World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
54
Citations
11158
World Ranking
3129
National Ranking
246

Hedley S. Grantham publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hedley S. Grantham sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 123 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Hedley S. Grantham D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hedley S. Grantham sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Hedley S. Grantham is affiliated with the University of New South Wales in Australia and has contributed extensively to the field of Environmental Science. Their research encompasses multiple subfields, including Global and Planetary Change, Ecology, Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law, Ecological Modeling, and Economics and Econometrics.

They focus primarily on topics related to Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management, with additional work covering Land Use and Ecosystem Services, Species Distribution and Climate Change, Environmental Conservation and Management, Coastal Wetland Ecosystem Dynamics, Economic and Environmental Valuation, and Coastal and Marine Management.

Grantham has coauthored frequently with several researchers including James Watson, Oscar Venter, Brooke Williams, Nicholas Murray, and Kendall R. Jones.

Their publications appear regularly in journals such as bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Conservation Letters, Conservation Biology, Nature Communications, and One Earth.

Among their recent papers are:

  • Anthropogenic modification of forests means only 40% of remaining forests have high ecosystem integrity, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Change in Terrestrial Human Footprint Drives Continued Loss of Intact Ecosystems, 2020, One Earth
  • Scientific foundations for an ecosystem goal, milestones and indicators for the post-2020 global biodiversity framework, 2021, Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • Global rarity of intact coastal regions, 2021, Conservation Biology
  • Reconciling global priorities for conserving biodiversity habitat, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Best Publications

  • The exceptional value of intact forest ecosystems

    James E. M. Watson;James E. M. Watson;Tom Evans;Oscar Venter;Brooke Williams;Brooke Williams

  • Is conservation triage just smart decision making

    Madeleine C Bottrill;Liana N Joseph;Josie Carwardine;Michael Bode

  • Tradeoffs of different types of species occurrence data for use in systematic conservation planning.

    Carlo Rondinini;Kerrie A. Wilson;Luigi Boitani;Hedley Grantham

  • Pelagic protected areas: the missing dimension in ocean conservation

    Edward T. Game;Edward T. Game;Hedley S. Grantham;Alistair J. Hobday;Robert L. Pressey

  • Modification of forests by people means only 40% of remaining forests have high ecosystem integrity

    H.S. Grantham;A. Duncan;T. Evans;K.R. Jones

  • Achieving the triple bottom line in the face of inherent trade-offs among social equity, economic return, and conservation

    Benjamin S. Halpern;Carissa J. Klein;Christopher J. Brown;Maria Beger

  • Change in Terrestrial Human Footprint Drives Continued Loss of Intact Ecosystems

    Brooke A. Williams;Oscar Venter;James R. Allan;Scott C. Atkinson;Scott C. Atkinson

  • Conservation planning for connectivity across marine, freshwater, and terrestrial realms

    Maria Beger;Hedley S. Grantham;Robert L. Pressey;Robert L. Pressey;Kerrie A. Wilson

  • Replacing underperforming protected areas achieves better conservation outcomes

    Richard A. Fuller;Richard A. Fuller;Eve McDonald-Madden;Eve McDonald-Madden;Kerrie A. Wilson;Josie Carwardine;Josie Carwardine

  • The Location and Protection Status of Earth’s Diminishing Marine Wilderness

    Kendall R. Jones;Kendall R. Jones;Carissa J. Klein;Benjamin S. Halpern;Benjamin S. Halpern;Oscar Venter

  • Between-country collaboration and consideration of costs increase conservation planning efficiency in the Mediterranean Basin

    Salit Kark;Noam Levin;Hedley S. Grantham;Hugh P. Possingham

  • An integrative research framework for enabling transformative adaptation

    Matthew J. Colloff;Matthew J. Colloff;Berta Martín-López;Sandra Lavorel;Bruno Locatelli

  • Delaying conservation actions for improved knowledge: how long should we wait?

    Hedley S. Grantham;Kerrie A. Wilson;Atte Moilanen;Tony Rebelo

  • Effectiveness of Biodiversity Surrogates for Conservation Planning: Different Measures of Effectiveness Generate a Kaleidoscope of Variation

    Hedley S. Grantham;Robert L. Pressey;Jessie A. Wells;Andrew J. Beattie

  • Scientific foundations for an ecosystem goal, milestones and indicators for the post-2020 global biodiversity framework.

    Emily Nicholson;Emily Nicholson;Kate E. Watermeyer;Jessica A. Rowland;Chloe F. Sato

  • The global rarity of intact coastal regions

    Unknown

  • Diminishing return on investment for biodiversity data in conservation planning

    Hedley S. Grantham;Atte Moilanen;Kerrie A. Wilson;Kerrie A. Wilson;Robert L. Pressey;Robert L. Pressey

  • Conserving biodiversity in production landscapes

    K. A. Wilson;E. Meijaard;S. Drummond;H. S. Grantham

  • Effective conservation planning requires learning and adaptation

    Hedley S Grantham;Michael Bode;Eve McDonald-Madden;Edward T Game

  • Degradation and forgone removals increase the carbon impact of intact forest loss by 626.

    Sean L. Maxwell;Sean L. Maxwell;Tom Evans;James E. M. Watson;James E. M. Watson;Alexandra Morel;Alexandra Morel

  • Finite conservation funds mean triage is unavoidable

    Madeleine C Bottrill;Liana N Joseph;Josie Carwardine;Michael Bode

  • Systematic Conservation Planning: Past, Present and Future

    James E. M. Watson;Hedley S. Grantham;Kerrie A. Wilson;Hugh P. Possingham

  • Anthropogenic modification of forests means only 40% of remaining forests have high ecosystem integrity

    H. S. Grantham;A. Duncan;T. D. Evans;K. R. Jones

Frequent Co-Authors

Hugh P. Possingham
Hugh P. Possingham University of Queensland
James E. M. Watson
James E. M. Watson University of Queensland
Kerrie A. Wilson
Kerrie A. Wilson Queensland University of Technology
Oscar Venter
Oscar Venter University of Northern British Columbia
Robert L. Pressey
Robert L. Pressey James Cook University
Edward T. Game
Edward T. Game The Nature Conservancy
Carissa J. Klein
Carissa J. Klein University of Queensland
Benjamin S. Halpern
Benjamin S. Halpern University of California, Santa Barbara
Ayesha I. T. Tulloch
Ayesha I. T. Tulloch University of Sydney
Anthony J. Richardson
Anthony J. Richardson University of Queensland

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Ecology and Evolution can open doors to diverse roles in research, education, and healthcare. If you’re considering expanding your science background, nursing programs offer flexible paths with strong job growth and competitive salaries.

For example, bridging your current credentials with an ADN to MSN track makes it possible for registered nurses to advance their education and qualify for leadership or specialized roles. Curious about time commitment? Learn more about how long does it take to be a nurse practitioner and find programs that match your pace.

Fast-track options, like the fastest rn to bsn program, allow you to upskill in as little as six months. Consider advancing to a nurse practitioner role through various rn to np programs, which blend online flexibility with hands-on experience.

Interested in compensation? The dnp psychiatric nurse practitioner salary highlights impressive earnings, especially for those with advanced degrees. Combining your interest in science with healthcare can create rewarding career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Hedley S. Grantham

Trending Scientists