World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Goddert von Oheimb

Goddert von Oheimb

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
55
Citations
9721
World Ranking
3009
National Ranking
160

Goddert von Oheimb publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Goddert von Oheimb sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 169 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Goddert von Oheimb D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Goddert von Oheimb sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Goddert von Oheimb is affiliated with TU Dresden in Germany and has contributed extensively to environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences. Their research spans key areas related to forest ecology, biodiversity, and ecosystem functioning.

The scientist's recent publications cover various aspects of forest biodiversity and tree growth dynamics, including:

  • Functional diversity effects on productivity increase with age in a forest biodiversity experiment (2021, Nature Ecology & Evolution)
  • Species richness stabilizes productivity via asynchrony and drought-tolerance diversity in a large-scale tree biodiversity experiment (2021, Science Advances)
  • Neighbourhood diversity mitigates drought impacts on tree growth (2020, Journal of Ecology)
  • The significance of tree-tree interactions for forest ecosystem functioning (2021, Basic and Applied Ecology)
  • Neighbourhood-mediated shifts in tree biomass allocation drive overyielding in tropical species mixtures (2020, New Phytologist)

Goddert von Oheimb frequently collaborates with several researchers, including Andreas Fichtner, Matthias Kunz, Helge Bruelheide, Werner Härdtle, and Nico Eisenhauer. This network reflects a consistent partnership in studying forests and ecosystems.

The scientist publishes regularly in journals and venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Basic and Applied Ecology
  • New Phytologist
  • Ecology Letters
  • Nature Ecology & Evolution

Their main fields of study encompass environmental science with a significant focus also on agricultural and biological sciences. Subfields heavily represented in their work include nature and landscape conservation, global and planetary change, ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, insect science, and plant science.

Goddert von Oheimb's research topics highlight ecological and vegetation dynamics, forest ecology and management, forest ecology and biodiversity studies, plant and animal studies, remote sensing and LiDAR applications, forest management and policy, and botany and plant ecology studies.

Best Publications

  • Impacts of species richness on productivity in a large-scale subtropical forest experiment.

    Yuanyuan Huang;Yuxin Chen;Nadia Castro-Izaguirre;Martin Baruffol;Martin Baruffol

  • MIGRATION OF VASCULAR PLANTS TO SECONDARY WOODLANDS IN SOUTHERN SWEDEN

    Jörg Brunet;Goddert Von Oheimb

  • Designing forest biodiversity experiments : general considerations illustrated by a new large experiment in subtropical China

    Helge Bruelheide;Karin Nadrowski;Thorsten Assmann;Jürgen Bauhus

  • Biodiversity across trophic levels drives multifunctionality in highly diverse forests

    Andreas Schuldt;Thorsten Assmann;Matteo Brezzi;Matteo Brezzi;François Buscot

  • Community assembly during secondary forest succession in a Chinese subtropical forest

    Helge Bruelheide;Martin Böhnke;Sabine Both;Teng Fang

  • Species richness stabilizes productivity via asynchrony and drought-tolerance diversity in a large-scale tree biodiversity experiment

    Unknown

  • The effects of light and soil conditions on the species richness of the ground vegetation of deciduous forests in northern Germany (Schleswig-Holstein)

    Werner Härdtle;Goddert von Oheimb;Christina Westphal

  • Functional diversity effects on productivity increase with age in a forest biodiversity experiment.

    Franca J. Bongers;Bernhard Schmid;Helge Bruelheide;Frans Bongers

  • Multiple plant diversity components drive consumer communities across ecosystems

    Andreas Schuldt;Andreas Schuldt;Anne Ebeling;Matthias Kunz;Michael Staab

  • Is the reverse J-shaped diameter distribution universally applicable in European virgin beech forests?

    Christina Westphal;Nils Tremer;Goddert von Oheimb;Jan Hansen

  • From competition to facilitation: how tree species respond to neighbourhood diversity.

    Andreas Fichtner;Werner Härdtle;Ying Li;Helge Bruelheide

  • Structural pattern of a near-natural beech forest (Fagus sylvatica) (Serrahn, North-east Germany)

    Goddert von Oheimb;Christina Westphal;Holger Tempel;Werner Härdtle

  • Tree diversity promotes insect herbivory in subtropical forests of south-east China

    Andreas Schuldt;Martin Baruffol;Martin Böhnke;Helge Bruelheide

  • Establishment success in a forest biodiversity and ecosystem functioning experiment in subtropical China (BEF-China)

    Xuefei Yang;Xuefei Yang;Jürgen Bauhus;Sabine Both;Teng Fang

  • On the combined effect of soil fertility and topography on tree growth in subtropical forest ecosystems - a study from SE China

    Thomas Scholten;Philipp Goebes;Peter Kühn;Steffen Seitz

  • Neighbourhood interactions drive overyielding in mixed-species tree communities.

    Andreas Fichtner;Werner Härdtle;Helge Bruelheide;Matthias Kunz

  • Tree morphology responds to neighbourhood competition and slope in species-rich forests of subtropical China

    Anne C. Lang;Werner Härdtle;Helge Bruelheide;Christian Geißler

  • Crown plasticity and neighborhood interactions of European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) in an old-growth forest

    Matthias Schröter;Matthias Schröter;Werner Härdtle;Goddert von Oheimb

  • Neighbour species richness and local structural variability modulate aboveground allocation patterns and crown morphology of individual trees.

    Matthias Kunz;Andreas Fichtner;Werner Härdtle;Pasi Raumonen

  • Species diversity and species composition of epiphytic bryophytes and lichens – a comparison of managed and unmanaged beech forests in NE Germany

    A. Friedel;G. v.Oheimb;J. Dengler;W. Härdtle

  • Factors influencing vegetation gradients across ancient‐recent woodland borderlines in southern Sweden

    Jörg Brunet;Goddert von Oheimb;Martin Diekmann

  • Individual-tree radial growth in a subtropical broad-leaved forest: The role of local neighbourhood competition

    Goddert von Oheimb;Anne C. Lang;Helge Bruelheide;David I. Forrester;David I. Forrester

  • Community assembly during secondary forest succession in a Chinese subtropical forest

    Helge Bruelheide;Martin Bohnke;Sabine Both;Fang Teng

Frequent Co-Authors

Werner Härdtle
Werner Härdtle Leuphana University of Lüneburg
Helge Bruelheide
Helge Bruelheide Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Andreas Schuldt
Andreas Schuldt University of Göttingen
Thorsten Assmann
Thorsten Assmann Leuphana University of Lüneburg
Keping Ma
Keping Ma Chinese Academy of Sciences
Bernhard Schmid
Bernhard Schmid University of Zurich
Thomas Scholten
Thomas Scholten University of Tübingen
Christian Wirth
Christian Wirth Leipzig University
Michael Scherer-Lorenzen
Michael Scherer-Lorenzen University of Freiburg
Jürgen Bauhus
Jürgen Bauhus University of Freiburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students considering Ecology and Evolution, a variety of online degree programs can help shape future career paths in research, education, and applied sciences. Many people start their academic journey by choosing affordable online interdisciplinary studies degrees, which offer flexibility and broad exposure to science, communication, and policy—core areas for ecology-related careers.

Graduate pathways are also evolving, with the option to pursue a quickest cheapest masters degree in fields such as environmental policy or scientific writing. These accelerated and cost-effective programs help students quickly qualify for advanced roles or new specialties.

If you’re interested in preserving biological information or supporting environmental research, consider exploring colleges with library science programs. Library science training is ideal for those drawn to careers in data management, curation, or science communication within ecology organizations.

Additionally, those who wish to combine biology with health sciences may consider asha approved slp programs online. These programs open doors to clinical or educational roles that intersect with neurological and behavioral aspects of ecology.

Best Scientists Citing Goddert von Oheimb

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles