World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
31
Citations
3540
World Ranking
8252
National Ranking
2731

Scott R. Abella publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott R. Abella sits on this spectrum.

37–46 publications: 11 scientists 47–56 publications: 41 scientists 57–66 publications: 147 scientists 67–76 publications: 219 scientists 77–86 publications: 409 scientists 87–96 publications: 467 scientists 97–106 publications: 613 scientists 107–116 publications: 585 scientists 117–126 publications: 591 scientists 127–136 publications: 567 scientists 137–146 publications: 535 scientists 147–156 publications: 481 scientists 157–166 publications: 404 scientists 167–176 publications: 338 scientists 177–186 publications: 362 scientists 187–196 publications: 309 scientists 197–206 publications: 246 scientists 207–216 publications: 223 scientists 217–226 publications: 205 scientists 227–236 publications: 167 scientists 237–246 publications: 141 scientists 247–256 publications: 150 scientists 257–266 publications: 125 scientists 267–276 publications: 113 scientists 277–286 publications: 92 scientists 287–296 publications: 81 scientists 297–306 publications: 77 scientists 307–316 publications: 64 scientists 317–326 publications: 47 scientists 327–336 publications: 58 scientists 337–346 publications: 52 scientists 347–356 publications: 48 scientists 357–366 publications: 50 scientists 367–376 publications: 30 scientists 377–386 publications: 30 scientists 387–396 publications: 34 scientists 397–406 publications: 25 scientists 407–416 publications: 17 scientists 417–426 publications: 12 scientists 427–436 publications: 20 scientists 437–446 publications: 9 scientists 447–456 publications: 12 scientists 457–466 publications: 11 scientists 467–476 publications: 13 scientists 477–486 publications: 10 scientists 487–496 publications: 7 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 10 scientists 517–526 publications: 9 scientists 527–532 publications: 6 scientists 533+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 533+

This scientist: 196 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 533 publications or more.

Scott R. Abella D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott R. Abella sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 152 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 28 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 8 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121 D-Index: 3 scientists 122+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 122+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 122 D-Index or more.

Overview

Scott R. Abella is affiliated with the University of Nevada, Las Vegas in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, with extensive work in subfields such as nature and landscape conservation, ecology, global and planetary change, plant science, and ecology, evolution, behavior, and systematics.

The scientist's main research topics include:

  • Ecology and vegetation dynamics studies
  • Rangeland and wildlife management
  • Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Botany, ecology, and taxonomy studies
  • Species distribution and climate change
  • Forest ecology and biodiversity studies
  • Plant and animal studies

Scott R. Abella has published research in a variety of venues. Notably, they have contributed the most to Ecological Restoration, with six publications, followed by Invasive Plant Science and Management with four, Restoration Ecology with three, Plant Ecology with two, and Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society with one.

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Scott R. Abella include:

  • Lindsay P. Chiquoine
  • Timothy A. Schetter
  • Karen S. Menard
  • LaRae A. Sprow
  • Charles D. Schelz

Some of the recent notable papers authored by or involving Scott R. Abella are:

  • Resilience and alternative stable states after desert wildfires, 2020, published in Ecological Monographs
  • Rapid and transient changes during 20 years of restoration management in savanna-woodland-prairie habitats threatened by woody plant encroachment, 2020, published in Plant Ecology
  • The effect of natural disturbances on forest biodiversity: an ecological synthesis, 2022, published in Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society (authored by Mari-Liis Viljur but listed among recent papers)

Other recent contributions include studies on juvenile conifer growth characteristics in the southwestern United States published in Ecosphere, and research on biotic and abiotic treatments for restoring plant communities and soil functions published in Restoration Ecology.

Best Publications

  • The effect of natural disturbances on forest biodiversity: an ecological synthesis

    Unknown

  • Disturbance and Plant Succession in the Mojave and Sonoran Deserts of the American Southwest

    Scott R. Abella

  • Sustainability of utility‐scale solar energy – critical ecological concepts

    Kara A. Moore-O'Leary;Rebecca R. Hernandez;Dave S. Johnston;Scott R. Abella

  • Rapidly restoring biological soil crusts and ecosystem functions in a severely disturbed desert ecosystem.

    Lindsay P. Chiquoine;Scott R. Abella;Matthew A. Bowker

  • Ten years of vegetation assembly after a North American mega fire

    Scott R. Abella;Paula J. Fornwalt

  • Estimating Organic Carbon from Loss-On-Ignition in Northern Arizona Forest Soils

    Scott R. Abella;Brian W. Zimmer

  • Abiotic and biotic factors explain independent gradients of plant community composition in ponderosa pine forests

    Daniel C. Laughlin;Scott R. Abella

  • Effects of tree cutting and fire on understory vegetation in mixed conifer forests

    Scott R. Abella;Judith D. Springer

  • Post-Fire Plant Recovery in the Mojave and Sonoran Deserts of Western North America

    Scott R. Abella

  • Spatial variation in reference conditions: historical tree density and pattern on a Pinus ponderosa landscape

    Scott R. AbellaS.R. Abella;Scott R. AbellaS.R. Abella;Charles W. DentonC.W. Denton;Charles W. DentonC.W. Denton

  • Vegetation recovery in a desert landscape after wildfires: influences of community type, time since fire and contingency effects

    E. Cayenne Engel;Scott R. Abella

  • Identifying Native Vegetation for Reducing Exotic Species during the Restoration of Desert Ecosystems

    Scott R. Abella;Donovan J. Craig;Stanley D. Smith;Alice C. Newton

  • Monitoring an Arizona Ponderosa Pine Restoration: Sampling Efficiency and Multivariate Analysis of Understory Vegetation

    Scott R. Abella;W. Wallace Covington

  • Species richness and soil properties in Pinus ponderosa forests: A structural equation modeling analysis

    Daniel C. Laughlin;Scott R. Abella;W. Wallace Covington;James B. Grace

  • A systematic review of species performance and treatment effectiveness for revegetation in the Mojave Desert, USA

    Scott R. Abella;Alice C. Newton

  • Factors affecting exotic annual plant cover and richness along roadsides in the eastern Mojave Desert, USA

    Donovan J. Craig;Jill E. Craig;Scott R. Abella;Cheryl H. Vanier

  • Vegetation-environment relationships and ecological species groups of an Arizona Pinus ponderosa landscape, USA

    Scott R. Abella;W. Wallace Covington

  • Effectiveness of Exotic Plant Treatments on National Park Service Lands in the United States

    Scott R. Abella

  • Climate, trees, pests, and weeds: Change, uncertainty, and biotic stressors in eastern U.S. national park forests

    Nicholas A. Fisichelli;Scott R. Abella;Matthew Peters;Frank J. Krist

  • Diameter caps for thinning southwestern ponderosa pine forests: Viewpoints, effects, and tradeoffs

    Scott R. Abella;Peter Z. Fule;W. Wallace Covington

  • Assessing an exotic plant surveying program in the Mojave Desert, Clark County, Nevada, USA.

    Scott R. Abella;Jessica E. Spencer;Joshua Hoines;Carrie Nazarchyk

  • Long‐term response of a Mojave Desert winter annual plant community to a whole‐ecosystem atmospheric CO2 manipulation (FACE)

    Stanley D. Smith;Therese N. Charlet;Stephen F. Zitzer;Scott R. Abella

  • Post-fire plant recovery in the Mojave and Sonoran Deserts of western

    S. R. Abella

Frequent Co-Authors

W. Wallace Covington
W. Wallace Covington Northern Arizona University
Stanley D. Smith
Stanley D. Smith University of Nevada, Las Vegas
Peter Z. Fulé
Peter Z. Fulé Northern Arizona University
Jeffrey E. Lovich
Jeffrey E. Lovich United States Geological Survey
Daniel C. Laughlin
Daniel C. Laughlin University of Wyoming
Penelope Morgan
Penelope Morgan University of Idaho
Thomas Kolb
Thomas Kolb Northern Arizona University
Michael R. Rosen
Michael R. Rosen United States Geological Survey
Miriam Muñoz-Rojas
Miriam Muñoz-Rojas University of New South Wales
David J. Merritt
David J. Merritt University of Western Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in Ecology and Evolution or seeking alternative pathways, several related online degrees are worth exploring. Many students enter fields such as environmental science, conservation, or even healthcare, using flexible online degree programs to advance their education.

For those looking at healthcare as a related path, direct entry msn programs online allow non-nursing bachelor’s holders to pivot to advanced nursing. Aspiring nurses comparing schools should review differences like format, support, and cost—learn more at capella university vs wgu rn to bsn.

Bridge programs are another option, and rn to bsn to msn online programs present a streamlined educational route for those with an associate degree or diploma in nursing. If you prefer institutions with strong accreditation and non-profit status, see the complete list of non profit colleges known for quality and value.

Exploring these online degree options can expand your career pathways beyond traditional ecology roles—empowering you to combine scientific knowledge with skills in healthcare, research, and public service.

Best Scientists Citing Scott R. Abella

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles