World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
46
Citations
6757
World Ranking
4695
National Ranking
11

Balázs Deák publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Balázs Deák sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 165 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Balázs Deák D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Balázs Deák sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Balázs Deák is affiliated with the University of Debrecen in Hungary and specializes in Environmental Science and Agricultural and Biological Sciences. Their work spans multiple subfields including Nature and Landscape Conservation, Ecology, Plant Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, and Global and Planetary Change.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Botany and Plant Ecology Studies
  • Plant and animal studies
  • Rangeland and Wildlife Management
  • Rangeland Management and Livestock Ecology
  • Species Distribution and Climate Change
  • Peatlands and Wetlands Ecology

Deák has contributed to several recent papers, some of which are:

  • Linking environmental heterogeneity and plant diversity: The ecological role of small natural features in homogeneous landscapes, 2020, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Benchmarking plant diversity of Palaearctic grasslands and other open habitats, 2021, Journal of Vegetation Science
  • Public attitudes toward biodiversity-friendly greenspace management in Europe, 2020, Conservation Letters
  • Drivers of seedling establishment success in dryland restoration efforts, 2021, Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • Grazing and ecosystem service delivery in global drylands, 2022, Science

The frequent publication venues for Deák include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Journal of Environmental Management
  • Journal of Vegetation Science
  • Global Ecology and Conservation

Collaboration is a notable aspect of Deák's research. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Orsolya Valkó
  • Réka Kiss
  • Laura Godó
  • Péter Török
  • András Kelemen

Best Publications

  • Grassland restoration on former croplands in Europe: an assessment of applicability of techniques and costs

    Péter Török;Enikő Vida;Balázs Deák;Szabolcs Lengyel

  • Grazing vs. mowing: A meta-analysis of biodiversity benefits for grassland management

    Malin Tälle;Balázs Deák;Peter Poschlod;Orsolya Valkó

  • Grazing and ecosystem service delivery in global drylands

    Unknown

  • Drivers of seedling establishment success in dryland restoration efforts.

    Nancy Shackelford;Nancy Shackelford;Gustavo B. Paterno;Gustavo B. Paterno;Daniel E. Winkler;Todd E. Erickson

  • Livestock Type is More Crucial Than Grazing Intensity: Traditional Cattle and Sheep Grazing in Short‐Grass Steppes

    Edina Tóth;Balázs Deák;Orsolya Valkó;András Kelemen

  • Review: Prospects and limitations of prescribed burning as a management tool in European grasslands

    Orsolya Valkó;Péter Török;Balázs Deák;Béla Tóthmérész

  • Restoring grassland biodiversity: Sowing low-diversity seed mixtures can lead to rapid favourable changes

    Péter Török;Balázs Deák;Enikő Vida;Orsolya Valkó

  • Cultural monuments and nature conservation: a review of the role of kurgans in the conservation and restoration of steppe vegetation

    Balázs Deák;Béla Tóthmérész;Orsolya Valkó;Barbara Sudnik-Wójcikowska

  • Classification of Herbaceous Vegetation Using Airborne Hyperspectral Imagery

    Péter Burai;Balázs Deák;Orsolya Valkó;Tamás Tomor

  • Traditional Cattle Grazing in a Mosaic Alkali Landscape: Effects on Grassland Biodiversity along a Moisture Gradient

    Péter Török;Orsolya Valkó;Balázs Deák;András Kelemen

  • Mapping an ecological network of green habitat patches and their role in maintaining urban biodiversity in and around Debrecen city (Eastern Hungary)

    Bernadett Hüse;Szilárd Szabó;Balázs Deák;Béla Tóthmérész

  • Public attitudes toward biodiversity-friendly greenspace management in Europe

    Leonie K. Fischer;Leonie K. Fischer;Lena Neuenkamp;Lena Neuenkamp;Jussi Lampinen;Maria Tuomi

  • Supporting biodiversity by prescribed burning in grasslands — A multi-taxa approach

    Orsolya Valkó;Balázs Deák;Tibor Magura;Péter Török

  • Secondary succession in sandy old-fields: a promising example of spontaneous grassland recovery

    Ágnes Júlia Albert;András Kelemen;Orsolya Valkó;Tamás Miglécz

  • Linking environmental heterogeneity and plant diversity: The ecological role of small natural features in homogeneous landscapes.

    Balázs Deák;Bence Kovács;Zoltán Rádai;Iva Apostolova

  • Categorizing Grassland Vegetation with Full-Waveform Airborne Laser Scanning: A Feasibility Study for Detecting Natura 2000 Habitat Types

    András Zlinszky;András Zlinszky;Anke Schroiff;Adam Kania;Balázs Deák

  • Micro-topographic heterogeneity increases plant diversity in old stages of restored grasslands

    Balázs Deák;Orsolya Valkó;Péter Török;András Kelemen

  • Litter and graminoid biomass accumulation suppresses weedy forbs in grassland restoration

    B. Deák;O. Valkó;A. Kelemen;P. Török

  • Fine-scale vertical position as an indicator of vegetation in alkali grasslands – Case study based on remotely sensed data

    Balázs Deák;Orsolya Valkó;Cici Alexander;Werner Mücke

  • Lucerne‐dominated fields recover native grass diversity without intensive management actions

    Péter Török;András Kelemen;Orsolya Valkó;Balázs Deák

  • Factors threatening grassland specialist plants - A multi-proxy study on the vegetation of isolated grasslands

    Balázs Deák;Orsolya Valkó;Péter Török;Béla Tóthmérész

  • Grassland seed bank and community resilience in a changing climate

    Réka Kiss;Balázs Deák;Péter Török;Béla Tóthmérész

  • Recovery of native grass biodiversity by sowing on former croplands: Is weed suppression a feasible goal for grassland restoration?

    Péter Török;Tamás Miglécz;Orsolya Valkó;András Kelemen

  • Managing for species composition or diversity? Pastoral and free grazing systems in alkali steppes

    Péter Török;Orsolya Valkó;Balázs Deák;András Kelemen

Frequent Co-Authors

Orsolya Valkó
Orsolya Valkó University of Debrecen
Béla Tóthmérész
Béla Tóthmérész University of Debrecen
Péter Török
Péter Török University of Debrecen
Tibor Magura
Tibor Magura University of Debrecen
Steffen Boch
Steffen Boch Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Valentin H. Klaus
Valentin H. Klaus Ruhr University Bochum
Jürgen Dengler
Jürgen Dengler Zurich University of Applied Sciences
Per Milberg
Per Milberg Linköping University
Peter Poschlod
Peter Poschlod University of Regensburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Whether you’re passionate about Ecology and Evolution or exploring complementary fields, there are a variety of online degrees and career pathways to consider. Many students broaden their scientific background with accredited programs that prepare them for jobs in healthcare, research, and education.

For example, aspiring speech-language pathologists can enroll in asha approved slp programs that meet strict industry standards—enabling graduates to qualify for clinical certification. If your undergraduate degree isn’t in communication sciences, you may be interested in speech language pathology bridge programs online, which provide the necessary prerequisites for entry into SLP master’s programs.

Those looking to pivot into nursing may benefit from accelerated bsn programs for non nurses, allowing individuals from non-nursing backgrounds to earn a nursing degree rapidly. For further specialization, roles such as psychiatric mental health nurse practitioners offer strong employment prospects and competitive salaries. Check out the latest information on psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner salary by state to guide your career planning.

Best Scientists Citing Balázs Deák

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles