World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
38
Citations
5789
World Ranking
6624
National Ranking
346

Andreas Schuldt publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andreas Schuldt sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 121 publications — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Andreas Schuldt D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andreas Schuldt sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andreas Schuldt is affiliated with the University of Göttingen in Germany. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and agricultural and biological sciences, with a substantial output in these fields. Schuldt's work covers several subfields, including nature and landscape conservation, global and planetary change, ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, and insect science.

The scientist's research topics span a range of ecological and biological themes. Notable areas of study include ecology and vegetation dynamics, plant and animal studies, species distribution and climate change, forest ecology and biodiversity, forest management and policy, forest insect ecology and management, along with broader aspects of forest ecology and management.

Andreas Schuldt has published extensively in various scientific journals and platforms. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Ecology
  • Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • Journal of Applied Ecology
  • Basic and Applied Ecology

Among recent papers associated with the wider collaborative network including Schuldt, notable publications are:

  • "The Influence of Tree Diversity on Natural Enemies-a Review of the "Enemies" Hypothesis in Forests" (2020) in Current Forestry Reports
  • "Neighbourhood diversity mitigates drought impacts on tree growth" (2020) in Journal of Ecology
  • "The significance of tree-tree interactions for forest ecosystem functioning" (2021) in Basic and Applied Ecology
  • "Host functional and phylogenetic composition rather than host diversity structure plant-herbivore networks" (2020) in Molecular Ecology
  • "Tree phylogenetic diversity structures multitrophic communities" (2020) in Functional Ecology

The scientist frequently collaborates with a core group of researchers in their field. These coauthors include:

  • Helge Bruelheide
  • Keping Ma
  • Yi Li
  • Chao-Dong Zhu
  • Xiaojuan Liu

Andreas Schuldt's body of work reflects engagement with both applied and theoretical aspects of forest ecology and biodiversity, emphasizing the interactions between tree diversity, ecosystem functioning, and species communities. The range of publication venues and collaboration networks illustrates the interdisciplinary and international nature of their research.

Best Publications

  • Impacts of species richness on productivity in a large-scale subtropical forest experiment.

    Yuanyuan Huang;Yuxin Chen;Nadia Castro-Izaguirre;Martin Baruffol;Martin Baruffol

  • Designing forest biodiversity experiments : general considerations illustrated by a new large experiment in subtropical China

    Helge Bruelheide;Karin Nadrowski;Thorsten Assmann;Jürgen Bauhus

  • Biodiversity across trophic levels drives multifunctionality in highly diverse forests

    Andreas Schuldt;Thorsten Assmann;Matteo Brezzi;Matteo Brezzi;François Buscot

  • Community assembly during secondary forest succession in a Chinese subtropical forest

    Helge Bruelheide;Martin Böhnke;Sabine Both;Teng Fang

  • Multiple plant diversity components drive consumer communities across ecosystems

    Andreas Schuldt;Andreas Schuldt;Anne Ebeling;Matthias Kunz;Michael Staab

  • Carabids.org – a dynamic online database of ground beetle species traits (Coleoptera, Carabidae)

    Katharina Homburg;Nils Homburg;Florian Schäfer;Andreas Schuldt

  • Tree diversity promotes insect herbivory in subtropical forests of south-east China

    Andreas Schuldt;Martin Baruffol;Martin Böhnke;Helge Bruelheide

  • Synthesis and future research directions linking tree diversity to growth, survival, and damage in a global network of tree diversity experiments

    Jake J. Grossman;Margot Vanhellemont;Nadia Barsoum;Jürgen Bauhus

  • A multitrophic perspective on biodiversity-ecosystem functioning research

    Nico Eisenhauer;Holger Schielzeth;Andrew D. Barnes;Kathryn E. Barry

  • Tree morphology responds to neighbourhood competition and slope in species-rich forests of subtropical China

    Anne C. Lang;Werner Härdtle;Helge Bruelheide;Christian Geißler

  • Plant traits affecting herbivory on tree recruits in highly diverse subtropical forests.

    Andreas Schuldt;Helge Bruelheide;Walter Durka;David Eichenberg

  • Predator diversity and abundance provide little support for the enemies hypothesis in forests of high tree diversity.

    Andreas Schuldt;Sabine Both;Helge Bruelheide;Werner Härdtle

  • Macroecological patterns of spider species richness across Europe

    O.-D. Finch;T. Blick;A. Schuldt

  • The Influence of Tree Diversity on Natural Enemies—a Review of the “Enemies” Hypothesis in Forests

    Michael Staab;Andreas Schuldt

  • The significance of tree-tree interactions for forest ecosystem functioning

    Stefan Trogisch;Xiaojuan Liu;Gemma Rutten;Kai Xue;Kai Xue

  • Neighbourhood diversity mitigates drought impacts on tree growth

    Andreas Fichtner;Florian Schnabel;Helge Bruelheide;Matthias Kunz

  • Communities of ground-living spiders in deciduous forests: Does tree species diversity matter?

    Andreas Schuldt;Nadine Fahrenholz;Mascha Brauns;Sonja Migge-Kleian

  • Environmental and historical effects on richness and endemism patterns of carabid beetles in the western Palaearctic

    Andreas Schuldt;Thorsten Assmann

  • Functional and phylogenetic diversity of woody plants drive herbivory in a highly diverse forest

    Andreas Schuldt;Thorsten Assmann;Helge Bruelheide;Walter Durka

  • The influence of leaf litter diversity and soil fauna on initial soil erosion in subtropical forests

    Steffen Seitz;Philipp Goebes;Pascale Zumstein;Thorsten Assmann

  • Community assembly during secondary forest succession in a Chinese subtropical forest

    Helge Bruelheide;Martin Bohnke;Sabine Both;Fang Teng

Frequent Co-Authors

Helge Bruelheide
Helge Bruelheide Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg
Thorsten Assmann
Thorsten Assmann Leuphana University of Lüneburg
Werner Härdtle
Werner Härdtle Leuphana University of Lüneburg
Keping Ma
Keping Ma Chinese Academy of Sciences
Bernhard Schmid
Bernhard Schmid University of Zurich
Alexandra-Maria Klein
Alexandra-Maria Klein University of Freiburg
Michael Scherer-Lorenzen
Michael Scherer-Lorenzen University of Freiburg
Christian Wirth
Christian Wirth Leipzig University
François Buscot
François Buscot Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Ecology and Evolution often requires advanced education and specialized knowledge. Many students explore online degree options for greater flexibility and accessibility. Whether you are considering an undergraduate or graduate degree, it’s important to choose the right institution and program for your goals.

For those transitioning within the sciences or healthcare, comparing programs is key. For example, nursing students often weigh capella vs chamberlain rn to bsn to find the best fit in both reputation and curriculum. Additionally, accelerated degree paths like rn to bsn to msn online programs can be an efficient way to advance your qualifications while balancing work and study.

Institutional quality is crucial—choose from the non profit universities known for strong accreditation and student support. If you have a military background, you’ll find many options among the military friendly colleges that offer additional resources and benefits.

The right online degree can open doors to research, conservation, policy, and other rewarding careers in the Ecology and Evolution fields.

Best Scientists Citing Andreas Schuldt

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles