World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
24815
World Ranking
16111
National Ranking
1479

Martyn J. Parker publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martyn J. Parker sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 289 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Martyn J. Parker D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martyn J. Parker sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Martyn J. Parker is affiliated with Peterborough City Hospital in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on medicine, with a strong emphasis on surgery. Within this broader field, their work extensively covers subfields such as surgery, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, ocean engineering, emergency medicine, and orthopedics and sports medicine.

The main topics of their research portfolio include hip and femur fractures, cardiac, anesthesia and surgical outcomes, pelvic and acetabular injuries, orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty, trauma and emergency care studies, total knee arthroplasty outcomes, and bone and joint diseases.

Martyn J. Parker has contributed to several scientific publications, with notable papers including:

  • Cemented versus uncemented hemiarthroplasty for displaced intracapsular fractures of the hip (2023, The Bone & Joint Journal)
  • Cephalomedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in older adults (2022, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews)
  • Mortality following hip fracture: Trends and geographical variations over the last SIXTY years (2022, Injury)
  • Surgical interventions for treating extracapsular hip fractures in older adults: a network meta-analysis (2022, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews)
  • Characteristics and outcomes of hip fractures in lower limb amputees (2020, Injury)

Their frequent coauthors include Shirley Cawley, Xavier L Griffin, Senthooran Kanthasamy, Sharon R Lewis, and Richard Macey. Collaboration with these researchers reflects ongoing joint efforts in clinical investigations and reviews related to orthopaedic surgery and trauma care.

Martyn J. Parker has published in various scientific venues, with multiple contributions to:

  • Injury
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • The Bone & Joint Journal
  • European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
  • SPE/IADC Managed Pressure Drilling and Underbalanced Operations Conference and Exhibition

Their body of work includes a total of 73 publications in medicine, with 50 specifically addressing surgical topics. This combination of clinical focus and detailed systematic reviews indicates an emphasis on evidence-based treatment approaches in orthopaedics and trauma surgery.

Best Publications

  • Mortality and morbidity after hip fractures.

    G S Keene;M J Parker;G A Pryor

  • A new mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture

    Martyn J. Parker;Christopher R. Palmer

  • Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults

    Martyn J Parker;Helen H G Handoll

  • Treatment of Acute Achilles Tendon Ruptures. A Meta-Analysis of Randomized, Controlled Trials

    Riaz J.K. Khan;Dan Fick;Angus Keogh;John Crawford

  • Arthroplasties (with and without bone cement) for proximal femoral fractures in adults

    Martyn J Parker;Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy;Shin Azegami

  • Anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery in adults

    Joanne Guay;Martyn J Parker;Pushpaj R Gajendragadkar;Sandra Kopp

  • Mortality following hip fracture: trends and geographical variations over the last 40 years.

    S. Haleem;L. Lutchman;R. Mayahi;J.E. Grice

  • General versus regional anaesthesia for hip fracture surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

    S C Urwin;M J Parker;R Griffiths

  • Timing of surgery for hip fractures: a systematic review of 52 published studies involving 291,413 patients.

    Sameer K. Khan;Sanjay Kalra;Anil Khanna;Madhan M. Thiruvengada

  • Closed suction surgical wound drainage after orthopaedic surgery.

    Martyn J Parker;Chris P Roberts

  • Differences in mortality after fracture of hip: the east Anglian audit.

    C J Todd;C J Freeman;C Camilleri-Ferrante;C R Palmer

  • Closed suction drainage for hip and knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis.

    Martyn J. Parker;Chris P. Roberts;Douglas Hay

  • Delay to surgery prolongs hospital stay in patients with fractures of the proximal femur

    A. W. Siegmeth;K. Gurusamy;M. J. Parker

  • Internal fixation versus arthroplasty for intracapsular proximal femoral fractures in adults.

    Martyn J Parker;Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy

  • Effectiveness of hip protectors for preventing hip fractures in elderly people: systematic review

    Martyn J Parker;William J Gillespie;Lesley D Gillespie

  • Accelerated surgery versus standard care in hip fracture (HIP ATTACK): an international, randomised, controlled trial

    Flavia K Borges;Mohit Bhandari;Ernesto Guerra-Farfan;Ameen Patel

  • Hip protectors for preventing hip fractures in older people

    William J Gillespie;Lesley D Gillespie;Martyn J Parker

  • Hemiarthroplasty versus internal fixation for displaced intracapsular hip fractures in the elderly. A randomised trial of 455 patients.

    M. J. Parker;R. J. K. Khan;J. Crawford;G. A. Pryor

  • Hip protectors for preventing hip fractures in the elderly

    MJ Parker;LD Gillespie;WJ Gillespie

  • Management of proximal femoral fractures 2011: Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

    R Griffiths;J Alper;A Beckingsale;D Goldhill

Frequent Co-Authors

Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy
Kurinchi Selvan Gurusamy University College London
J S Reeve
J S Reeve University of Oxford
Chris Todd
Chris Todd University of Manchester
Heikki Kröger
Heikki Kröger University of Eastern Finland
Mohit Bhandari
Mohit Bhandari McMaster University
Catherine Sherrington
Catherine Sherrington University of Sydney
Paul Tornetta
Paul Tornetta Boston Medical Center
James G. Wright
James G. Wright University of Toronto
Simon J. Stanworth
Simon J. Stanworth NHS Blood and Transplant
Shrikant I. Bangdiwala
Shrikant I. Bangdiwala McMaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to a variety of related healthcare degrees and careers, many of which can be started online. For those with a non-nursing background seeking a fast track into advanced practice, direct entry msn programs offer a streamlined path to become a nurse practitioner or clinical leader, even without previous nursing experience.

Entry requirements for nursing programs vary widely. If you're looking for options with less competitive admissions, exploring what is the easiest nursing program to get into can help identify schools that are more accessible, letting you launch your career sooner.

Not all healthcare roles require direct patient care. Administrative fields like medical billing and coding offer flexible, in-demand opportunities, many of which can be completed online. Explore online medical billing and coding schools that accept fafsa for programs eligible for financial aid.

For those deterred by standardized entrance exams, you can find nursing programs without teas requirements, making application and enrollment more accessible. Each of these pathways can provide a strong foundation for a rewarding healthcare career or a stepping stone to medical school.

Best Scientists Citing Martyn J. Parker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles