4.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2013. 7 of the 145 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1990 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2013. 1990: 5 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 9 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 5 publications
1990 2023

145 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark Meterko: publications per year, 1990 to 2023
Year Publications
1990 5
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 0
1996 1
1997 1
1998 0
1999 2
2000 2
2001 2
2002 2
2003 1
2004 4
2005 1
2006 3
2007 4
2008 5
2009 5
2010 8
2011 5
2012 5
2013 14
2014 7
2015 6
2016 9
2017 11
2018 7
2019 11
2020 10
2021 6
2022 2
2023 5
Total 145
Download as CSV

Mark Meterko publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Meterko sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 134–143 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 135 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434 135
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark Meterko D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Meterko sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300 43
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark Meterko is affiliated with Boston University in the United States and conducts research primarily in the fields of medicine and health professions. Their scholarly work centers on healthcare systems, clinical diagnostic processes, and patient-related outcomes in medical settings.

Their main fields of study include:

  • Medicine
  • Health Professions

Subfields of research encompass topics such as:

  • General Health Professions
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management
  • Family Practice
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Neurology

The primary topics addressed in their publications are:

  • Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
  • Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Electronic Health Records Systems

Mark Meterko has contributed articles to several frequent publication venues, including:

  • Health Services Research
  • Medical Care
  • Journal of the Endocrine Society
  • JAMA Network Open
  • Patient Education and Counseling

The scientist's recent papers include:

  • "Attitudes and Intentions of US Veterans Regarding COVID-19 Vaccination," 2021, JAMA Network Open
  • "Effective provider-patient communication of a rare disease diagnosis: A qualitative study of people diagnosed with schwannomatosis," 2020, Patient Education and Counseling
  • "Development and psychometric assessment of a survey to measure specialty care coordination as experienced by primary care providers," 2020, Health Services Research
  • "The Patient Perceptions of Deprescribing (PPoD) Survey: Short-Form Development," 2020, Drugs & Aging
  • "Understanding barriers to diagnosis in a rare, genetic disease: Delays and errors in diagnosing schwannomatosis," 2022, American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A

Frequent collaborators in Meterko's work include:

  • Varsha G. Vimalananda
  • Jolie B. Wormwood
  • Shirley Qian
  • B. Graeme Fincke
  • Kailyn E. Sitter

Best Publications

  • Patient satisfaction with hospital care: effects of demographic and institutional characteristics.

    Gary J. Young;Mark Meterko;Kamal R. Desai

  • Teamwork culture and patient satisfaction in hospitals.

    Mark Meterko;David C Mohr;Gary J Young

  • Workforce Perceptions of Hospital Safety Culture: Development and Validation of the Patient Safety Climate in Healthcare Organizations Survey

    Sara J. Singer;M Meterko;Laurence C. Baker;David M. Gaba

  • Assessing an organizational culture instrument based on the Competing Values Framework: Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses

    Christian D. Helfrich;Yu Fang Li;David C. Mohr;David C. Mohr;Mark Meterko;Mark Meterko

  • Mortality among Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: The Influences of Patient-Centered Care and Evidence-Based Medicine

    Mark Meterko;Steven Wright;Hai Lin;Elliott Lowy

  • Physician Burnout: An Examination of Personal, Professional, and Organizational Relationships

    Gloria Deckard;Mark Meterko;Diane Field

  • Identifying Organizational Cultures That Promote Patient Safety

    Sara Singer;Alyson Falwell;David Gaba;Mark Meterko

  • Evidence-based practice and patient-centered care: Doing both well.

    Ryann L Engle;David C Mohr;Sally K Holmes;Marjorie Nealon Seibert

  • Psychometric assessment of the Neurobehavioral Symptom Inventory-22: the structure of persistent postconcussive symptoms following deployment-related mild traumatic brain injury among veterans.

    Mark Meterko;Errol Baker;Kelly L. Stolzmann;Ann M. Hendricks

  • Influence of patient and hospital factors on consumer satisfaction with inpatient mental health treatment.

    Robert Rosenheck;Nancy J. Wilson;Mark Meterko

  • Relationship of hospital organizational culture to patient safety climate in the Veterans Health Administration.

    Christine W. Hartmann;Mark Meterko;Amy K. Rosen;Shibei Zhao

  • Psychiatric Diagnoses and Neurobehavioral Symptom Severity among OEF/OIF VA Patients with Deployment-Related Traumatic Brain Injury: A Gender Comparison

    Katherine M. Iverson;Ann M. Hendricks;Ann M. Hendricks;Rachel Kimerling;Maxine Krengel;Maxine Krengel

  • Response Rates, Nonresponse Bias, and Data QualityResults from a National Survey of Senior Healthcare Leaders

    Mark Meterko;Joseph D. Restuccia;Kelly Stolzmann;David Mohr

  • Impact of the "polytrauma clinical triad" on sleep disturbance in a department of veterans affairs outpatient rehabilitation setting.

    Henry L. Lew;Terri K. Pogoda;Pei-Te Hsu;Sara Cohen

  • Effects of paying physicians based on their relative performance for quality.

    Gary J. Young;Mark Meterko;Howard Beckman;Errol Baker

  • Patient judgments of hospital quality. A taxonomy.

    Mark Meterko;Haya R. Rubin

  • The Patient Judgments of Hospital Quality (PJHQ) Questionnaire.

    Haya R. Rubin;John E. Ware Jr.;Eugene C. Nelson;Mark Meterko

  • Mental illness as a predictor of satisfaction with inpatient care at Veterans Affairs hospitals.

    Rani A. Hoff;Robert A. Rosenheck;Mark Meterko;Nancy J. Wilson

  • An overview of patient safety climate in the VA.

    Christine W Hartmann;Amy K Rosen;Mark Meterko;Priti Shokeen

  • Development of a short-form Learning Organization Survey: the LOS-27.

    Sara J. Singer;Scott C. Moore;Mark Meterko;Mark Meterko;Sandra Williams

  • Prevalence of dual sensory impairment and its association with traumatic brain injury and blast exposure in OEF/OIF veterans.

    Henry L. Lew;Terri K. Pogoda;Errol Baker;Kelly L. Stolzmann

Frequent Co-Authors

David C. Mohr
David C. Mohr Northwestern University
Gary J. Young
Gary J. Young Northeastern University
Sara J. Singer
Sara J. Singer Stanford University
James F. Burgess
James F. Burgess Boston University
Amy K. Rosen
Amy K. Rosen VA Boston Healthcare System
Alan M. Jette
Alan M. Jette MGH Institute of Health Professions
Dan R. Berlowitz
Dan R. Berlowitz University of Massachusetts Lowell
Katherine M. Iverson
Katherine M. Iverson Boston University
Christopher J. Miller
Christopher J. Miller University of California, Davis
Mark S. Bauer
Mark S. Bauer Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in the Social Sciences and Humanities opens diverse pathways in counseling, education, and psychology. Online degrees have become a flexible way to gain specialized knowledge, meet licensing requirements, and advance professionally.

Prospective psychologists may be searching for the cheapest psyd programs, which can allow for doctoral-level study with reduced financial pressure. If you're interested in therapy and counseling, there are accredited marriage and family therapy programs online that offer the flexibility and speed to begin your practice sooner.

For those considering graduate study, a masters in psychology online brings affordability and convenience, while expanding your career options in research, teaching, or mental health services. Educational professionals seeking to move into leadership may benefit from online doctorate of education programs, with some offering fast-track routes to advanced positions.

Each pathway offers unique advantages and considerations—think about program accreditation, career outcomes, and which learning format best fits your lifestyle and goals.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Meterko

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles