World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
35
Citations
5302
World Ranking
7333
National Ranking
124

Bálint Czúcz publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bálint Czúcz sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 98 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Bálint Czúcz D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bálint Czúcz sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bálint Czúcz is affiliated with the Hungarian Academy of Sciences in Hungary. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with a focus on subfields such as Global and Planetary Change, Plant Science, Ecology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, and Economics and Econometrics.

The scientist's research covers a variety of topics related to ecosystems, land use, and biodiversity. The main topics include:

  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
  • Environmental Conservation and Management
  • Economic and Environmental Valuation
  • Sustainable Agricultural Systems Analysis
  • Plant and Animal Studies
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies

Among recent publications are:

  • "A global biodiversity observing system to unite monitoring and guide action", 2023, Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • "Selection criteria for ecosystem condition indicators", 2021, Ecological Indicators
  • "A common typology for ecosystem characteristics and ecosystem condition variables", 2021, One Ecosystem
  • "A review of ecosystem condition accounts: lessons learned and options for further development", 2020, One Ecosystem
  • "Disentangling the ecosystem service 'flood regulation': Mechanisms and relevant ecosystem condition characteristics", 2022, AMBIO

Bálint Czúcz has contributed notably to a set of frequently publishing venues, including:

  • One Ecosystem
  • Ecological Indicators
  • Sustainability
  • Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • Ecosystem Services

The network of frequent co-authors includes:

  • Joachim Maes
  • Gyula Pinke
  • Ágnes Vári
  • Heather Keith
  • Amanda Driver

The body of work reflects a multidisciplinary approach, integrating ecosystem services, biodiversity monitoring, and environmental valuation frameworks to support informed decision-making and conservation policy development. Their involvement in topics such as flood regulation mechanisms also highlights an applied aspect of their research in ecosystem service functionality.

Best Publications

  • Alien species in a warmer world: risks and opportunities

    Gian Reto Walther;Alain Roques;Philip E. Hulme;Martin T. Sykes

  • An indicator framework for assessing ecosystem services in support of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020

    Joachim Maes;Camino Liquete;Anne Teller;Markus Erhard

  • Wild plants used for food by Hungarian ethnic groups living in the Carpathian Basin

    Andrea Dénes;Nóra Papp;Dániel Babai;Bálint Czúcz

  • When we cannot have it all: Ecosystem services trade-offs in the context of spatial planning

    Francis Turkelboom;Michael Leone;Sander Jacobs;Eszter Kelemen

  • Selecting methods for ecosystem service assessment: a decision tree approach

    Paula A. Harrison;Robert Dunford;David Nicholas Barton;Eszter Kelemen

  • Where concepts meet the real world: A systematic review of ecosystem service indicators and their classification using CICES

    Bálint Czúcz;Ildikó Arany;Marion Potschin-Young;Krisztina Bereczki

  • A comparative framework for broad‐scale plot‐based vegetation classification

    Miquel De Cáceres;Milan Chytrý;Emiliano Agrillo;Fabio Attorre

  • Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services : Indicators for ecosystem assessments under Action 5 of the EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020

    Joachim Maes;Anne Teller;Markus Erhard;Patrick Murphy

  • Present and forecasted xeric climatic limits of beech and sessile oak distribution at low altitudes in Central Europe

    Bálint Czúcz;László Gálhidy;Csaba Mátyás

  • Key criteria for developing ecosystem service indicators to inform decision making

    Alexander P.E. van Oudenhoven;Matthias Schröter;Evangelina G. Drakou;Ilse R. Geijzendorffer

  • Future of Beech in Southeast Europe from the Perspective of Evolutionary Ecology

    Csaba Mátyás;Imre Berki;Bálint Czúcz;Borbála Gálos

  • A global biodiversity observing system to unite monitoring and guide action

    Unknown

  • Stakeholders’ perspectives on the operationalisation of the ecosystem service concept: Results from 27 case studies

    Jan Dick;Francis Turkelboom;Helen Woods;Irene Iniesta-Arandia

  • Testing the ability of functional diversity indices to detect trait convergence and divergence using individual‐based simulation

    Zoltán Botta-Dukát;Bálint Czúcz

  • Integrating methods for ecosystem service assessment: Experiences from real world situations

    Rob Dunford;Paula Harrison;Alison Smith;Jan Dick

  • Regeneration of sandy old-fields in the forest steppe region of Hungary

    A. Csecserits;B. Czúcz;M. Halassy;G. Kröel-Dulay

  • Practical application of spatial ecosystem service models to aid decision support

    Grazia Zulian;Erik Stange;Helen Woods;Laurence Carvalho

  • Drivers of grassland loss in Hungary during the post-socialist transformation (1987-1999)

    Marianna Biró;Bálint Czúcz;Ferenc Horváth;András Révész

  • The influence of environment, management and site context on species composition of summer arable weed vegetation in Hungary

    Gyula Pinke;Péter Karácsony;Bálint Czúcz;Zoltán Botta-Dukát

  • Remote sensing and GIS for habitat quality monitoring: New approaches and future research

    András Zlinszky;Hermann Heilmeier;Heiko Balzter;Bálint Czúcz

  • Environmental and land-use variables determining the abundance of Ambrosia artemisiifolia in arable fields in Hungary.

    Gyula Pinke;Péter Karácsony;Bálint Czúcz;Zoltán Botta-Dukát

  • Implementation and application of multiple potential natural vegetation models - a case study of Hungary

    Imelda Somodi;Zsolt Molnár;Bálint Czúcz;Ákos Bede‐Fazekas

  • Flowering phenological changes in relation to climate change in Hungary

    Barbara Szabó;Barbara Szabó;Enikő Vincze;Bálint Czúcz

  • The link between landscape pattern and vegetation naturalness on a regional scale

    Péter Szilassi;Teodóra Bata;Szilárd Szabó;Bálint Czúcz

Frequent Co-Authors

Zoltán Botta-Dukát
Zoltán Botta-Dukát Institute of Ecology and Botany
Zsolt Molnár
Zsolt Molnár Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Joachim Maes
Joachim Maes KU Leuven
Erik Gómez-Baggethun
Erik Gómez-Baggethun Norwegian University of Life Sciences
David N. Barton
David N. Barton Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
Emily Nicholson
Emily Nicholson Deakin University
Ignacio Palomo
Ignacio Palomo Grenoble Alpes University
David M. Lapola
David M. Lapola State University of Campinas
Heather Keith
Heather Keith Griffith University
Laurence Carvalho
Laurence Carvalho Natural Environment Research Council

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can lead to diverse and fulfilling professional journeys. Today, a wide range of online degrees support students from all backgrounds, making advanced education more accessible than ever.

Those with military commitments may benefit from flexible online colleges for military, which offer support tailored to service members and veterans. For individuals interested in environmental policy, community engagement, or advocacy, a masters in social work online can open doors to roles where you create positive social and ecological impacts.

Rapid pathways to further study are also available. For example, a 1 year master's in psychology online allows quick entry into research or applied fields that intersect with human behavior and conservation. Likewise, those aiming to support community well-being within environmental contexts may consider a masters degree in counseling online.

Online learning pathways make it easier to align educational goals with evolving career ambitions in Ecology, Evolution, and related disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Bálint Czúcz

Trending Scientists