World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Adrienne S. Juarascio

Adrienne S. Juarascio

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 39 8632 8065 4599 4190 202 5601

Adrienne S. Juarascio publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Adrienne S. Juarascio between 2009 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Adrienne S. Juarascio published across 17 years, from 2009 to 2025, averaging 13.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 36 publications in 2024. 45 of the 222 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2009 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 36. Peak 36 publications in 2024. 2009: 1 publication 2010: 5 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 15 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 33 publications 2022: 35 publications 2023: 22 publications 2024: 36 publications 2025: 9 publications
2009 2025

222 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Adrienne S. Juarascio: publications per year, 2009 to 2025
Year Publications
2009 1
2010 5
2011 8
2012 3
2013 9
2014 5
2015 7
2016 6
2017 6
2018 4
2019 15
2020 18
2021 33
2022 35
2023 22
2024 36
2025 9
Total 222
Download as CSV

Adrienne S. Juarascio publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adrienne S. Juarascio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 202 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328 202
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Adrienne S. Juarascio D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adrienne S. Juarascio sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641 39
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Adrienne S. Juarascio is affiliated with Drexel University in the United States and conducts research primarily in the field of psychology, with a specialized focus on clinical psychology.

Their scholarly work extensively covers topics related to eating disorders and behaviors, obsessive-compulsive spectrum disorders, obesity, physical activity, and diet. Additional areas of focus include behavioral health and interventions, the impact of technology on adolescents, body image and dysmorphia studies, and mindfulness and compassion interventions.

Major publication venues for Adrienne S. Juarascio include:

  • International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • Eating and Weight Disorders - Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity
  • European Eating Disorders Review
  • Eating Disorders
  • Appetite

Several recent papers authored or coauthored by Adrienne S. Juarascio are:

  • COVID-19 and binge eating: Patient perceptions of eating disorder symptoms, tele-therapy, and treatment implications, 2021, Current Psychology
  • The momentary interplay of affect, attention bias, and expectancies as predictors of binge eating in the natural environment, 2020, International Journal of Eating Disorders
  • A Clinician-Controlled Just-in-time Adaptive Intervention System (CBT+) Designed to Promote Acquisition and Utilization of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Skills in Bulimia Nervosa: Development and Preliminary Evaluation Study, 2021, JMIR Formative Research
  • Comprehensive Cognitive-Behavioral Interventions Augment Diaphragmatic Breathing for Rumination Syndrome: A Proof-of-Concept Trial, 2020, Digestive Diseases and Sciences
  • Understanding the overlap and differences in terms describing patterns of maladaptive avoidance and intolerance of negative emotional states, 2020, Personality and Individual Differences

Adrienne S. Juarascio frequently collaborates with several researchers, including:

  • Stephanie M. Manasse
  • Elizabeth W. Lampe
  • Emily K. Presseller
  • Paakhi Srivastava
  • Evan M. Forman

The subfields of study addressed in their work include clinical psychology, public health, environmental and occupational health, applied psychology, sociology and political science, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

Best Publications

  • A pilot study of acceptance and commitment therapy for promotion of physical activity.

    Meghan L. Butryn;Evan Forman;Kimberly Hoffman;Jena Shaw

  • Acceptance and commitment therapy as a novel treatment for eating disorders: an initial test of efficacy and mediation.

    Adrienne Juarascio;Jena Shaw;Evan Forman;C. Alix Timko

  • The mind your health project: a randomized controlled trial of an innovative behavioral treatment for obesity.

    E.M. Forman;M.L. Butryn;A.S. Juarascio;L.E. Bradley

  • Acceptance and commitment therapy versus cognitive therapy for the treatment of comorbid eating pathology.

    Adrienne S. Juarascio;Evan M. Forman;James D. Herbert

  • Review of Smartphone Applications for the Treatment of Eating Disorders

    Adrienne S. Juarascio;Stephanie M. Manasse;Stephanie P. Goldstein;Evan M. Forman

  • Pro-Eating Disorder Communities on Social Networking Sites: A Content Analysis

    Adrienne S Juarascio;Amber Shoaib;C Alix Timko

  • The Drexel defusion scale: A new measure of experiential distancing

    Evan M. Forman;James D. Herbert;Adrienne S. Juarascio;Peter D. Yeomans

  • Acceptance based behavior therapy for social anxiety disorder through videoconferencing.

    Erica K. Yuen;James D. Herbert;Evan M. Forman;Elizabeth M. Goetter;Elizabeth M. Goetter

  • Comparison of acceptance-based and standard cognitive-based coping strategies for craving sweets in overweight and obese women.

    Evan M. Forman;Kimberly L. Hoffman;Adrienne S. Juarascio;Meghan L. Butryn

  • Mindfulness and its relationship with eating disorders symptomatology in women receiving residential treatment.

    Meghan L. Butryn;Adrienne Juarascio;Jena Shaw;Stephanie G. Kerrigan

  • Shame among people living with HIV: a literature review

    David S Bennett;Kerry Traub;Lauren Mace;Adrienne Juarascio

  • Do executive functioning deficits underpin binge eating disorder? A comparison of overweight women with and without binge eating pathology

    Stephanie M. Manasse;Evan M. Forman;Anthony C. Ruocco;Meghan L. Butryn

  • Return of the JITAI: Applying a Just-in-Time Adaptive Intervention Framework to the Development of m-Health Solutions for Addictive Behaviors.

    Stephanie P Goldstein;Brittney C Evans;Daniel Flack;Adrienne Juarascio

  • The development and validation of the food craving acceptance and action questionnaire (FAAQ)

    Adrienne Juarascio;Evan Forman;C. Alix Timko;Meghan Butryn

  • Moderators of the relationship between body image dissatisfaction and disordered eating.

    Adrienne S. Juarascio;Julie Perone;C. Alix Timko

  • Perceptions of the feasibility and acceptability of a smartphone application for the treatment of binge eating disorders: Qualitative feedback from a user population and clinicians

    Adrienne S. Juarascio;Stephanie P. Goldstein;Stephanie M. Manasse;Evan M. Forman

  • Could training executive function improve treatment outcomes for eating disorders

    Adrienne S. Juarascio;Stephanie M. Manasse;Hallie M. Espel;Stephanie G. Kerrigan

  • Acceptance-based exposure therapy for public speaking anxiety

    Erica L. England;James D. Herbert;Evan M. Forman;Stephanie J. Rabin

  • Executive functioning in overweight individuals with and without loss-of-control eating

    Stephanie M. Manasse;Adrienne S. Juarascio;Evan M. Forman;Laura A. Berner

  • Implicit internalization of the thin ideal as a predictor of increases in weight, body dissatisfaction, and disordered eating

    Adrienne S. Juarascio;Evan M . Forman;C. Alix Timko;James D. Herbert

  • From Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) to Ecological Momentary Intervention (EMI): Past and Future Directions for Ambulatory Assessment and Interventions in Eating Disorders.

    Kathryn E Smith;Adrienne Juarascio

Frequent Co-Authors

Evan M. Forman
Evan M. Forman Drexel University
Stephanie M. Manasse
Stephanie M. Manasse Drexel University
Meghan L. Butryn
Meghan L. Butryn Drexel University
James D. Herbert
James D. Herbert University of New England
C. Alix Timko
C. Alix Timko Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Michael R. Lowe
Michael R. Lowe Drexel University
Anthony C. Ruocco
Anthony C. Ruocco University of Toronto
Stephen A. Wonderlich
Stephen A. Wonderlich University of North Dakota
Heather Thompson-Brenner
Heather Thompson-Brenner Boston University
Tyler B. Mason
Tyler B. Mason University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a psychology degree in the USA offers diverse career options in education, healthcare, business, and clinical practice. Many students now opt for online graduate programs, which provide flexibility and affordability.

For those interested in working with young people, consider exploring affordable masters in child and adolescent psychology online. This pathway leads to roles in schools, counseling centers, and youth services.

If workplace dynamics and organizational behavior inspire you, an affordable online master's in organizational psychology can unlock careers in human resources, consulting, or leadership development.

Aspiring professionals in behavior analysis can benefit from the best affordable bcba online programs, preparing them for rewarding roles supporting individuals with behavioral challenges.

For those dedicated to clinical work, the cheapest online graduate degrees in clinical psychology pave the way for licensure and careers in therapy, assessment, or mental health care.

Each of these online degrees can provide both a strong academic foundation and cost-effective routes to fulfilling psychology careers.

Best Scientists Citing Adrienne S. Juarascio

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles