World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
22520
World Ranking
16222
National Ranking
8157

Nabil A. Ebraheim publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nabil A. Ebraheim sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 584 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Nabil A. Ebraheim D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nabil A. Ebraheim sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nabil A. Ebraheim is affiliated with the University of Toledo in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Medicine, encompassing 89 published works. Key subfields include Surgery, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Epidemiology, Rehabilitation, and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging.

The scientist's research topics include:

  • Shoulder Injury and Treatment
  • Orthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
  • Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
  • Foot and Ankle Surgery
  • Tendon Structure and Treatment
  • Shoulder and Clavicle Injuries
  • Bone fractures and treatments

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated on multiple publications with this scientist are:

  • Jiayong Liu
  • Phillip J. Stokey
  • Anderson Lee
  • Kyle Behrens
  • Sreeram Ravi

Their work has been published in a range of orthopedic and medical journals, including:

  • Journal of Orthopaedics
  • Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports
  • Advances in Orthopedics
  • Orthopedic Reviews
  • Journal of Orthopaedic Reports

Notable recent papers include:

  • Managements of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A narrative review (2022, World Journal of Orthopedics)
  • Biomechanical comparison of suture-button, bioabsorbable screw, and metal screw for ankle syndesmotic repair: A meta-analysis (2020, Foot and Ankle Surgery)
  • Sacroiliitis: A Review on Anatomy, Diagnosis, and Treatment (2022, Advances in Orthopedics)
  • Injections for treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: A narrative review of the literature (2023, Journal of Orthopaedics)
  • Teres minor and quadrilateral space syndrome: A review (2020, Journal of Orthopaedics)

Best Publications

  • Radiographic and CT Evaluation of Tibiofibular Syndesmotic Diastasis: A Cadaver Study

    Nabil A. Ebraheim;Jike Lu;Hua Yang;Anis O. Mekhail

  • Pathomechanism of Ligamentum Flavum Hypertrophy: A Multidisciplinary Investigation Based on Clinical, Biomechanical, Histologic, and Biologic Assessments

    Koichi Sairyo;Ashok Biyani;Vijay Goel;Douglas Leaman

  • Biomechanical Rationale for Using Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Spacers for Lumbar Interbody fusion-A Finite Element Study

    Sasidhar Vadapalli;Koichi Sairyo;Vijay K Goel;Matt Robon

  • Compartment syndrome in open tibial fractures.

    S. S. Blick;R. J. Brumback;A. Poka;Andrew R Burgess

  • An overview of recent advances in designing orthopedic and craniofacial implants.

    Venkata P. Mantripragada;Beata Lecka-Czernik;Nabil A. Ebraheim;Ambalangodage C. Jayasuriya

  • Bone-graft harvesting from iliac and fibular donor sites: techniques and complications.

    Nabil A. Ebraheim;Hossein Elgafy;Rongming Xu

  • Anatomic considerations of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine : Roy-Camille technique versus open-lamina technique

    Rongming Xu;Nabil A. Ebraheim;Yianjia Ou;Richard A. Yeasting

  • Fractures of the talus: experience of two level 1 trauma centers.

    Hossein Elgafy;Nabil A. Ebraheim;Marvin Tile;David Stephen

  • Anatomic consideration of C2 pedicle screw placement.

    Ebraheim N;Rollins;Xu R;Jackson Wt

  • Anatomic relations of the thoracic pedicle to the adjacent neural structures.

    Nabil A. Ebraheim;Georges Jabaly;Rongming Xu;Richard A. Yeasting

  • Lumbar fusion leads to increases in angular motion and stress across sacroiliac joint: a finite element study.

    Alexander A. Ivanov;Ali Kiapour;Nabil A. Ebraheim;Vijay Goel

  • Morphometric evaluation of lower cervical pedicle and its projection.

    Nabil A. Ebraheim;Rongming Xu;Thomas Knight;Richard A. Yeasting

  • Computed tomography of normal distal tibiofibular syndesmosis

    Hossein Elgafy;Hassan B. Semaan;Brian Blessinger;Andrew Wassef

  • MRI signal changes of the pedicle as an indicator for early diagnosis of spondylolysis in children and adolescents: a clinical and biomechanical study.

    Koichi Sairyo;Shinsuke Katoh;Yoichiro Takata;Tomoya Terai

  • Lumbar ligamentum flavum hypertrophy is due to accumulation of inflammation-related scar tissue.

    Koichi Sairyo;Ashok Biyani;Vijay K. Goel;Douglas W. Leaman

  • Anatomic relations between the lumbar pedicle and the adjacent neural structures.

    Nabil A. Ebraheim;Rongming Xu;Maamun Darwich;Richard A. Yeasting

  • Projection of the thoracic pedicle and its morphometric analysis.

    Nabil A. Ebraheim;Rongming Xu;Muhammad Ahmad;Richard A. Yeasting

  • Morphology of the second cervical vertebra and the posterior projection of the C2 pedicle axis.

    Rongming Xu;Matthew C. Nadaud;Nabil A. Ebraheim;Richard A. Yeasting

  • Prospective Review of Mesenchymal Stem Cells Differentiation into Osteoblasts

    Priyanka Garg;Matthew M Mazur;Amy C Buck;Meghan E Wandtke

  • Cervical stabilization by plate and bone fusion.

    Jeffrey A. Brown;Paul Havel;Nabil Ebraheim;Samuel H. Greenblatt

Frequent Co-Authors

Vijay K. Goel
Vijay K. Goel University of Toledo
Howard S. An
Howard S. An Rush University Medical Center
Robert E. Booth
Robert E. Booth University of Colorado Denver
Nader G. Abraham
Nader G. Abraham New York Medical College
Steven R. Garfin
Steven R. Garfin University of California, San Diego
Alexander R. Vaccaro
Alexander R. Vaccaro Thomas Jefferson University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Medicine in the USA opens doors to diverse and rewarding career pathways. With the evolving landscape of healthcare, there is growing demand for specialized and administrative professionals. Many students now pursue related online degrees that offer flexibility and affordability.

For those interested in leadership roles, affordable online mha programs are a popular choice, providing essential management skills for the healthcare sector. If your passion is advanced practice nursing, you might consider one of the best online dnp programs to enhance your clinical expertise.

Pharmacists seeking to advance their qualifications can explore pharm d online programs for flexible, high-level training. Additionally, technology and data management play crucial roles in modern healthcare. Earning your credential through rhit programs online can open up opportunities in health information management.

Exploring these online programs can expand your career options and help you find a pathway that fits your skills and goals in the growing healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Nabil A. Ebraheim

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles