World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Frederick J. Kummer

Frederick J. Kummer

Frederick J. Kummer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick J. Kummer sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Frederick J. Kummer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick J. Kummer sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frederick J. Kummer is affiliated with New York University in the United States. Their academic profile reflects a focus on research and contributions associated with this institution.

The available data does not include specific details about Frederick J. Kummer's recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues. There is no information on the scientist's main fields or subfields of study, nor are there details on the primary topics of their work. Similarly, no book publications or awards have been documented for this researcher.

This profile is based on the available institutional association and lacks additional specifics on research outputs or thematic specializations. The absence of data related to publications, coauthors, or areas of study indicates either a limited public footprint in accessible academic databases or an incomplete source record.

Best Publications

  • Biomechanics of locked plates and screws.

    Kenneth A. Egol;Erik N. Kubiak;Eric Fulkerson;Frederick J. Kummer

  • Helical blade versus sliding hip screw for treatment of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures: a biomechanical evaluation.

    Eric Strauss;Joshua Frank;Jason Lee;Frederick J. Kummer

  • A biomechanical evaluation of the Gamma nail

    Rosenblum Sf;Zuckerman Jd;Kummer Fj;Tam Bs

  • The use of an injectable, biodegradable calcium phosphate bone substitute for the prophylactic augmentation of osteoporotic vertebrae and the management of vertebral compression fractures.

    Bo Bai;Laith M. Jazrawi;Frederick J. Kummer;Jeffrey M. Spivak

  • Intramedullary nailing of the lower extremity: biomechanics and biology.

    Matthew R. Bong;Frederick J. Kummer;Kenneth J. Koval;Kenneth A. Egol

  • The incidence of full thickness rotator cuff tears in a large cadaveric population.

    C Lehman;F Cuomo;F J Kummer;J D Zuckerman

  • Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures occurring at the tip of the stem: a biomechanical study of 5 techniques.

    Michael G Dennis;Jordan A Simon;Frederick J Kummer;Kenneth J Koval

  • Fixation of diaphyseal fractures with a segmental defect: a biomechanical comparison of locked and conventional plating techniques.

    Eric Fulkerson;Kenneth A. Egol;Erik N. Kubiak;Frank Liporace

  • Kinematics of the first metatarsophalangeal joint.

    Michael J. Shereff;Fadi J. Bejjani;Frederick J. Kummer

  • Stress fractures of the femoral neck.

    Kenneth A. Egol;Kenneth J. Koval;Frederick Kummer;Victor H. Frankel

  • Treatment of Complex Tibial Plateau Fractures Using the Less Invasive Stabilization System Plate: Clinical Experience and a Laboratory Comparison with Double Plating

    Kenneth A. Egol;Edward Su;Nirmal C. Tejwani;Stephen H. Sims

  • Distal femoral fixation: a biomechanical comparison of the standard condylar buttress plate, a locked buttress plate, and the 95-degree blade plate.

    Kenneth J. Koval;James J. Hoehl;Frederick J. Kummer;Jordan A. Simon

  • The effect of acetabular cup orientations on limiting hip rotation.

    Frederick J. Kummer;Sapna Shah;Sangamithra Iyer;Paul E. DiCesare

  • The influence of coracoacromial arch anatomy on rotator cuff tears.

    Joseph D. Zuckerman;Frederick J. Kummer;Frances Cuomo;Jordan Simon

  • The current status of locked plating: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

    Eric J Strauss;Ran Schwarzkopf;Frederick Kummer;Kenneth A Egol

  • Vascular anatomy of the fifth metatarsal.

    Michael J. Shereff;Quing Ming Yang;Frederick J. Kummer;Carol C. Frey

  • Surgical Neck Fractures of the Proximal Humerus: A Laboratory Evaluation of Ten Fixation Techniques

    Kenneth J. Koval;Benjamin Blair;Robert Takei;Frederick J. Kummer

  • Comparison of the LISS and a retrograde-inserted supracondylar intramedullary nail for fixation of a periprosthetic distal femur fracture proximal to a total knee arthroplasty.

    Matthew R. Bong;Kenneth A. Egol;Kenneth J. Koval;Frederick J. Kummer

  • Stability of press-fit acetabular cups.

    E. Adler;S.A. Stuchin;F.J. Kummer

  • Fixation of periprosthetic femoral shaft fractures associated with cemented femoral stems : A biomechanical comparison of locked plating and conventional cable plates

    Eric Fulkerson;Kenneth Koval;Charles F Preston;Kazuho Iesaka

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth J. Koval
Kenneth J. Koval New York University
Joseph D. Zuckerman
Joseph D. Zuckerman New York University
Kenneth A. Egol
Kenneth A. Egol New York University
David L. Helfet
David L. Helfet Hospital for Special Surgery
Constance D. Lehman
Constance D. Lehman Harvard University
Craig J. Della Valle
Craig J. Della Valle Rush University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As interest in healthcare grows, students are increasingly exploring alternative pathways to enter or advance in the medical field. Online degree options now make it possible to earn qualifications with greater flexibility and convenience than traditional programs.

If you are a registered nurse seeking career advancement, consider the benefits of rn to bsn online no clinicals programs, which allow you to complete academic requirements without in-person clinicals. For those aiming for leadership or specialized roles, the shortest dnp programs online and a variety of other online dnp programs can accelerate your route to a terminal nursing degree.

Aspiring nurses can also take advantage of fast track lpn programs, offering a quicker way into the workforce. These online pathways make it easier for working professionals and non-traditional students to pursue their healthcare dreams, providing new opportunities in medicine while balancing work and family commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Frederick J. Kummer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles