World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
71
Citations
20080
World Ranking
6582
National Ranking
3066

Sarah L. Booth publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah L. Booth sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 252 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Sarah L. Booth D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Sarah L. Booth sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Sarah L. Booth is affiliated with Tufts University in the United States and has an extensive research portfolio primarily in the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to Nursing. Their work predominantly focuses on Nutrition and Dietetics, along with areas such as Physiology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Molecular Biology, and Neurology.

The main research topics covered by Booth include:

  • Vitamin K Research Studies
  • Vitamin C and Antioxidants Research
  • Alcoholism and Thiamine Deficiency
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Hormonal Regulation and Hypertension
  • Diet and metabolism studies
  • Renal function and acid-base balance

Booth's recent published papers illustrate a focus on dietary factors and their relationships to cognitive and aging-related health outcomes. Notable publications include:

  • "Dietary flavonols and risk of Alzheimer dementia," 2020, published in Neurology
  • "Dietary vitamin K is remodeled by gut microbiota and influences community composition," 2021, published in Gut Microbes
  • "Healthy Aging-Nutrition Matters: Start Early and Screen Often," 2021, published in Advances in Nutrition
  • "Association of vitamin K with cognitive decline and neuropathology in community-dwelling older persons," 2022, published in Alzheimer's & Dementia Translational Research & Clinical Interventions
  • "Association of Dietary Intake of Flavonols With Changes in Global Cognition and Several Cognitive Abilities," 2022, published in Neurology

The venues where Booth frequently publishes reflect a focus on nutrition and clinical research, including:

  • Current Developments in Nutrition
  • Journal of Nutrition
  • Advances in Nutrition
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Collaboration is a significant aspect of Booth's research, with frequent co-authors comprising:

  • M. Kyla Shea
  • Xueyan Fu
  • Christopher J. Hernandez
  • Thomas Holland
  • Puja Agarwal

This body of work spans interdisciplinary domains combining aspects of medicine, nutrition, molecular biology, and public health that contribute to understanding the complex effects of diet and micronutrients such as vitamin K on aging, cognition, and overall health.

Best Publications

  • Common genetic determinants of vitamin D insufficiency: a genome-wide association study

    Thomas J. Wang;Feng Zhang;J. Brent Richards;Bryan Kestenbaum

  • Environmental and societal factors affect food choice and physical activity: rationale, influences, and leverage points.

    Sarah L. Booth;James F. Sallis;Cheryl Ritenbaugh;James O. Hill

  • Adiposity, Cardiometabolic Risk, and Vitamin D Status: The Framingham Heart Study

    Susan Cheng;Joseph M. Massaro;Joseph M. Massaro;Caroline S. Fox;Caroline S. Fox;Martin G. Larson;Martin G. Larson

  • Vitamin K intake and hip fractures in women: a prospective study

    Diane Feskanich;Peter Weber;Walter C Willett;Helaine Rockett

  • Increases in human plasma antioxidant capacity after consumption of controlled diets high in fruit and vegetables

    Guohua Cao;S. L. Booth;J. A. Sadowski;R. L. Prior

  • Dietary vitamin K intakes are associated with hip fracture but not with bone mineral density in elderly men and women

    S. L. Booth;K. L. Tucker;Honglei Chen;M. T. Hannan

  • Human plasma carotenoid response to the ingestion of controlled diets high in fruits and vegetables.

    K J Yeum;S L Booth;J A Sadowski;C Liu

  • Plasma 25-hydroxyvitamin d is associated with markers of the insulin resistant phenotype in nondiabetic adults

    Enju Liu;James B. Meigs;Anastassios G. Pittas;Nicola M. McKeown

  • Dietary fat consumption and health.

    Alice H. Lichtenstein;Eileen Kennedy;Phyllis Barrier;Darla Danford

  • Vitamin K and Vitamin D Status: Associations with Inflammatory Markers in the Framingham Offspring Study

    M. Kyla Shea;Sarah L. Booth;Joseph M. Massaro;Paul F. Jacques

  • The role of menaquinones (vitamin K 2 ) in human health

    Joline W. J. Beulens;Sarah L. Booth;Ellen G. H. M. van den Heuvel;Elisabeth Stoecklin

  • Vitamin K intake and bone mineral density in women and men

    Sarah L Booth;Kerry E Broe;David R Gagnon;Katherine L Tucker

  • Vitamin K supplementation and progression of coronary artery calcium in older men and women

    M Kyla Shea;Christopher J O'Donnell;Udo Hoffmann;Gerard E Dallal

  • Menaquinones, Bacteria, and the Food Supply: The Relevance of Dairy and Fermented Food Products to Vitamin K Requirements

    Barbara Walther;J. Philip Karl;Sarah L. Booth;Patrick Boyaval

  • The role of osteocalcin in human glucose metabolism: marker or mediator?

    Sarah L. Booth;Amanda Centi;Steven R. Smith;Caren Gundberg

  • Genetic and non-genetic correlates of vitamins K and D

    M K Shea;E J Benjamin;J Dupuis;J M Massaro

  • Predicted 25-hydroxyvitamin D score and incident type 2 diabetes in the Framingham Offspring Study

    Enju Liu;James B Meigs;Anastassios G Pittas;Christina D Economos

  • Vitamins K and D Status in Stages 3–5 Chronic Kidney Disease

    Rachel M. Holden;A. Ross Morton;Jocelyn S. Garland;Andrey Pavlov

  • Nutrients and bioactives in green leafy vegetables and cognitive decline: Prospective study.

    Martha Clare Morris;Yamin Wang;Lisa L. Barnes;David A. Bennett

  • γ-Carboxylation of osteocalcin and insulin resistance in older men and women

    M Kyla Shea;Caren M Gundberg;James B Meigs;Gerard E Dallal

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul F. Jacques
Paul F. Jacques Tufts University
Jose M. Ordovas
Jose M. Ordovas Tufts University
Stephen B. Kritchevsky
Stephen B. Kritchevsky Wake Forest University
Bess Dawson-Hughes
Bess Dawson-Hughes Tufts University
Alice H. Lichtenstein
Alice H. Lichtenstein Tufts University
Thomas J. Wang
Thomas J. Wang Vanderbilt University
Richard F. Loeser
Richard F. Loeser University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Douglas P. Kiel
Douglas P. Kiel Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Josée Dupuis
Josée Dupuis McGill University
Michael A. Grusak
Michael A. Grusak Agricultural Research Service

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens the door to a wide variety of advanced degrees and healthcare career pathways. Many students continue into specialized graduate programs to expand their expertise and boost their job prospects.

Aspiring healthcare administrators can explore cahme accreditation for mha programs, ensuring their Master of Healthcare Administration degree meets high-quality standards. For those aiming at high-level leadership, the best doctorate of healthcare administration programs offer advanced knowledge and open doors to executive positions.

Clinical experience isn’t always required for every advanced degree. Some programs, like dnp program no clinical, allow nursing professionals to further their education fully online and without on-site requirements.

Lastly, those interested in pharmaceutical sciences can advance with an online pharmd degree, preparing graduates for leadership and clinical roles in pharmacy.

Best Scientists Citing Sarah L. Booth

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles