World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 87 13688 12882 6951 6430 689 26705

Kenneth A. Egol publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kenneth A. Egol between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kenneth A. Egol published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 24.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 71 publications in 2021. 55 of the 716 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 71. Peak 71 publications in 2021. 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 5 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 20 publications 2005: 19 publications 2006: 29 publications 2007: 20 publications 2008: 18 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 36 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 31 publications 2015: 38 publications 2016: 30 publications 2017: 47 publications 2018: 30 publications 2019: 45 publications 2020: 35 publications 2021: 71 publications 2022: 39 publications 2023: 37 publications 2024: 29 publications 2025: 26 publications
1997 2025

716 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kenneth A. Egol: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 2
1998 2
1999 1
2000 5
2001 5
2002 11
2003 7
2004 20
2005 19
2006 29
2007 20
2008 18
2009 21
2010 18
2011 19
2012 36
2013 25
2014 31
2015 38
2016 30
2017 47
2018 30
2019 45
2020 35
2021 71
2022 39
2023 37
2024 29
2025 26
Total 716
Download as CSV

Kenneth A. Egol publications per year - data summary

  • Kenneth A. Egol, a Medicine scholar from New York University, has 716 publications recorded across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1997 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2021, with 71 publications.
  • The least productive year with any output is 1999, with 1 publication.
  • The rate of publication averages 24.7 papers per year over the whole span, or 24.7 per year counting only the 29 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 202 publications, 28% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1997-2006: 101 publications (10.1 per year); 2007-2016: 256 publications (25.6 per year); 2017-2025: 359 publications (39.9 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Kenneth A. Egol publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth A. Egol sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 681–700 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 689 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336 689
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Kenneth A. Egol publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Kenneth A. Egol, a Medicine scholar from New York University, records 689 publications - the 80th percentile of the discipline.
  • 80% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Kenneth A. Egol, and about 20% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Kenneth A. Egol ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Kenneth A. Egol D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth A. Egol sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960 87
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Kenneth A. Egol D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Kenneth A. Egol, a Medicine scholar from New York University, records 87 D-Index - the 34th percentile of the discipline.
  • 34% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Kenneth A. Egol, and about 66% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Kenneth A. Egol ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Kenneth A. Egol is affiliated with New York University in the United States and specializes primarily in medicine, with a concentrated focus on surgery. Their scholarly contributions cover several interconnected subfields, including surgery, epidemiology, emergency medicine, orthopedics and sports medicine, and cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. This multidisciplinary approach demonstrates engagement with both clinical and research aspects of patient care and medical outcomes.

The scientist's research predominantly addresses topics related to bone and joint injuries and treatments, with a notable emphasis on hip and femur fractures. Other major topics include orthopedic surgery and rehabilitation, pelvic and acetabular injuries, shoulder injury and treatment, trauma and emergency care studies, as well as cardiac, anesthesia, and surgical outcomes.

Recent publications reflect this focus, with several papers published in recognized orthopaedic and trauma-related journals. Key papers include:

  • Increased Mortality and Major Complications in Hip Fracture Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A New York City Perspective (2020) - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
  • Musculoskeletal Infection in Orthopaedic Trauma (2020) - Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
  • Distal Radius Fracture Clinical Practice Guidelines-Updates and Clinical Implications (2021) - The Journal Of Hand Surgery
  • Modification of a Validated Risk Stratification Tool to Characterize Geriatric Hip Fracture Outcomes and Optimize Care in a Post-COVID-19 World (2020) - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
  • Declining Medicare Reimbursement in Orthopaedic Trauma Surgery: 2000-2020 (2020) - Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

These works have been disseminated primarily through specialized venues. The most frequent publication venues for Kenneth A. Egol include:

  • Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
  • European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
  • Injury
  • Geriatric Orthopaedic Surgery & Rehabilitation
  • Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Collaborations are a significant aspect of Kenneth A. Egol's research activity. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Sanjit R. Konda
  • Abhishek Ganta
  • Philipp Leucht
  • Garrett W. Esper
  • Sara Solasz

The broad scope of their work encompasses clinical practice guidelines, epidemiological impacts on orthopedic trauma care, and healthcare system factors such as reimbursement trends. This varied focus underscores a blend of direct patient care insights with policy and systemic considerations relevant to orthopaedic trauma and surgery.

Best Publications

  • Biomechanics of locked plates and screws.

    Kenneth A. Egol;Erik N. Kubiak;Eric Fulkerson;Frederick J. Kummer

  • Handbook Of Fractures

    Kenneth A. Egol;Kenneth J. Koval;Joseph D. Zuckerman

  • Staged management of high-energy proximal tibia fractures (OTA types 41): the results of a prospective, standardized protocol.

    Kenneth A Egol;Nirmal C Tejwani;Edward L Capla;Philip L Wolinsky

  • Surgical management of hip fractures: an evidence-based review of the literature. I: femoral neck fractures.

    Ryan G. Miyamoto;Kevin M. Kaplan;Brett R. Levine;Kenneth A. Egol

  • Early Complications in Proximal Humerus Fractures (OTA Types 11) Treated With Locked Plates

    Kenneth A Egol;Crispin C Ong;Michael Walsh;Laith M Jazrawi

  • Surgical management of hip fractures: an evidence-based review of the literature. II: intertrochanteric fractures.

    Kevin Kaplan;Ryan Miyamoto;Brett R. Levine;Kenneth A. Egol

  • Gender differences in patients with hip fracture: a greater risk of morbidity and mortality in men.

    Yoshimi Endo;Gina B Aharonoff;Joseph D Zuckerman;Kenneth A Egol

  • The relationship between admission hemoglobin level and outcome after hip fracture.

    Konrad I. Gruson;Gina B. Aharonoff;Kenneth A. Egol;Joseph D. Zuckerman

  • Intramedullary nailing of the lower extremity: biomechanics and biology.

    Matthew R. Bong;Frederick J. Kummer;Kenneth J. Koval;Kenneth A. Egol

  • The evolution of locked plates.

    Erik N. Kubiak;Eric Fulkerson;Eric Strauss;Kenneth A. Egol

  • Distal radial fractures in the elderly: operative compared with nonoperative treatment.

    K A Egol;M Walsh;S Romo-Cardoso;Seth Dorsky

  • Hip fracture management: tailoring care for the older patient.

    William W. Hung;Kenneth A. Egol;Joseph D. Zuckerman;Albert L. Siu

  • Predictors of short-term functional outcome following ankle fracture surgery.

    Kenneth A. Egol;Nirmal C. Tejwani;Michael G. Walsh;Edward L. Capla

  • Outcome after unstable ankle fracture: effect of syndesmotic stabilization.

    Kenneth A Egol;Brian Pahk;Michael Walsh;Nirmal C Tejwani

  • Fixation of diaphyseal fractures with a segmental defect: a biomechanical comparison of locked and conventional plating techniques.

    Eric Fulkerson;Kenneth A. Egol;Erik N. Kubiak;Frank Liporace

  • Stress fractures of the femoral neck.

    Kenneth A. Egol;Kenneth J. Koval;Frederick Kummer;Victor H. Frankel

  • Treatment of Complex Tibial Plateau Fractures Using the Less Invasive Stabilization System Plate: Clinical Experience and a Laboratory Comparison with Double Plating

    Kenneth A. Egol;Edward Su;Nirmal C. Tejwani;Stephen H. Sims

  • Periprosthetic fractures after total knee arthroplasties.

    Kang-Il Kim;Kenneth A Egol;William J Hozack;Javad Parvizi

  • The Floating Shoulder: Clinical and Functional Results

    Kenneth A. Egol;Patrick M. Connor;Madhav A. Karunakar;Stephen H. Sims

  • 2018 International Consensus Meeting on Musculoskeletal Infection: Research Priorities from the General Assembly Questions

    Edward M Schwarz;Javad Parvizi;Thorsten Gehrke;Amiethab Aiyer

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth J. Koval
Kenneth J. Koval New York University
Joseph D. Zuckerman
Joseph D. Zuckerman New York University
Michael Walsh
Michael Walsh Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Frederick J. Kummer
Frederick J. Kummer New York University
Paul Tornetta
Paul Tornetta Boston Medical Center
Mohit Bhandari
Mohit Bhandari McMaster University
Chuan-ju Liu
Chuan-ju Liu New York University
Emil H. Schemitsch
Emil H. Schemitsch University of Western Ontario
David Ring
David Ring The University of Texas at Austin
Punam K. Saha
Punam K. Saha University of Iowa

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Interested in launching or advancing your healthcare career beyond studying Medicine in the USA? There are a variety of flexible online degree options tailored to different goals and backgrounds. Many students begin with nursing credentials, as these are highly in demand and allow for growth in the medical field.

For those seeking an affordable path, there are cheapest fnp programs that prepare you to become a Family Nurse Practitioner, opening doors to primary care roles. If you’re looking to become a registered nurse, consider these affordable online nursing programs, which offer foundational preparation with budget-friendly tuition.

Already an RN and looking to level up? Check out the cheapest online bsn programs designed for working professionals aiming for greater responsibility and earning potential. If your goal is to teach or lead in healthcare, a doctoral degree could be for you. There are flexible doctorate in nursing education online programs for advanced clinical or academic careers.

These pathways make it possible to build a rewarding healthcare career—on your own schedule and often at a lower cost.

Best Scientists Citing Kenneth A. Egol

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles