World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
36
Citations
4701
World Ranking
7158
National Ranking
372

Dominik Seidel publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominik Seidel sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 85 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Dominik Seidel D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dominik Seidel sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Dominik Seidel is affiliated with the University of Göttingen in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science with significant contributions to agricultural and biological sciences.

Seidel's work spans several specialized subfields, including nature and landscape conservation, insect science, global and planetary change, environmental engineering, and ecology.

Main topics of research conducted by Seidel include:

  • Forest ecology and management
  • Forest ecology and biodiversity studies
  • Remote sensing and LiDAR applications
  • Ecology and vegetation dynamics studies
  • Plant water relations and carbon dynamics
  • Tree-ring climate responses
  • Forest management and policy

Seidel has frequently published in the following venues:

  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • Remote Sensing
  • Trees Forests and People
  • Trees
  • New Forests

Among recent papers authored or co-authored by Seidel are:

  • "Global patterns and climatic controls of forest structural complexity," 2021, Nature Communications
  • "Predicting Tree Species From 3D Laser Scanning Point Clouds Using Deep Learning," 2021, Frontiers in Plant Science
  • "Enhancing the structural diversity between forest patches-A concept and real-world experiment to study biodiversity, multifunctionality and forest resilience across spatial scales," 2022, Global Change Biology
  • "Deriving Stand Structural Complexity from Airborne Laser Scanning Data-What Does It Tell Us about a Forest?," 2020, Remote Sensing
  • "Mother trees, altruistic fungi, and the perils of plant personification," 2023, Trends in Plant Science

Seidel collaborates frequently with the following researchers:

  • Christian Ammer
  • Peter Annighöfer
  • Martin Ehbrecht
  • Bernhard Schuldt
  • Liane Neudam

Best Publications

  • Combining high biodiversity with high yields in tropical agroforests

    Yann Clough;Jan Barkmann;Jana Juhrbandt;Michael Kessler

  • Global patterns and climatic controls of forest structural complexity.

    Martin Ehbrecht;Dominik Seidel;Peter Annighöfer;Holger Kreft

  • Quantifying stand structural complexity and its relationship with forest management, tree species diversity and microclimate

    Martin Ehbrecht;Peter Schall;Christian Ammer;Dominik Seidel

  • Tree diversity and environmental context predict herb species richness and cover in Germany's largest connected deciduous forest

    Elke A. Vockenhuber;Christoph Scherber;Christina Langenbruch;Meik Meißner

  • Crown modeling by terrestrial laser scanning as an approach to assess the effect of aboveground intra- and interspecific competition on tree growth

    Jérôme Metz;Dominik Seidel;Peter Schall;Dina Scheffer

  • Analyzing forest canopies with ground-based laser scanning: A comparison with hemispherical photography

    Dominik Seidel;Stefan Fleck;Christoph Leuschner

  • Crown plasticity in mixed forests—Quantifying asymmetry as a measure of competition using terrestrial laser scanning

    Dominik Seidel;Christoph Leuschner;Annika Müller;Benjamin Krause

  • Effects of structural heterogeneity on the diurnal temperature range in temperate forest ecosystems

    Martin Ehbrecht;Peter Schall;Christian Ammer;Markus Fischer

  • Effective number of layers: A new measure for quantifying three-dimensional stand structure based on sampling with terrestrial LiDAR

    Martin Ehbrecht;Peter Schall;Julia Juchheim;Christian Ammer

  • Key ecological research questions for Central European forests

    Christian Ammer;Andreas Fichtner;Anton Fischer;Martin M. Gossner

  • The relationship between tree species richness, canopy space exploration and productivity in a temperate broad-leaf mixed forest

    Dominik Seidel;Christoph Leuschner;Christoph Scherber;Friderike Beyer

  • Review of ground-based methods to measure the distribution of biomass in forest canopies

    Dominik Seidel;Stefan Fleck;Christoph Leuschner;Tom Hammett

  • A holistic approach to determine tree structural complexity based on laser scanning data and fractal analysis.

    Dominik Seidel

  • On the exposure of hemispherical photographs in forests

    P. Beckschäfer;D. Seidel;C. Kleinn;J. Xu

  • Mixed-species tree plantings enhance structural complexity in oil palm plantations

    Delphine Clara Zemp;Martin Ehbrecht;Dominik Seidel;Christian Ammer

  • 3D-laser scanning: A non-destructive method for studying above- ground biomass and growth of juvenile trees

    Dominik Seidel;Friderike Beyer;Dietrich Hertel;Stefan Fleck

  • Mechanical abrasion, and not competition for light, is the dominant canopy interaction in a temperate mixed forest

    Peter Hajek;Dominik Seidel;Christoph Leuschner

  • Climate Responses of Aboveground Productivity and Allocation in Fagus sylvatica: A Transect Study in Mature Forests

    Hilmar Müller-Haubold;Dietrich Hertel;Dominik Seidel;Florian Knutzen

  • Enhancing the structural diversity between forest patches—A concept and real‐world experiment to study biodiversity, multifunctionality and forest resilience across spatial scales

    Unknown

  • How management intensity and neighborhood composition affect the structure of beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) trees

    Julia Juchheim;Peter Annighöfer;Christian Ammer;Kim Calders;Kim Calders

  • Ectomycorrhizal and saprotrophic soil fungal biomass are driven by different factors and vary among broadleaf and coniferous temperate forests

    Abdallah Awad;Andrzej Majcherczyk;Peter Schall;Kristina Schröter

Frequent Co-Authors

Christian Ammer
Christian Ammer University of Göttingen
Peter Schall
Peter Schall University of Göttingen
Christoph Leuschner
Christoph Leuschner University of Göttingen
Klaus J. Puettmann
Klaus J. Puettmann Oregon State University
Holger Kreft
Holger Kreft University of Göttingen
Dietrich Hertel
Dietrich Hertel University of Göttingen
Dirk Hölscher
Dirk Hölscher University of Göttingen
Alexander Knohl
Alexander Knohl University of Göttingen
Teja Tscharntke
Teja Tscharntke University of Göttingen
Damayanti Buchori
Damayanti Buchori IPB University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Ecology and Evolution opens up a variety of online avenues for further education and diverse career opportunities. Many students find value in developing interdisciplinary skillsets that complement their scientific expertise. For example, programs like an online math degree can sharpen analytical and statistical skills, which are essential for research and data-driven roles in environmental science.

Creative and communication skills are also highly sought after in this field. Those interested in science communication or data visualization might consider graphic design schools online, as these programs teach how to effectively present complex ecological data through visuals and digital media.

Flexibility and affordability are key when considering advanced studies. Exploring an online interdisciplinary studies degree financial aid can help students tailor their education to their specific interests, while also managing tuition costs. Similarly, educators and researchers looking to expand their qualifications may benefit from the most affordable online master's in education, which supports career advancement in both academic and public outreach roles.

Best Scientists Citing Dominik Seidel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles